ORDAINED MINISTERS

From the desk of
Bill Ramey

ORDAINED MINISTERS

Did Christ command that ministers be ordained and partnered with the Roman Government in that office? Wouldn’t that constitute a pact with the devil? The devil told Christ he owned all the governments of the world and gave them to whomever he chose --- see Luke 4.

Why does the American Government demand that all ministers be ordained and therefore registered? Because America is the Image of the Beast mentioned in Revelation 13 and exercises all the control of the Roman Government in the world today. They do it for control! An ordained minister has divided loyalties between the divine and the state or federal government. Can this be so????

As evidence I offer the wedding ceremonies performed by ordained ministers. The closing line goes something like this: “By the authority invested in me by God and the state of _______, I now pronounce you man and wife.” Now the state (or gov’t) is a party to the marriage as evidenced by the marriage license and contractually has jurisdiction over the children of this marriage. They are within their jurisdiction in telling you how to raise these children!

Ordained ministers in America are now, by decree of George Bush as president of the nation, (Executive Order #13397) answerable to the head of Homeland Security and as such are agents of the federal government! And, by that “law”, are required to report any activities in their membership which is not commensurate with government ideals.

Do we need to go into what constitutes “government ideals”? Legalized murder in the form of abortions. Legalized marriage of homosexuals. Bailouts from the federal coffers for non performers. Our government has already been weighed in the balances and found wanting (my opinion), and we are merely waiting for the hammer to fall on us as a nation.

Have we lost our mind and our national conscience (if we ever had one)?

Today, we in America, are every bit as much slaves as were the Israelites in Egypt and like them it will take a miracle for our deliverance. And, yes, I am familiar with the old saw, “Home of the brave and land of the free.” This myth was promoted by the jesuits that hammered out America as a nation. The point man in that endeavor was named Americ. Go figure.

ORDINATION --- A CATHOLIC RITUAL

The following is taken from the ’91 edition of Colliers Encyclopedia --- article HOLY ORDERS.

Ordo (“order,” “rank”) and ordinatios (“ordination,” “appointment to office”) were technical terms of Roman officialdom. The term “order,” used in ecclesiastical language since Tertullian (second century), denotes: 1) one of the ranks in the ministry, 2) the office of a minister, and 3) the act whereby such rank or office is conferred. In the second or third meaning, the term is usually plural (“orders,” often “holy orders”); “ordination” applies only to the third meaning.

The number of orders (ranks or grades) has varied, but since the third century seven (or eight) have usually been enumerated: 1) doorkeeper, 2) reader, 3) exorcist, 4) acolyte, 5) subdeacon, 6) deacon, 7) priest, and 8) bishop, which is often coupled with priest. The Latin and Armenian Churches have all eight; the Eastern Churches generally have 2,5,6,7, and 8; the Anglican Church has 6,7, and 8; Calvin retained 7 and 6 (presbyters, elders); Luther held no rigid system, and lutherans consider all clergy equal in order, using the titles of bishop, pastor, elder and deacon; other churches use various terms.

That order is a sacrament or sensible sign instituted by Christ to confer grace for the ministry is the traditional teaching of the Church, defined by the Council of Trent (1563), and held by the Roman Catholic and Eastern Churches and by the Anglican Communion. There is but one sacrament of order: to it, as parts, belong the priesthood and diaconate; the Scholastics held the episcopate to be merely “the fullness of the priesthood,” while it is regarded by most modern theologians as a special order. Theologians commonly teach that the minor orders (doorkeeper, reader, exorcist, acolyte) are not a sacrament, but sacramentals instituted by the Church. The Protestant Reformers affirmed the universality of the Christian priesthood and abolished the essential distinction between orders and laity. Although the Church of England once debated the validity of order as a sacrament, the rite of ordination was always maintained. Protestants generally hold that order is not a sacrament.

In 1947 Pope Pius XII defined, for future ordinations, that the essential rite of the sacrament consists in the laying on of hands and the accompanying words which determine the office (diaconate, priesthood, episcopate) being conferred, without settling for the past whether the “giving of the instruments” (book, chalice, pater) was also an essential. Since this sacrament confers a “character,” a valid ordination can never be repeated.

Have our ordained ministers of America signed a pact with the devil?

THE IMAGE by Bill Ramey

From the desk of
Bill Ramey
2008

I have spent most of my adult life trying to understand history, prophecy and the worldwide conspiracy that is obvious to any serious and objective observer. This study began at the age of twenty when my mother read to me from the book of Maccabees about the Ark of the Covenant being hidden by Jeremiah in a cave on the “Mountain of Moses” and sealing the cave. I located that artifact in ’96 after a 40 year search. Did it make the evening news? No it did not. The news media will wait for their bosses to tell them which ark is the real one. (There are now 19+ contending for the spotlight –there were four at the time I located the original.) The counterfeit will play a major role in political events at the close of this age and just before the present governments and institutions are dissolved.

Many myths had to be debunked in that search and it underscored for me the comment by one historian that: “History is agreed upon myth.”

The study of history, prophecy and the conspiracy continued through a four year hitch in the U.S. Navy, a stint in college in Branson, Mo and a career in the chemical industry on the Mojave Desert. Now at the age of 72, the picture is beginning to come together. This writing is a product of that study.

THE IMAGE

By

Bill Ramey

INSIDE FRONT COVER

To me it is incredible how Henry Halley, who publishes a Bible Handbook and has edited it many times, can publish his history of the church year after year and still believe that the Catholic Church is the one founded by Christ.

Printing the atrocities perpetrated by Vatican leadership and then declaring that to be the original church seems nothing short of blasphemy.

I hope to show you that the Catholic Church is a political group more interested in world dominion than your salvation and mine. I will show you that they are the “Stand-in” for the fourth empire, foretold by the prophet Daniel, that was to be a world ruling empire. All of the four empires that Daniel laid out in chapter two (Nebuchadnezzar’s dream), that were to be the major powers leading right up to the Messiah’s second coming and the dissolution of man’s governments and institutions, were to be world ruling. See Daniel 2. Catholics and Jews work in concert today toward complete and total subjugation of all earth’s inhabitants.

It may surprise the reader to learn that the world has been under a one world government for the past 2,600 years --- but that also, I shall try to show you.

There will be many myths exploded because the history of Rome and the Catholic Church are built on myths. Evidently Romans are not all that proud of their history judging from the account of the Catholic historian, Marcius Willson. “Outlines of History”, Circa 1864, Page 126, paragraph 1: “What historians have related of the founding of Rome, and of the first century, at least, of its existence, has been drawn from numerous traditionary legends, known, from their character, to be mostly fabulous, and has therefore no valid claims to authenticity. Still it is proper to relate, as an introduction to what is better known, the story most accredited by the Romans themselves, and contained in their earliest writings, while at the same time we express the opinion that it has little or no foundation in truth.” So what is the truth about the founding of Rome and why do they prefer myth?

It seems altogether fitting and proper that Roman history has its roots in myths because it would seem they are determined to turn all world history into myths. This continued with converting to myth the history of Ireland. The destruction of Irish history was pretty well completed by St Patrick (a Jew who converted to Catholicism) before the close of the fifth century AD. Next came the book burnings of England. It would seem that these campaigns were aimed at erasing the connections of Ireland and England to the tribes of Israel. It’s interesting to note what the 1964 edition of the Encyclopedia Americana had to say in its article on Ireland. “Ireland was invaded at the dawn of time by a magic folk called the Tuatha de Danaan…” A magic folk??? Really? And this is in a supposedly reputable encyclopedia (although very obviously Catholic edited). So who were the Tuatha de Danaan? Any student of the old Erse language could have interpreted this for the writer of the encyclopedia article. A “Tuath” is simply a tribe. Tuatha de Danaan is simply the “Tribe of Dan”. Can we see the connection?

THE IMAGE

By

Bill Ramey

Author’s note: This communiqué is offered as an educational service in the public interest. It is not copyrighted and may be shared, copied and distributed freely. “Freely you have received, freely give…”

The author respectfully requests that it not be sold or quoted out of context.

Contents

Chapter 1 This World is a Mess
Chapter 2 The Book of Daniel
Chapter 3 The World Bank
Chapter 4 The Ashkenazi Jews
Chapter 5 Why the Holocaust?
Chapter 6 Jew/Arab Conflict
Chapter 7 God’s Chosen
Chapter 8 Two Witnesses
Chapter 9 Love/hate
Chapter 10 Watchmen
Chapter 11 Gog and Magog
Chapter 12 TV Agenda
Chapter 13 The Image of the Beast
Chapter 14 Worshipping the Image

FOREWORD

When we enter this world knowing next to nothing, it can and does become a very confusing place. It’s something like coming into a movie at intermission and trying to piece together enough of the story so it makes sense. We get spoon fed others' perceptions of reality first from our parents and then from teachers as we get into the public education system. As we get to an age of accountability and begin to take charge of our lives we find that much of our thinking has already been done for us. We find that there are systems already set up in society which we are supposed to fit ourselves into. Few question these systems because it is assumed they were set up by folks who knew what they were doing. It sometimes takes the rest our lives to unlearn the things we learn in grade school. Grade schools (all schools) are just another of those systems set up by others which we are supposed to fit into.

Try to lay aside prejudices built around race, culture, religion, education and social status, because, as I will try to demonstrate, all these live in a house of myths. The higher you are on the education ladder, the more sophisticated the myths, but myths, nevertheless.

Peer pressure is the greatest tool ever invented, by those involved in mind control, for supporting myths. There was an interesting demonstration of this conducted in Los Angeles, California, by a group who was normally employed doing opinion polls for sales groups willing to pay big bucks to find out how their products were perceived by the general public. This endeavor picked people from off the street for their polls and tried to get a cross section of society. How or why the idea came about for demonstrating the power of peer pressure, I do not know, but here is how it worked. Twenty people were recruited from off the street, rehearsed on the scenario and sent back out on the street to be brought back into the studio as a group, but with one added who had not been rehearsed on what was to transpire. When the group was brought in and seated, the one who conducted the experiment then introduced himself and gave a brief rundown as to what he was instructed to solicit from the group in the way of perceptions. It’s important to keep in mind that the one who had not been rehearsed felt that he/she was part of a group that had been pulled in arbitrarily from the street.

There was a chart on the wall which had four lines on it and they were labeled A, B, C and D. Something like this:
A. ---------
B. ----------------------
C. -------------
D. -----
The question was then asked of the group, "Which line do you perceive as the longest?" Now those who had been rehearsed had been instructed that in no case were they to say "Line B." They could pick A, C or D, but not line B.

The moderator, for the first several times, would call on those who had been rehearsed and, as planned, their answers would range through all the options except B. After several of these had given their "perceptions", the moderator would then call on the person who had not been rehearsed, (who, I'm sure by this time had begun to question his/her own sanity), and none answered that B was his/her perception of the longest line. This was repeated dozens of times and these were all adults, (not children in a sand box), but not one dared to speak up and state the obvious.

Most union members have witnessed how two or three can dominate a meeting and seem to "comprise a majority." We have been so conditioned to accept others' authority/views/ perceptions that our tendency is to submerge our own personalities and become automatons, especially when the stage has been cleverly set by experts in mind control.

Haven't you and I also accepted and acknowledged the lies of others at times? The whole world does and this is why peer pressure is such a powerful tool. Not only does it work in the sand box but also at the highest levels of education, and yes, even government. Ask any freshman congressman/woman.

THE IMAGE

Chapter 1

THIS WORLD IS A MESS

Have you ever wondered at the task Elijah had set before him when he had to go head to head with 400 prophets of Baal and tell them that their god was no God at all but a mere idol? (I Kings, chapter 18) And these prophets exercised their deception at the pleasure of Queen Jezebel who was thoroughly immersed in the religion of Baal for political reasons. Now try to think about the task of telling Americans who feel that we are a “Christian Nation” that all those church houses with a steeple are worship centers for Baal. Do you think they would become as glandular as the Baal worshippers of ancient Israel?

I do not intend to wade through all the research I have done on steeples at this time. If you have enough interest to question how we got them, then hopefully, you have enough interest to carry through with your own research project into their origin.

We have the dubious honor of inheriting a world that seems to have gone mad and where do we start to try to make sense of it? Not only have we (mankind) polluted the soil, air and water, but we have heated the planet (evidently with the industrial revolution) to a point of melting the glaciers and affecting weather world wide. If that isn’t enough to sound the knell on life on earth then we appear to be poised to erase life from this planet with a nuclear war. Is this how our world is to end?

In the darkest hours of World War II, I remember a newscaster named Gabriel Heater who would come on radio with the words, “I have good news tonight.” Then he would proceed with something that, indeed, in those days when the balance of power seemed to hang by a thread, was good news when viewed against all the backdrop of bad news. I have good news today! The world is not going to end in a giant fireball of nuclear devastation. Note well that I did not say there will not be a nuclear war because there appears to be one (probably two) in the lineup of future events. We are living in times the prophets of old spoke of which is termed “the time of the end.” This, however, is denoting the end of an age and not the end of the world. Noah lived to see the end of one age and the ushering in of another but it wasn’t the end of the world, even though there were few people left --- the world survived.

Now if you are a student of “Darwinian Folly” and immersed in today’s world of religion, education and/or politics, you may find the mention of Noah a “turnoff”. Hasn’t modern science demonstrated that the flood of Noah’s day was a myth? No they haven’t! You see modern education promotes myths like “Columbus discovered America” and they do it with peer pressure and ruling out “line B”. Who were the “Indians” that were here when Columbus landed --- if he landed? Non humans?

The world today is filled with prophets of Baal, prophets of Muhammad, prophets of Bhudda and the list goes on and on. We in America have been brainwashed to believe that our brand of “Christianity” is that which Christ brought and that we will be spared as the world goes down the sewer but is this simply another version or the same deception the rest of the world is laboring under? Weren’t the Jews laboring under the same misconception at the time Nebuchadnezzar laid waste to Jerusalem and destroyed the Temple? Why do the Jews (or those who call themselves Jews) consider themselves “God’s Chosen People”? And if they are, then chosen for what?

In my 72 years, I have found only one historian of note that dares delve into where we (America and Europe) got our “Christianity”. Why is this and just who is the author? Why are authors hesitant to tell it like it is? Because the Vatican defines “Christianity” for the world today and has the power to take down opposition. Now, those who claim to have come out of popery and call themselves protestants should perhaps examine their lives to see just how much Catholic baggage they carry. There used to be an old Cardinal in New York City that would chide the protestants by saying, “Search the scriptures and nowhere will you find authorization for Sunday worship other than Catholic doctrine and authority.” He was absolutely right! And that is only the beginning. Protestants use much of the same rituals, observe the same holidays and generally follow the lead of the “Mother church”. We find a cryptic scripture in Revelation 17 which speaks of the “…MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.” Did the harlot mother have daughters?

Now as for who the author(s) were who dared do an expose’ on “Christianity” --- they were Will and Ariel Durant and the history is their “History of Civilization” in ten volumes. I believe the part which covers today’s “Christianity” is in volume III. This was their conclusion. “What we have today could be more accurately called Christianized Paganism or Paganized Christianity.” You may not find their work on the shelves of our universities today because it would seem that all manmade institutions today busy themselves with supporting and justifying the smoke and mirrors of the Vatican. University mythology is refined to support Vatican myths.

“And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, ‘Who is like unto the beast? Who is able to make war with him?’” Revelation 13:4

If we are to get our bearings in this topsy-turvy world of today, we would do well to study the book of Daniel. Daniel’s prophecies cover the entire spectrum from the then present (about 600 BC) to the time when the govern-ments of this world will be replaced by the Kingdom of God. Yes, the meek are to inherit the earth as it says in Matthew 5. The angel that gave the vision and message to Daniel divided the end time world into only two camps. These were the wicked and the wise. The wise were defined by the angel as those who would understand the vision and the message, given to Daniel, of the end time --- even though Daniel himself did not understand the message during his lifetime. (See Daniel 12:8) This is not surprising since Daniel was a citizen of an ox-cart society and was shown the engines of modern warfare in vision. The “Other camp” was all the wicked.

Why is the world in such a mess today? The answer is found in the book of Isaiah, chapter 24, verse 5: “The earth is defiled under the inhabitants thereof, because they have transgressed the laws, changed the ordinances, broken the everlasting covenant.”

Chapter 2

THE BOOK OF DANIEL

The book of Daniel is found right after the book of Ezekiel in the Bible. Daniel was a captive taken by Nebuchadnezzar’s armies in the invasion of the nation of Judah. So he was a Jew. Daniel 1:6

Daniel and his three friends, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah, were apparently young men at the time of their capture in the first wave of Jews taken to Babylon sometime around 604 BC. They had been selected as bright young men who could learn the Chaldean language and be trained in the king's service. Therefore, they were sent portions of food from that which was prepared for the king and his staff. They had set their minds not to defile themselves with unclean foods even if it was taken from the king's table. This was communicated to the prince into whose charge they were put and he arranged for them to have clean foods as delineated in the 11th chapter of Leviticus.

They learned quickly and were the most able administrators in Babylon. King Nebuchadnezzar was well aware of this. But even able administrators face trials. The king had a dream which he wanted interpreted and the "wise men" on his staff said, "Tell us the dream and we will tell you the interpretation." Now old Neb didn't get to be king of Babylon simply by climbing off the turnip wagon and wandering into the palace. He knew very well that dream interpreters have canned interpretations to roll off on que. So he told them he forgot the dream. Maybe he really had. But he expected them to reconstruct the dream and give an interpretation anyway. So the Chaldeans told the king there wasn't a man alive who could do that, Daniel 2:10. Not a "politically correct" answer to a king. The king flew into a rage and ordered his executioner to kill 'em all. Now, somehow, Daniel and his friends got lumped into this group of astrologers and magicians and were about to be "snuffed" along with the others. But Daniel told the king that if he would give him some time, he would tell the king his dream and the interpretation … and he did.

Let's pick up the story in Daniel 2:27. "Daniel answered in the presence of the king, and said, 'The secret which the king has demanded cannot the wise men, the astrologers, the magicians, the soothsayers, show unto the king;
28 "But there is a God in heaven that reveals secrets, and makes known to the king Nebuchadnezzar what shall be in the latter days. Your dream, and the visions of your head upon thy bed, are these;
29 "As for you, O king, your thoughts came into your mind upon thy bed, what should come to pass hereafter: and He that reveals secrets makes known to you what shall come to pass.
30 "But as for me, this secret is not revealed to me for any wisdom that I have more than any living, but for their sakes that shall make known the interpretation to the king, and that you might know the thoughts of your heart.
31 "You, O king, saw, and behold a great image. This great image, whose brightness was excellent, stood before you; and the form thereof was terrible.
32 "This image's head was of fine gold, his breast and his arms of silver, his belly and thighs of brass,
33 "His legs of iron, his feet part of iron and part of clay.
34 "You saw till that a stone was cut out without hands, which smote the image upon his feet that were of iron and clay, and broke them to pieces.
35 "Then was the iron, the clay, the brass, the silver, and the gold, broken to pieces together, and became like the chaff of the summer threshingfloors; and the wind carried them away, that no place was found for them: and the stone that smote the image became a great mountain and filled the whole earth.
36 "This is the dream; and we will tell the interpretation thereof before the king.
37 "You, O king, are a king of kings: for the God of heaven has given you a kingdom, power, and strength, and glory.
38 "And wherever the children of men dwell, the beasts of the field and the fowls of the heaven has he given into your hand, and has made you ruler over them all. You are this head of gold.
39 "And after you shall arise another kingdom inferior to you, and another third kingdom of brass, which shall bear rule over all the earth."

(At this point, perhaps we can begin to see why the agenda of the Smithsonian in promoting the Columbus myth. Our institutes of higher learning do not like to admit that there were "world ruling governments" before the time of Christ. It undermines their agenda. Columbus sailed in a 180 ton vessel and yet the Phoenicians were plying the seas 1,000 years BC in 1,200 ton vessels.)

40 "And the fourth kingdom shall be strong as iron: forasmuch as iron breaks in pieces and subdues all things: and as iron that breaks all these, shall it break in pieces and bruise.
41 "And whereas you saw the feet and toes, part of potters clay, and part of iron, the kingdom shall be divided; but there shall be in it of the strength of the iron, forasmuch as you saw the iron mixed with miry clay.
42 "And as the toes of the feet were part of iron, and part of clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong, and partly broken.
43 "And whereas you saw iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay.
44 "And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: And the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand forever.
45 "Forasmuch as you saw that the stone was cut out of the mountain without hands, and that it broke in pieces the iron, the brass, the clay, the silver and the gold; the great God has made known to the king what shall come to pass hereafter: and the dream is certain, and the interpretation thereof sure."

You can find the king's reaction in the next few verses. He didn't question the interpretation. Would you, if someone told you your dream first and then the interpretation? Nebuchadnezzar knew he was facing a represen-tative of a power which was superior to him and one which he did not understand. And he had seen laid out before him the progression of men's governments starting with him and running them right on out to the time when God would terminate human governments at a time when they were preparing for the ultimate war, one that would annihilate the last human from the face of the earth unless God Himself intervened. Matthew 24:22

Many "scholars" question the book of Daniel and contend that it was written centuries after the time when Daniel is supposed to have lived. However, in the interest of being fair, let's take this one more step in order that we may better understand what has transpired and is transpiring. A Greek historian named Xenophon mentioned the prophet Daniel by name in one of his works entitled "Cyropedia", Circa. 5th century BC --- Coincidence? The really unsettling thing, to those who try to discount this book, is that the prophecies are still being fulfilled today. Can you imagine the odds against a human being calling the four major divisions in world government from the sixth century BC to the present? The real clincher is that Christ acknowledged Daniel as a prophet (Matthew 24:15). Was he endorsing a fraud?

Now that we have seen the vision that was laid out to Nebuchadnezzar, let's take a look at history as it developed to see if we can assign any credibility to prophecy.

The interpretation of the vision (dream) said that the head of gold was Nebuchadnezzar and that the next division (the breast and the arms) would be made of silver. Doesn't it fit nicely that the conquerors of Babylon were the Medes and Persians in a confederacy? (Two arms?)

We need to exercise some caution as we look into the history of this period because those whose aspirations are recognition of their world dominion also have the power to censor history and have been exercising that power for millennia. For instance, if you go to the Encyclopedia Americana (1964 edition) and look up the article "Daniel", they will interpret the vision "for you". It goes like this: "The interpretation of the vision is revealed to Daniel: '…the four animals (this is talking about chapter 7 of Daniel) represent four empires, or those of Babylon, Media, Persia and Greece.'" THIS SIMPLY IS NOT TRUE! The Medes and Persians were a confederacy and therefore comprised the second empire. The attempt, by those who censor literature, is to take the spotlight off the Roman Empire as the fourth beast or empire.

The vision given to Daniel of the four beasts is in chapter 7. It was simply a corroboration of the vision given to Nebuchadnezzar in a dream. Let's look at chapter 7.

Starting in verse 1, "In the first year of Belshazzar, (grandson of Nebuchadnezzar) king of Babylon, Daniel had a dream and visions of his head upon his bed: then he wrote the dream, and told the sum of the matters.
2 "Daniel spoke and said, 'I saw in my vision by night, and behold, the four winds of the heaven strove upon the great sea.
3 'And four great beasts came up from the sea, different one from another.
4 'The first was like a lion and had eagle's wings: I beheld till the wings thereof were plucked, and it was lifted up from the earth, and made stand upon the feet as a man, and a man's heart was given to it.
5 'And behold another beast, a second, like to a bear, and it raised up itself on one side, and it had three ribs (Babylon/Lydia/Egypt?) in the mouth of it between the teeth of it and they said thus unto it 'Arise, devour much flesh.
6 'After this I beheld, and lo another, like a leopard, which had upon the back of it four wings of a fowl; the beast had also four heads; and dominion was given to it.
7 'After this I saw in the night visions, and behold a fourth beast, dreadful and terrible, and strong exceedingly; and it had great iron teeth: it devoured and broke in pieces, and stamped the residue with the feet of it: and it was different from all the beasts that were before it; and it had ten horns.'

These four beasts dovetail nicely with the four divisions in the image shown to Nebuchadnezzar in his dream. The first beast was like a lion. Archaeological excavations of ancient Babylon reveal lions sculpted into their walls as a symbol of their authority. Next in line came the Medo-Persians and they are represented as a bear, as well they should be. They were a marching army and a bear’s strength is in his legs. Next we see a beast compared to a leopard and could any beast better depict Alexander's army? Their victory over the Medo-Persians at the battle of Issus was primarily because they covered a distance the Medo-Persians knew (or thought they knew) couldn't be covered in the time Alexander's army did it in. Leopards are fast.

But let's look deeper into the book of Daniel and see if we can find more. Verse 17 of the same chapter says of these four beasts, "These great beasts, which are four, are four kings, (be aware that the Bible uses the terms kings and kingdoms interchangeably and this could be better translated as kingdoms because, as we will see in verse 23, "The fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom…" Besides, only one of the four had less than two kings) which shall arise out of the earth."

The perspective now shifts immediately to the fourth beast rather than dwelling on the first three. Notice in verse 18. "But the saints of the most High shall take the kingdom, and possess the kingdom forever, even forever and ever.
19 "Then I would know the truth of the fourth beast, which was different from all the others, exceeding dreadful, whose teeth were of iron, and his nails of brass; which devoured, broke in pieces, and stamped the residue with his feet;
20 "And of the ten horns that were in his head, and of the other which came up, and before whom three fell (Vandals/Barbarians/Ostrogoths?); even of that horn that had eyes and a mouth that spoke very great things, whose look was more stout than his fellows. (Papacy?)
21 "I beheld, and the same horn made war with the saints, and prevailed against them; (how long?)
22 "Until the Ancient of days came, and judgment was given to the saints of the most High; and the time came that the saints possessed the kingdom."

Then this war is still going on today, huh?

23 "Thus he said, 'The fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom (or empire) upon earth, which shall be different from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces."

Who are the ten horns?

24 "And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise: and another shall rise after them; and he shall be different from the first, and he shall subdue three kings.
25 "And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time."

Why is the world oblivious to the prophecy of Daniel? Keep in mind that we have only just begun to unravel the mysteries locked up in the book of Daniel, but let's look for a moment at what another prophet of God said. Hosea 4:6. "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge; because you hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject you…" At this point, it gets scary, because it goes on to say, "…seeing you hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget your children."

Is this why so many children's pictures are on milk cartons and in post offices in the U.S.? Have we pronounced a curse on our children just as the Jews of Christ's day did?

This is heavy stuff. I very well know that. But as we get further into the prophecies of, not only Daniel, but others, we will see that God foresaw our plight of today and began planning for it before the earth was created.

Those indoctrinated into the material world of today and seduced by the libertarian philosophies will ask, "Is this 'God stuff'' real"?

Rather that listen to the opinion makers, perhaps you should pause long enough to ask yourself where we are as a world and where we're going. Some of the things to look at could be:

• Food/population
• Nuclear proliferation
• Pollution
• Usage rates of non-renewable resources
• Expansion of deserts, worldwide
• Potable water
• Economic rape by world bankers and lawyers

Given this "rosy perspective", do you see a bright future for the world without the intervention of (as U.S. News and World Report put it) "A Strong Hand from Someplace"?

Our computers get faster yearly but what this does is concentrate more and more power into the hands of fewer "power brokers". Those people, it seems, get more and more profligate. Are we entrusting our future into the hands of draft dodgers and drug lords? I prefer the intervention of God. And I see that regardless of what men choose to do, He will intervene before we blast ourselves off the planet.

Shall we go back to the book of Daniel and learn more about what is about to befall us? You see, Daniel was given several visions of the future and wrote them down for us to consider today. One of the arch angels, Michael, told Daniel in chapter 10, verse 14, that, "I am come to make you understand what shall befall your people in the latter days:"

He went on to say in verse 21, "But I will show you that which is noted in the scripture of truth:"

It is my understanding that there were three arch angels to begin with. They were Gabriel, Lucifer and Michael. Lucifer was thrown out of heaven because he became ambitious and wanted to replace God. You can find some of the story in Isaiah 11. The "trinity" doctrine probably comes from Lucifer (whose name was changed to Satan when he was banished to the earth) based on the original three arch angels. Because when you begin to examine the trinity doctrine, it falls apart quickly. For instance, if the trinity doctrine is real, then Christ was not the son of God but rather the son of the other member of the trinity. Check Matthew 1:20. Joseph was instructed in a dream, saying, "Joseph, thou son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife: for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost." The spurious scripture which is quoted to justify the trinity heresy is I John 5:7 which says: “For there are three that bare record in heaven, the Father, the Word and the Holy Ghost” --- Holy spirit is a more accurate translation. Even using this scripture, we should be able to see when we compare it with Matthew 1:20, last part, “…fear not to take unto you Mary your wife for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost” (Spirit), --- that, if the trinity is true then Christ was the son of the Holy Spirit and not the son of God.

Just so we understand Daniel isn't another Nostradamas where you crank in your own interpretations, let's take it another step. To further verify the first three beasts, let's go to chapter 8 which gives us yet another vision of the prophet Daniel and will help in identifying the first three beasts or kingdoms. Starting in verse 1, "In the third year of the reign of king Belshazzar (grandson of Nebuchadnezzar), a vision appeared unto me, even unto me Daniel, after that which appeared unto me at the first.
2 "And I saw in a vision; and it came to pass, when I saw, that I was at Shushan in the palace, which is in the province of Elam; and I saw in a vision, and I was by the river of Ulai.
3 "Then I lifted up my eyes, and saw, and, behold, there stood before the river a ram which had two horns: and the two horns were high; but one was higher than the other, and the higher came up last.
4. "I saw the ram pushing westward, and northward, and southward; so that no beasts might stand before him, neither was there any that could deliver out of his hand; but he did according to his will, and became great.
5. "And as I was considering, behold, an he goat came from the west on the face of the whole earth, and touched not the ground: and the goat had a notable horn between his eyes.
6. "And he came to the ram that had two horns, which I had seen standing before the river, and ran unto him in the fury of his power.
7. "And I saw him come close unto the ram, and he was moved with choler against him, and smote the ram, and brake his two horns: and there was no power in the ram to stand before him, but he cast him down to the ground, and stamped upon him: and there was none that could deliver the ram out of his hand.
8. Therefore the he goat waxed very great: and when he was strong, the great horn was broken; and for it came up four notable ones toward the four winds of heaven.

To get the interpretation of this vision, we need only to drop on down to verse 19:

19."And he said, 'Behold, I will make thee know what shall be in the last end of the indignation: for at the time appointed the end shall be.
20 "The ram which thou saw having two horns, are the kings of Media and Persia. (The chest and arms of Nebuchadnezzar's dream)
21 "And the rough goat is the king of Grecia: (Alexander) and the great horn that is between his eyes is the first king (also the last).
22 "Now that being broken, whereas four stood up for it, four kingdoms shall stand up out of the nation, but not in his power."

When Alexander died young, his kingdom was divided among his top four generals, Ptolemy, Seleucus, Lysimachus and Cassander. What a beautiful fulfillment of this prophecy.

So many people say prophecy is confusing and they can't understand it, but
maybe it's because they haven't read it. Seems to me this interpretation given to Daniel is understandable and not only that, but when you compare it to the history, as it then happened, the accuracy is awesome.

Up to this point we have pretty well nailed down the identity of the first three beasts spoken of by Daniel. They were Babylon, Medo-Persia and Alexander's empire or as it was called in the 8th chapter, "the king of Grecia". But where do we go to find the fourth beast which "was dreadful and terrible"? Let's continue in chapter 11, verse 1. "Also I, in the first year of Darius the Mede, even I, stood to confirm and to strengthen him.
2 "And now will I show you the truth. Behold, there shall stand up yet three kings in Persia; (Cambyses, Pseudo Smerdis and Darius) and the fourth (Xerexes) shall be far richer than they all: and by his strength through his riches he shall stir up all against the realm of Grecia.
3 "And a mighty king (Alexander) shall stand up, that shall rule with great dominion, and do according to his will.
4 "And when he shall stand up, his kingdom shall be broken, and shall be divided toward the four winds of heaven; and not to his posterity, nor according to his dominion which he ruled for his kingdom shall be plucked up, even for others beside those.
5 "And the king of the south shall be strong…"

Ptolemy, one of Alexander's generals, took Egypt and Libya and became the king of the south. Seleucus took "…the whole region between the coast of Syria and the Euphrates" (per Marcius Willson's "Outlines of History", 1864 Ed.) which evolved into the "king of the north" as the Roman Empire. This was the beast in power during the time Christ walked the earth. This is also the beast spoken of in Daniel 7:25 that would "…think to change times (calendar) and laws." Did the Romans do this? Indeed they did. The Roman calendar was substituted for the Hebrew calendar. Was it an improvement? Hardly. The Hebrew calendar was made up of twelve months. The full moon was always on the same day of the month (somewhat reminiscent of what God said in Genesis 1:14, "…Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:") To keep the seasons in synch, a full month was added periodically to the Hebrew calendar. This calendar was built around a 19 year time cycle. The Roman calendar became a political football with Caesars vying for status by robbing another month to get a day added to the month named after himself. The seasons got so out of synch that in the sixteenth century, 10 days had to be dropped from the calendar.

What about laws? Did they change any laws - or rather, "…think to change laws…? In or around 325 AD, Constantine decided that keeping the Sabbath commanded by the God of Israel was not in keeping with the Roman law. It was to be considered Judaizing and punishable by death. Property of Judaizers, of course, would go to the Roman government. So…did they "…think to change laws?" Haven’t we been taught by our religious leaders that Christ “did away” with the law?

Those who contend that the law was done away (they only mean the second and fourth commandments because those are the ones that chaff) will tell you this was done at Christ's death and yet here we find legal action being taken by the Roman Government (or fourth beast that would "…think to change times and laws") almost 300 years after Christ's death. Why? Because Aryans, Gnostics and Jews were still observing those laws. They knew they were still in effect.

Why weren't we taught this in our public schools? Simply because those who have world dominion as their top priority have so organized as to be able to censor literature and substitute myths for history, not only in our school textbooks but in encyclopedias and through the news and entertain-ment medias.

Now, as you let this information sink in as to who the four kingdoms are, let’s cut to the present and debunk another myth and that is the ownership of the world bank.

Chapter 3

THE WORLD BANK

Are the Jews the moneychangers of the world and is this why they are so hated and driven from place to place? We all have been raised with the myth that the world bank (now diversified into a banking conglomerate presumably to sidestep American non-jesuit lawyers that are suing priests who like to play footsy with their young parishioners) is owned by a family of Edomite Jews named Rothschilds. I have never seen this myth stated in print but this is the understanding I grew up with and was unable to unravel the myth until about age 60.

It was my understanding that the Jews, through the world bank, financed both sides of the war effort in both WWI and WWII. War efforts bring big profits and prices are seldom questioned. So those financing this operation were getting filthy rich. For this reason, I had little sympathy with those who were exterminated by Adolph Hitler. I had come to believe that was a part of the curse their ancestors called down on them when they told Pontius Pilate, “Let his blood be on us and our children”. (Matthew 27:25) We shall show in a later chapter that it really has been and will debunk a major Jewish deception which the world has been seduced by.

It became obvious to me, long before I discovered the ownership of the world bank, that there had to be a connection between Judaism and Catholicism. Why? Because they both support some of the same myths. One of these is that the little nation of Israel today is the leftover of the Israel of old. This simply is not true! They both downplay the division of ancient Israel into two nations, both of which have impacted history dramatically. The books of I and II Kings are devoted to showing the division into the ten tribe nation that retained the name of Israel with their capital at Samaria and the nation of Jews, named Judah, who kept Jerusalem as their capital. The king lists for both nations are shown in the books of I and II Kings and I and II Chronicles. The nation of Israel had God’s protection removed because of idolatry and were taken captive by Shalmaneser of Assyria about 721-720 BC. Part of the story can be gleaned from II Kings chapter 17. The nation of Judah (Jews) kept up a pretense of living by the laws handed down through Moses for another 120 years or more until they also were butchered and survivors taken to Babylon by Nebuchadnezzar in several successive waves. The final sacking and burning of Jerusalem took place 587-586 BC.

It is my understanding that the little nation of Israel today is the result of a massive effort by the Vatican with Cardinal Spellman of New York being the point man in the setting up of the state of Israel. Why would avowed

“Jew haters” be instrumental in setting up a Jewish state? More on that in a later chapter, however, we should keep in mind that God used both Shalmaneser and Nebuchadnezzar as His rod of correction to chastise both kingdoms. Were they rulers of Godly nations? No! They were vicious! But they had the resources and they accomplished the mission. Perhaps we will be able to see that God still uses those with the resources to accomplish His purpose even today.

Did you ever wonder how much wealth the Vatican possesses? Have you noticed that even relatively small churches that gain a following of faithful parishioners can amass a sizeable fortune in a few years or decades? Since the Vatican has been gathering tithes from it’s parishioners for some 1500 years, wouldn’t you think they have a tidy sum stashed? When you add to that all that can be stolen through warfare and piracy, the estimate goes up.

Plus, in America, we have the mafia which seems to be above the law and prompts me to believe that the mafia is the Vatican CIA. How much wealth have they steered toward the Vatican? Are these valid questions? Can we even begin to see how much wealth the Vatican should be sitting on?

It appears that a group of Masonic Templars conducted an expedition to the Jerusalem area in about the 12th century AD for the purpose of recovering the gold that was stashed before Nebuchadnezzar’s invasion of Jerusalem in 587-586 BC. It appears that they came out with much gold that showed up in the building of cathedrals across Europe in the years that followed. But it was rumored that they found more than gold. Stories began to leak out that they had found records of the first century church! This was a threat to the presumed eccliastical authority of the Catholic Church and had to be dealt with. Jaques De Molay, leader of the Masonic Order, was captured by the Vatican and tortured and killed. What were they after? Was it the location of the tunnels that had been made in Jerusalem and the first century records?

Did they get them? There are some events of our day that would lead one to believe that they did but that is another story which I believe is covered in Grant Jeffrys’ book, “The Antichrist and the Prince of Darkness.”

One thing they did get (according to Jeffrys) is another “relic” and that is what they call the Turin Shroud. Jeffrys contends that it is the cloth put over De Molay’s face after he survived the first round of torture. Now they pass it off to a gullible public as the cloth that was over Christ’s face.

So who owns the world bank? The late F Tupper Saussy spent several years in prison in order to get you this information. His book, “Miracle on Main Street” was an expose on the money SCAM in America and so infuriated the ruling elite that it netted him a prison sentence on a trumped up tax evasion charge. While in prison, he formulated his next book which was “Rulers of Evil”. In it he quotes the Encyclopedia Judaica as saying, under the heading of “Rothschilds”, that they are “…keepers of the Vatican treasures.”

Doesn’t that bring into focus many of life’s mysteries?

Chapter 4

THE ASHKENAZI JEWS

For quite some time I puzzled over maps in my old history books, of the 1800s, about an area almost the size of the U.S. which stretched across the lower part of what is Russia today and was labeled “Kingdom of Khazars” or “Khazaria” depending on which book it was in. This was shown on the maps and yet was nowhere mentioned in the text. Why?

Maps have been a large part of my learning experience and much has been gleaned from names the cartographers had neglected to delete. So it was with this question in my mind that I read the book mentioned in this next paragraph.

This book was entitled “The Thirteenth Tribe” by Arthur Koestler. While Koestler brings out some very interesting points, the tribe of Judah was not the thirteenth tribe of Israel nor were those “...who say they are Jews but do lie.” His major premise is that 92% of the Jews of today are not of the tribe of Judah but rather descendents of Japheth through Gomer and his son Togarmah (and possibly Togarmah’s brother Ashkenaz). He lays out, with considerable supporting evidence, that those who call themselves Ashkenazi Jews came from the kingdom of the Khazars in the area just above (north of) the Black and Caspian Seas. He contends, also with considerable evidence, that they became “Jews” by choice of religion and not as descendents of Judah.

So then how did they begin to be called “Ashkenazi Jews?” Let me present it in his own words taken from chapter VIII, “RACE AND MYTH”:

The Jews of our times fall into two main divisions: Sephardim and Ashkenazim.

The Sephardim are descendents of the Jews who since antiquity had lived in Spain (in Hebrew Sepharad) until they were expelled at the end of the fifteenth century and settled in the countries bordering on the Mediter-ranean, the Balkans, and to a lesser extent in Western Europe. They spoke a Spanish-Hebrew dialect, Ladino and preserved their own traditions and religious rites. In the 1960s, the number of Sephardim was estimated at 500,000.

The Ashkenazim, at the same period, numbered about eleven million. Thus, in common parlance, Jew is practically synonymous with Ashkenazi Jew. But the term is misleading, for the Hebrew word Ashkenaz was in mediaeval rabbinical literature, applied to Germany --- thus contributing to the legend that modern Jewry originated on the Rhine. There is, however, no other term to refer to the non-Sephardic majority of contemporary Jewry.

“For the sake of piquantry it should be mentioned that the Ashkenaz of the Bible refers to a people living somewhere in the vicinity of Mount Ararat and Armenia. The name occurs in Genesis 10:3 and I Chronicles 1:6, as one of the sons of Gomer, who was a son of Japheth. Ashkenaz is also a brother of Togarmah (and a nephew of Magog) whom the Khazars, according to King Joseph, claimed as their ancestor. But worse was to come. For Ashkenaz is also named in Jeremiah 51:27, where the prophet calls his people and their allies to rise and destroy Babylon: ‘Call thee upon the kingdoms of Ararat, Minni and Ashkenaz.’ This passage was interpreted by the famous Saadiah Gaon, spiritual leader of Oriental Jewry in the tenth century, as a prophecy relating to his own times: Babylon symbolized the Caliphate of Baghdad, and the Ashkenaz who were to attack it were either the Khazars themselves or some allied tribe. Accordingly, says Poliak, some learned Khazar Jews, who heard of the Gaon’s ingenious arguments, called themselves Ashkenazim when they emigrated to Poland. It does not prove anything, but it adds to the confusion.”

In order to get a proper perspective on this in light of information uncovered in the past few centuries, perhaps we need to ask some pertinent questions. Let’s start with asking if the author quoted above knows what he is talking about in his summary quoted above. He said, “It does not prove anything but it adds to the confusion.” On the contrary, it may prove much.

Secondly perhaps, we should ask if the Oriental Rabbi Gaon’s interpretation of Jeremiah 51:27 was correct. As we address these two questions, I believe we may uncover something that has been overlooked by all the world’s religious gurus. Why? Because of the progressive deception of the past two millennia.

Let’s take the second question first: “Was Gaon’s interpretation correct?” Please turn to the chapter quoted and let’s read for ourselves. Is this really talking about the Babylon of Jeremiah’s day or are we talking about the Babylon of Revelation 18:2? Look at verse 3 of Jeremiah 51: “And will send unto Babylon fanners, that shall fan her, and shall empty her land: for in the day of trouble they shall be against her round about.” Now I very well realize there can be more than one “…day of trouble”, however, let’s continue. Verse 5 says, “For Israel hath not been forsaken, nor Judah of his God of the Lord of hosts; though their land was filled with sin against the Holy One of Israel.” Verse 6 continues: “Flee out of the midst of Babylon, and deliver every man his soul: be not cut off in her iniquity; for this is the time of the Lord’s vengeance; He will render unto her a recompence.” For an understanding of the time of the Lord’s vengeance, see Isaiah 34:8, 61:2, Jeremiah 50:15.

It appears to me that chapters 50 and 51 of Jeremiah go together and judging from the introduction (or setting) given in chapter 49, verse 39, the prophet has just shifted gears and is now talking about the last days of this present age. 49:39 “But it shall come to pass in the latter days that I will bring again the captivity of Elam, saith the LORD.” (Elam is Persia{Iraq per Josephus}.) This is the setting and introduction to Jeremiah 50 and 51.

Verse 1 of chapter 50 begins: “The word that the LORD spake against Babylon and against the land of the Chaldeans by Jeremiah the prophet.”
In former days Babylon was in the land of Elam but if you haven’t figured out where it is in the current world, you have homework to do. Perhaps the rest of this article will help to shed some light on it.

So we see in the introduction that Elam or Persia is going into captivity in the latter days. Is that happening in Iraq as I write this? Are we seeing prophecy fulfilled on CNN even if the news personnel don’t realize it?

Next we see an opening statement in 50:1 that the prophet Jeremiah is going to speak against Babylon and the land of the Chaldeans. These are one and the same. See Ezra 5:12. But is this the same Babylon that took the Jews captive in 587-6 BC? No! That Babylon has been gone for millennia. However, there is a Babylon that is to be destroyed in the end of days. See Revelation 18:2. Chapter 49:39 indicates that this is the Babylon/Chaldea being addressed by Jeremiah. So what does he have to say to them? Look at verse 3: “For out of the north there cometh up a nation against her which shall make her land desolate and none shall dwell therein; they shall remove, they shall depart, both man and beast.” Going on in verse 4: “In those days and in that time, saith the LORD, the children of Israel shall come, they and the children of Judah together, going and weeping: they shall go and seek the LORD their God.” Did this happen in Jeremiah’s day? Verse 5 continues: “They shall ask the way to Zion with their faces thitherward, saying, ‘Come, and let us join ourselves to the LORD in a perpetual covenant that shall not be forgotten.” Did this happen in Jeremiah’s day? Of course not --- and it was not happening in Saadiah Gaon’s day --- nor has it happened since then. Therefore his interpretation was incorrect which means he was a false prophet.

Is verse 8 a command from the Creator? “Remove out of the midst of Babylon…” If this is for us today, where are we to remove to? Continuing in verse 9: “For, lo, I will raise and cause to come up against Babylon an assembly of great nations from the north country and they shall set themselves in array against her…” So who lives in the north country and occupies a position in the nations today? Russia? But this is to be an “… assembly of great nations.” Who do you suppose would be willing to cast their lots with Russia? China? Afghanistan? India? Iran? Have you noticed that they are all north of us? (Across the pole).

Verse 13 is speaking of Chaldea (Babylon) and says: “Because of the wrath of the LORD it shall not be inhabited, but it shall be wholly desolate…” Surely we can’t mean America????

Let’s go on in Jeremiah 50, in verse 17: “Israel is a scattered sheep; the lions have driven him away: first the king of Assyria hath devoured him; and last this Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon hath broken his bones.”
18 “Therefore thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel; ‘Behold, I will punish the king of Babylon and his land, as I have punished the king of Assyria’.”
19 “And I will bring Israel again to his habitation, and he shall feed on Carmel and Bashan and his soul shall be satisfied upon mount Ephraim and Gilead.”

Are we looking at a time when the remnant of Israel will again be returned to the real estate promised to Abraham?

In the book of Ezekiel, starting in chapter 40, it talks about the re-establishment of planet earth. Chapter 47 shows the borders of the real estate that will again be given to Israel. It is approximately the size of the state of Georgia. This should suffice to show the amount of population reduction that is about to be achieved. This real estate is for Israel and not for those who claim to be Jews. The greatest hoax in all of history is being promoted in our day and is being promoted through every channel available --- CNN news, movies, books, colleges, public schools, and that is that the Israel of today is the Israel (or Judah) of the Old Testament. It simply is not true! Can we begin to understand what Christ was talking about when He spoke through the apostle John in Revelation 3:9? “Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews and are not but do lie…”

Going on in verse 20: “In those days, (the days when all this begins to happen) and in that time, saith the LORD, the iniquity of Israel shall be sought for, and there shall be none; and the sins of Judah, and they shall not be found: for I will pardon them whom I reserve.” And again I ask the question: Has this happened yet?

This is the setting for Jeremiah 51, now let’s move on down to the verse quoted by Koestler, which is 27, but to put it into context, let’s start in verse 24: “And I will render unto Babylon and to all the inhabitants of Chaldea all their evil that they have done in Zion in your sight, saith the Lord.”
25 “Behold, I am against you O destroying mountain, saith the Lord, which destroys all the earth; (Old Babylon?) and I will stretch out mine hand upon you, and roll you down from the rocks and will make you a burnt mountain.” (Government --- see Daniel 2:45)
26 “And they shall not take of you a stone for a corner, nor a stone for foundations; but you shall be desolate for ever, saith the Lord.”
27 “Set ye up a standard in the land, blow the trumpet among the nations, prepare the nations against her, call together against her the kingdoms of Ararat, Minni, and Ashkenaz…”

Now let’s address the first question: “Did the author know what he was talking about when he said, “It does not prove anything but adds to the confusion.”?

The last two millennia, those with world ruling ambitions have been busily engaged adding to the confusion by substituting myth for history not only of Rome but Ireland and England as well. Now American history is being dismantled and replaced with myth. e.g. “Columbus discovered America.”

For those who still think Jeremiah 51 is directed toward Babylon of old, I would direct your attention first to verse 42: “The sea is come upon Babylon: she is covered with the multitude of the waves thereof.” Ancient Babylon was more than a hundred miles from the sea.

Is it just possible that the Ashkenazi Jews (Jewish leadership per Koestler) are really the descendents of Ashkenaz rather than Togarmah? And is America the Babylon of Revelation 18:2? If so, this prophecy in Jeremiah would stand out in bold relief because who is it today that is destroying America? Is it the Ashkenazi Jews that control the media, the entertainment, the government and just about every phase of our lives? Do Chem trails begin to make more sense? Does the AIDS epidemic come into a more understandable perspective? Can we now see why the FDA even allows Sodium Cyanide (Prussiate) to be added to our salt as an “anti-caking agent”? Do abortion and the homosexual issues come into better focus? Is the federal government at war with America? Is Babylon being destroyed as we scramble for more governmental control? Is Jeremiah 51 being fulfilled before our very eyes?

The following was pulled from the internet and offers additional weight to the above.

Back to Medieval Source Book ORB Main Page Links to Other Medieval Sites

Medieval Sourcebook:
The Medieval Jewish Kingdom of the Khazars, 740-1259
________________________________________

[Marcus Introduction] About the year 740, many of the Khazars, a powerful Turkish tribe occupying the steppes of southern Russia, became converts to Judaism. More than two centuries later, the report of the existence of this Jewish kingdom aroused the curiosity of Hasdai ibn Shaprut (about 915-970). Ibn Shaprut was not only the personal physician of the Spanish Califs Abd-al-Rahman III (912-961) and his son Hakam II (961-976) but was also inspector-general of customs and an adviser in foreign affairs. To satisfy his curiosity he wrote to the ruler of the Khazars about 960 and some time later received an answer from Joseph, the reigning king. The letters of Hasdai and Joseph, both originally written in Hebrew, are given below in extract.

Fragments of the Khazar kingdom persisted into the thirteenth century.

See the Web site - Khazaria Information Center

1: THE LETTER OF RABBI HASDAI, SON OF ISAAC IBN SHAPRUT, TO THE KING OF THE KHAZARS, about 960

I, Hasdai, son of Isaac, son of Ezra, belonging to the exiled Jews of Jerusalem in Spain, a servant of my lord the King, bow to the earth before him and prostrate myself towards the abode of your Majesty from a distant land. I rejoice in your tranquillity and magnificence and stretch forth my hands to God in heaven that He may prolong your reign in Israel....

Praise be to the beneficent God for His mercy towards me! Kings of the earth, to whom his [Abd-al-Rahman's] magnificence and power are known, bring gifts to him, conciliating his favor by costly presents, such as the King of the Franks, the King of the Gebalim, who are Germans, the King of Constantinople, and others. All their gifts pass through my hands, and I am charged with making gifts in return. [Ibn Shaprut, who knew several languages, received these embassies.] Let my lips express praise to the God of heaven, who so far extends His lovingkindness towards me, without any merit of my own, but in the fullness of His mercies!

I always ask the ambassadors of these monarchs who bring gifts about our brethren the Israelites, the remnant of the captivity, whether they have heard anything concerning the deliverance of those who have languished in bondage and have found no rest. [He was anxious to know if the "lost ten tribes" existed as an independent Jewish state anywhere.]

At length mercantile emissaries of Khorasan [a land southeast of the Caspian Sea] told me that there is a kingdom of Jews which is called Al-Chazar. But I did not believe these words for I thought that they told me such things to procure my goodwill and favor. I was therefore wondering, till the ambassadors of Constantinople came [between 944 and 949] with presents and a letter from their king to our king, and I interrogated them concerning this matter,

They answered me: "It is quite true, and the name of that kingdom is Al-Chazar. It is a fifteen days' journey by sea from Constantinople, but by land many nations intervene between us; the name of the king now reigning is Joseph; ships sometimes come from their country to ours bringing fish, skins, and wares of every kind [The Khazars, great traders, got their wares from the Russians to the north.] The men are our confederates and are honored by us; there is communication between us by embassies and mutual gifts; they are very powerful; they maintain numerous armies with which they occasionally engage in expeditions." When I heard this report I was encouraged, my hands were strengthened, and my hope was confirmed. Thereupon I bowed down and adored the God of heaven. [Hasdai was happy: Christians could no longer say the Jews were without a country as a punishment for their rejection of Jesus.]....

I pray for the health of my lord the King, of his family, and of his house, and that his throne may be established for ever. Let his days and his sons' days be prolonged in the midst of Israel!

II. THE LETTER OF JOSEPH THE KING, SON OF AARON THE KING, THE TURK-MAY HIS CREATOR PRESERVE HIM TO THE HEAD OF THE ASSEMBLY, HASDAI, THE SON OF ISAAC, SON OF EZRA-about 960

....I wish to inform you that your beautifully phrased letter was given us by Isaac, son of Eliezer, a Jew of the land of Germany [Isaac carried it through Germany, Hungary, and Russia to Khazaria.] You made us happy and we are delighted with your understanding and wisdom.... Let us, therefore, renew the diplomatic relations that once obtained between our fathers, and let us transmit this heritage to our children. [Joseph believed the Khazars had once had diplomatic relations with the Spanish Arabs.]

You ask us also in your epistle: "Of what people, of what family, and of what tribe are you?" Know that we are descended from Japhet, through his son Togarmah. [In Jewish literature Togarmah is the father of all the Turks.] I have found in the genealogical books of my ancestors that Togarmah had ten sons. These are their names: the eldest was Ujur, the second Tauris, the third Avar, the fourth Uauz, the fifth Bizal, the sixth Tarna, the seventh Khazar, the eighth Janur, the ninth Bulgar, the tenth Sawir. [These are the mythical founders of tribes that once lived in the neighborhood of the Black and Caspian Seas.] I am a descendant of Khazar, the seventh son.

I have a record that although our fathers were few in number, the Holy One blessed be He, gave them strength, power, and might so that they were able to carry on war after war with many nations who were more powerful and numerous than they. By the help of God they drove them out and took possession of their country. Upon some of them they have imposed forced labor even to this very day. The land [along the Volga] in which I now live was formerly occupied by the Bulgarians. Our ancestors, the Khazars, came and fought with them, and, although these Bulgarians were as numerous as the sand on the shores of the sea, they could not withstand the Khazars. So they left their country and fled while the Khazars pursued them as far as the Danube River. Up to this very day the Bulgars camp along the Danube and are close to Constantinople. The Khazars have occupied their land up till now. [The Khazars, known since the second century, dominated southern Russia during the early Middle Ages. ]

After this, several generations passed until a certain King arose whose name was Bulan. He was a wise and God-fearing man, trusting in his Creator with all his heart. He expelled the wizards and idolaters from the land and took refuge in the shadow of his wings . . . After this his fame was spread broadcast. [Bulan probably ruled about 740. He was the first Jewish Khazar ruler. ] The king of the Byzantines and the Arabs who had heard of him sent their envoys and ambassadors with great riches and many great presents to the King as well as some of their wise men with the object of converting him to their own religion. [The Byzantines and Arabs hoped to stop the raids of the Khazars by converting them.]

But the King-may his soul be bound up in the bundle of life With the Lord his God-being wise, sent for a learned Israelite. the King searched, inquired, and investigated carefully and brought the sages together that they might argue about their respective religions. Each of them refuted, however, the arguments of his opponent so that they could not agree. When the King saw this he said to them: "Go home, but return to me on the third day…"

On the third day he called all the sages together and said to them. "Speak and argue with one another and make clear to me which is the best religion." They began to dispute with one another without arriving at any results until the King said to the Christian priest "What do you think? Of the religion of the Jews and the Muslims, which is to be preferred?" The priest answered: "The religion of the Israelites is better than that of the Muslims."

The King then asked the kadi [a Muslim judge and scholar]: "What do you say? Is the religion of the Israelites, or that of the Christians preferable?" The kadi answered: "The religion of the Israelites is preferable."

Upon this the King said: "If this is so, you both have admitted with your own mouths that the religion of the Israelites is better Wherefore, trusting in the mercies of God and the power of the Almighty, I choose the religion of Israel, that is, the religion of Abraham. If that God in whom I trust, and in the shadow of whose wings I find refuge, will aid me, He can give me without labor the money, the gold, and the silver which you have promised me. As for you all, go now in peace to your land." [This account of Bulan's conversion is apparently legendary. Another Hebrew source tells us that Judaism was adopted by the Khazars when a Jewish general was made king. Jewish fugitives from Constantinople also made many converts in Khazaria.]

From that time on the Almighty helped Bulan, fortified him, and strengthened him. He circumcised himself, his servants, attendants, and ail his people. [Arabic sources say the royal family and nobility became Jews, but only a part of the people.] Then Bulan sent for and brought from all places wise men of Israel who interpreted the Torah for him and arranged the precepts in order, and up to this very day we have been subject to this religion. May God's name be blessed and may His remembrance be exalted for ever!

Since that day [about 740], when my fathers entered into this religion, the God of Israel has humbled all of their enemies, subjecting every folk and tongue round about them, whether Christian, Muslim, or pagan. No one has been able to stand before them to this day [about 960]. All of them are tributary. [But only about ten years later Joseph was defeated by the Russians, 969.]

After the days of Bulan there arose one of his descendants, a king Obodiah by name, who reorganized the kingdom and established the Jewish religion properly and correctly. He built synagogues and schools, brought in Jewish scholars, and rewarded them with gold and silver. [:The Jewish scholars could have come from Bagdad and Constantinople.] They explained to him the Bible, Mishnah, Talmud and the order of divine services. The King was a man who revered and loved the Torah. He was one of the true servants of God. May the Divine Spirit give him rest!

He was succeeded by Hezekiah, his son; next to him was Manasseh, his son; next to him was Hanukkah, the brother of Obadiah; next Isaac, his son; afterwards, his son Zebulun; then his son Moses; then his son Nissi; then his son Aaron; then his son Menahem; then his son Benjamin; then his son Aaron II; and I, Joseph, the son of Aaron the King, am King, the son of a King, and the descendant of kings. [These kings probably had Turkish names besides their Hebrew ones.] No stranger can occupy the throne of my ancestors: the son succeeds the father. This has been our custom and the custom of our forefathers since they have come into existence. May it be the gracious will of Him who appoints all kings that the throne of my kingdom shall endure to all eternity.

You have also asked me about the affairs of my country and the extent of my empire. I wish to inform you that I dwell by the banks of the river known as the Itil [Volga]. At the mouth of the river lies the Caspian Sea. The headwaters of the river turn eastward, a journey of four months distance.

Alongside the river dwell many tribes in cities and towns, in open as well as fortified places.... Bear in mind that I dwell at the delta of the Itil and, by God's help, I guard the mouth of the river and do not permit the Russians who come in ships to enter into the Caspian so as to get at the Muslims. Nor do I allow any of their [the Muslims'] enemies who come by land to penetrate as far as Derbend [Derbend, an Arab city, was the gate through which the nomads in Russia hoped to rush through and raid the rich towns of Asia Minor.] I have to wage war with them, for if I would give them any chance at all they would lay waste the whole land of the Muslims as far as Baghdad. . .

You have also asked me about the place where I live. I wish to inform you that, by the grace of God, I dwell alongside this river On which there are situated three capital cities. The queen dwells in one of them; it is my birthplace. It is quite large, built round like a Circle, the diameter of which is fifty parasangs. [The King lived in an island in the Volga; there were also towns on both banks. ]

Jews, Christians, and Moslems live in the second city. Besides these there are many slaves of all nations in it. It is of medium size, eight square parasangs in length and breadth.

In the third I reside with my princes, officers, servants, cupbearers and those who are close to me. It is round in shape and its diameter is three parasangs. The river flows within its walls. This is my residence during the winter. From the month of Nisan [March-April] on we leave the city and each one goes forth to his vineyards, fields and to his work....

You mention in your letter that you yearn to see my face. I also would very much like to see your pleasant countenance and the rare beauty of your wisdom and greatness. Would that it were according to your word. If it were granted me to be associated with you and to behold your honored, charming, and pleasant countenance then you would be my father and I your son. According to your command would all my people be ruled, and according to your word and discreet counsel would I conduct all my affairs. Farewell.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
REFERENCES TO TEXTBOOKS
Roth, pp. 158-159, 264-265.
READINGS FOR ADVANCED STUDENTS
Graetz, 111, pp. 138-141, 214-230; Graetz-Rhine, III, pp. 99 130; Margolis and Marx, pp. 308-312, 525-526
Dubnow, S. M., History of the Jews in Russia and Poland, 1, "The Kingdom of the Khazars," pp. 19-29.
Frazer, J. G., Garnered Sheaves, Part I, Chap. x, "The Killing of the Khazar Kings."
Mann, J., Texts and Studies in Jewish History and Literature, 1, pp. 3ff:? "Hisdai ibn Shaprut and His Diplomatic Intervention on Behalf of the Jews in Christian Europe."
JE, "Chazars"; "Hasdai abn Yusuf ibn Shaprut."

ADDITIONAL SOURCE MATERIALS IN ENGLISH
Halper, B., Post-Biblical Hebrew Literature, "The Four Captives," II, pp. 123-126. A legendary description of the arrival of Rabbi Moses b. Enoch, One of the first Jewish scholars to come to Arabic Spain. He was a contemporary of Hasdai ibn Shaprut. ;
Miscellany of Hebrew Literature, I, pp. g2ff.: "The Epistle of R. Chisdai, Son of Isaac (of Blessed Memory), to the King of the Cusars," and "the Answer of Joseph, King of the Togarmi, etc." Another translation of the king's answer has been made by H. Hirschfeld, Judah Hallevi's Kitab al al Khazari, 1931, pp, :72-279.
SOURCE: Jacob Marcus, The Jew in the Medieval World: A Sourcebook, 315-1791, (New York: JPS, 1938), 227-232. Some slight spelling modifications have been made.
Later printings of this text (e.g. by Atheneum, 1969, 1972, 1978) do not indicate that the copyright was renewed)
________________________________________
This text is part of the Internet Medieval Source Book. The Sourcebook is a collection of public domain and copy-permitted texts related to medieval and Byzantine history.

Unless otherwise indicated the specific electronic form of the document is copyright. Permission is granted for electronic copying, distribution in print form for educational purposes and personal use. If you do reduplicate the document, indicate the source. No permission is granted for commercial use.
© Paul Halsall October 1997
halsall@murray.fordham.edu

Chapter 5

WHY THE HOLOCAUST?

I have read many accounts purporting to answer the question posed by the title of this chapter, most of them written by Jews or pre censored by the Jewish owned American media. Any who even cast doubt on the Jewish version of the “holocaust myth” are ridiculed by the media and branded an “anti-Semite”, whatever that is. The story of the “Christian Holocaust”, perpetrated by the American educated Jews that took over Russia in what history labels the Bolshevik Revolution, with numbers four times those of the Jewish holocaust, is simply not told.

The story that follows is by far the best account I have read and is told by an old Jew that was in a position to get the facts and put them in proper perspective. It may change your views concerning the “Holocaust”.

The Amazing Warnings
Of Benjamin Freedman
A Jewish Defector Warns America

Introductory Note

Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing individuals of the 20th century. Born in 1890, he was a successful Jewish businessman of New York City at one time principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with organized Jewry after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent the remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States.

Mr. Freedman knew what he was talking about because he had been an insider at the highest levels of Jewish organizations and Jewish machinations to gain power over our nation. Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, John F. Kennedy, and many more movers and shakers of our times.

This speech was given before a patriotic audience in 1961 at the Willard Hotel, Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley's patriotic newspaper of that time, Common Sense. Though in some minor ways this wide-ranging and extemporaneous speech has become dated, Mr. Freedman's essential message to us -- his warning to the West -- is more urgent than ever before. -- K.A.S.

Benjamin Freedman Speaks:

Here in the United States, the Zionists and their co-religionists have complete control of our government. For many reasons, too many and too complex to go into here at this time, the Zionists and their co-religionists rule these United States as though they were the absolute monarchs of this country. Now you may say that is a very broad statement, but let me show you what happened while we were all asleep.

What happened? World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. There are few people here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on one side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.

Within two years Germany had won that war: not only won it nominally, but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean. Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, with one week's food supply -- and after that, starvation. At that time, the French army had mutinied. They had lost 600,000 of the flower of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army was defecting, they were picking up their toys and going home, they didn't want to play war anymore, they didn't like the Czar. And the Italian army had collapsed.

Not a shot had been fired on German soil. Not one enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany. And yet, Germany was offering England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: "Let's call the war off, and let everything be as it was before the war started." England, in the summer of 1916 was considering that -- seriously. They had no choice. It was either accepting this negotiated peace that Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on with the war and being totally defeated.

While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and -- I am going to be brief because it's a long story, but I have all the documents to prove any statement that I make -- they said: "Look here. You can yet win this war. You don't have to give up. You don't have to accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can win this war if the United States will come in as your ally." The United States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were young; we were rich; we were powerful. They told England: "We will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally, to fight with you on your side, if you will promise us Palestine after you win the war."

In other words, they made this deal: "We will get the United States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay is Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey." Now England had as much right to promise Palestine to anybody, as the United States would have to promise Japan to Ireland for any reason whatsoever. It's absolutely absurd that Great Britain, that never had any connection or any interest or any right in what is known as Palestine should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the Zionists for bringing the United States into the war. However, they did make that promise, in October of 1916. And shortly after that -- I don't know how many here remember it -- the United States, which was almost totally pro-German, entered the war as Britain's ally.

I say that the United States was almost totally pro-German because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews, all the media of mass communications in this country were controlled by Jews; and they, the Jews, were pro-German. They were pro-German because many of them had come from Germany, and also they wanted to see Germany lick the Czar. The Jews didn't like the Czar, and they didn't want Russia to win this war. These German-Jew bankers, like Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States refused to finance France or England to the extent of one dollar. They stood aside and they said: "As long as France and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent!" But they poured money into Germany, they fought beside Germany against Russia, trying to lick the Czarist regime.

Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting Palestine, went to England and they made this deal. At that time, everything changed, like a traffic light that changes from red to green. Where the newspapers had been all pro-German, where they'd been telling the people of the difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects, all of a sudden the Germans were no good. They were villains. They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting off babies' hands. They were no good. Shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared war on Germany.

The Zionists in London had sent cables to the United States, to Justice Brandeis, saying "Go to work on President Wilson. We're getting from England what we want. Now you go to work on President Wilson and get the United States into the war." That's how the United States got into the war. We had no more interest in it; we had no more right to be in it than we have to be on the moon tonight instead of in this room. There was absolutely no reason for World War I to be our war. We were railroaded into -- if I can be vulgar, we were suckered into -- that war merely so that the Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine. That is something that the people of the United States have never been told. They never knew why we went into World War I. (Author’s note: Was God setting the stage even then for bringing all nations to the Valley of Jehoshaphat for judgment? Joel 3:1-2, 14)

After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they said: "Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let's have something in writing that shows that you are going to keep your bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war." They didn't know whether the war would last another year or another ten years. So they started to work out a receipt. The receipt took the form of a letter, which was worded in very cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn't know what it was all about. And that was called the Balfour Declaration.

The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain's promise to pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United States into the war. So this great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill. I don't think I could make it more emphatic than that.

That is where all the trouble started. The United States got in the war. The United States crushed Germany. You know what happened. When the war ended, and the Germans went to Paris for the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 there were 117 Jews there, as a delegation representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. I was there: I ought to know.

Now what happened? The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these nations who claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, said, "How about Palestine for us?" And they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration. So the Germans, for the first time realized, "Oh, so that was the game! That's why the United States came into the war." The Germans for the first time realized that they were defeated, they suffered the terrific reparations that were slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted Palestine and were determined to get it at any cost.

That brings us to another very interesting point. When the Germans realized this, they naturally resented it. Up to that time, the Jews had never been better off in any country in the world than they had been in Germany. You had Mr. Rathenau there, who was maybe 100 times as important in industry and finance as is Bernard Baruch in this country. You had Mr. Balin, who owned the two big steamship lines, the North German Lloyd's and the Hamburg-American Lines. You had Mr. Bleichroder, who was the banker for the Hohenzollern family. You had the Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the big merchant bankers -- the biggest in the world. The Jews were doing very well in Germany. No question about that. The Germans felt: "Well, that was quite a sellout."

It was a sellout that might be compared to this hypothetical situation: Suppose the United States was at war with the Soviet Union. And we were winning. And we told the Soviet Union: "Well, let's quit. We offer you peace terms. Let's forget the whole thing." And all of a sudden Red China came into the war as an ally of the Soviet Union. And throwing them into the war brought about our defeat. A crushing defeat, with reparations the likes of which man's imagination cannot encompass. Imagine, then, after that defeat, if we found out that it was the Chinese in this country, our Chinese citizens, who all the time we had thought were loyal citizens working with us, were selling us out to the Soviet Union and that it was through them that Red China was brought into the war against us. How would we feel, then, in the United States against Chinese? I don't think that one of them would dare show his face on any street. There wouldn't be enough convenient lampposts to take care of them. Imagine how we would feel.

Well, that's how the Germans felt towards these Jews. They'd been so nice to them: from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in Russia failed, and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to Germany. And Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated very nicely. And here they had sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other than the fact that they wanted Palestine as a so-called "Jewish commonwealth."

Now Nahum Sokolow, and all the great leaders and great names that you read about in connection with Zionism today, in 1919, 1920, 1921, 1922, and 1923 wrote in all their papers -- and the press was filled with their statements -- that the feeling against the Jews in Germany is due to the fact that they realized that this great defeat was brought about by Jewish intercession in bringing the United States into the war. The Jews themselves admitted that. It wasn't that the Germans in 1919 discovered that a glass of Jewish blood tasted better than Coca-Cola or Muenschner Beer. There was no religious feeling. There was no sentiment against those people merely on account of their religious belief. It was all political. It was economic. It was anything but religious. Nobody cared in Germany whether a Jew went home and pulled down the shades and said "Shema 'Yisroel" or "Our Father." Nobody cared in Germany any more than they do in the United States. Now this feeling that developed later in Germany was due to one thing: the Germans held the Jews responsible for their crushing defeat.

And World War I had been started against Germany for no reason for which Germany was responsible. They were guilty of nothing. Only of being successful. They built up a big navy. They built up world trade. You must remember that Germany at the time of the French Revolution consisted of 300 small city-states, principalities, dukedoms, and so forth. Three hundred separate little political entities. And between that time, between the times of Napoleon and Bismarck, they were consolidated into one state. And within 50 years they became one of the world's great powers. Their navy was rivaling Great Britain's, they were doing business all over the world, they could undersell anybody, they could make better products. What happened as a result of that?

There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia to slap down Germany. There isn't one historian in the world who can find a valid reason why those three countries decided to wipe Germany off the map politically.

When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat, they naturally resented it. But not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed. Not a single hair. Professor Tansill, of Georgetown University, who had access to all the secret papers of the State Department, wrote in his book, and quoted from a State Department document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a Jew whom Cordell Hull sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called camps of political prisoners, who wrote back that he found them in very fine condition. They were in excellent shape, with everybody treated well. And they were filled with Communists. Well, a lot of them were Jews, because the Jews happened to comprise about 98 per cent of the Communists in Europe at that time. And there were some priests there, and ministers, and labor leaders, and Masons, and others who had international affiliations.

Some background is in order: In 1918-1919 the Communists took over Bavaria for a few days. Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht and a group of other Jews took over the government for three days. In fact, when the Kaiser ended the war he fled to Holland because he thought the Communists were going to take over Germany as they did Russia and that he was going to meet the same fate as the Czar. So he fled to Holland for safety, for security. After the Communist threat in Germany was quashed, the Jews were still working, trying to get back into their former status, and the Germans fought them in every way they could without hurting a single hair on anyone's head. They fought them the same way that, in this country, the Prohibitionists fought anyone who was interested in liquor. They didn't fight one another with pistols. Well, that's the way they were fighting the Jews in Germany. And at that time, mind you, there were 80 to 90 million Germans, and there were only 460,000 Jews. About one half of one per cent of the population of Germany were Jews. And yet they controlled all the press, and they controlled most of the economy because they had come in with cheap money when the mark was devalued and bought up practically everything. (Author’s note: Where did they get the money??? Was it from the world bank? So who owned the world bank, the Rothschilds? No! If we go to the Encyclopedia Judaica and turn to the article “Rothschilds”, we find they are “…keepers of the Vatican treasures.” So we have a connection between Judaism and Catholicism where the Catholics pull the strings and the Jews become the scapegoats. Very clever move by Catholics.)

The Jews tried to keep a lid on this fact. They didn't want the world to really understand that they had sold out Germany, and that the Germans resented that.

The Germans took appropriate action against the Jews. They, shall I say, discriminated against them wherever they could. They shunned them. The same way that we would shun the Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics, or anyone in this country who had sold us out to an enemy and brought about our defeat.

After a while, the Jews of the world called a meeting in Amsterdam. Jews from every country in the world attended this meeting in July 1933. And they said to Germany: "You fire Hitler, and you put every Jew back into his former position, whether he was a Communist or no matter what he was. You can't treat us that way. And we, the Jews of the world, are serving an ultimatum upon you." You can imagine what the Germans told them. So what did the Jews do?

In 1933, when Germany refused to surrender to the world conference of Jews in Amsterdam, the conference broke up, and Mr. Samuel Untermyer, who was the head of the American delegation and the president of the whole conference, came to the United States and went from the steamer to the studios of the Columbia Broadcasting System and made a radio broadcast throughout the United States in which he in effect said, "The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against them. That will destroy them because they are dependent upon their export business."

And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany's food supply had to be imported, and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported. So if Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany's population would have to starve. There was just not enough food for more than one third of the population. Now in this declaration, which I have here, and which was printed in the New York Times on August 7, 1933, Mr. Samuel Untermyer boldly stated that "this economic boycott is our means of self-defense. President Roosevelt has advocated its use in the National Recovery Administration," which some of you may remember, where everybody was to be boycotted unless he followed the rules laid down by the New Deal, and which was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of that time. Nevertheless, the Jews of the world declared a boycott against Germany, and it was so effective that you couldn't find one thing in any store anywhere in the world with the words "Made in Germany" on it. In fact, an executive of the Woolworth Company told me that they had to dump millions of dollars worth of crockery and dishes into the river; that their stores were boycotted if anyone came in and found a dish marked "made in Germany," they were picketed with signs saying "Hitler," "murderer," and so forth, something like these sit-ins that are taking place in the South.

At a store belonging to the R. H. Macy chain, which was controlled by a family called Strauss who also happen to be Jews, a woman found stockings there which came from Chemnitz, marked "Made in Germany." Well, they were cotton stockings and they may have been there 20 years, since I've been observing women's legs for many years and it's been a long time since I've seen any cotton stockings on them. I saw Macy's boycotted, with hundreds of people walking around with signs saying "murderers," "Hitlerites," and so forth.

Now up to that time, not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt in Germany. There was no suffering, there was no starvation, there was no murder, there was nothing.

Naturally, the Germans said, "Who are these people to declare a boycott against us and throw all our people out of work, and make our industries come to a standstill? Who are they to do that to us?" They naturally resented it. Certainly they painted swastikas on stores owned by Jews. Why should a German go in and give his money to a storekeeper who was part of a boycott that was going to starve Germany into surrendering to the Jews of the world, who were going to dictate who their premier or chancellor was to be? Well, it was ridiculous.

The boycott continued for some time, but it wasn't until 1938, when a young Jew from Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot a German official, that the Germans really started to get rough with the Jews in Germany. And you found them then breaking windows and having street fights and so forth.

Now I don't like to use the word "anti-Semitism" because it's meaningless, but it means something to you still, so I'll have to use it. The only reason that there was any feeling in Germany against Jews was that they were responsible for World War I and for this world-wide boycott. Ultimately they were also responsible for World War II, because after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for the Jews and Germany to lock horns in a war to see which one was going to survive. In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans had decided that Europe is going to be Christian or Communist: (Author’s note: It is evident that this author equates Catholicism with Christianity.) there is no in between. And the Germans decided they were going to keep it Christian if possible. And they started to re-arm. In November 1933 the United States recognized the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was becoming very powerful, and Germany realized that "Our turn was going to come soon, unless we are strong." The same as we in this country are saying today, "Our turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong." Our government is spending 83 or 84 billion dollars for defense. Defense against whom? Defense against 40,000 little Jews in Moscow that took over Russia, and then, in their devious ways, took over control of many other countries of the world.

For this country now to be on the verge of a Third World War, from which we cannot emerge a victor, is something that staggers my imagination. I know that nuclear bombs are measured in terms of megatons. A megaton is a term used to describe one million tons of TNT. Our nuclear bombs had a capacity of 10 megatons, or 10 million tons of TNT, when they were first developed. Now, the nuclear bombs that are being developed have a capacity of 200 megatons, and God knows how many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have.

What do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may develop into a nuclear war, humanity is finished. Why might such a war take place? It will take place as the curtain goes up on Act 3: Act 1 was World War I, Act 2 was World War II, Act 3 is going to be World War III. The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are determined that they are going to again use the United States to help them permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their world government. That is just as true as I am standing here. Not alone have I read it, but many here have also read it, and it is known all over the world.

What are we going to do? The life you save may be your son's. Your boys may be on their way to that war tonight; and you don't know it any more than you knew that in 1916 in London the Zionists made a deal with the British War Cabinet to send your sons to war in Europe. Did you know it at that time? Not a person in the United States knew it. You weren't permitted to know it. Who knew it? President Wilson knew it. Colonel House knew it. Other insiders knew it.

Did I know it? I had a pretty good idea of what was going on: I was liaison to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign when President Wilson was elected, and there was talk around the office there. I was "confidential man" to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., who was chairman of the Finance Committee, and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells, the treasurer. So I sat in these meetings with President Wilson at the head of the table, and all the others, and I heard them drum into President Wilson's brain the graduated income tax and what has become the Federal Reserve, and I heard them indoctrinate him with the Zionist movement. Justice Brandeis and President Wilson were just as close as the two fingers on this hand. President Woodrow Wilson was just as incompetent when it came to determining what was going on as a newborn baby. That is how they got us into World War I, while we all slept. They sent our boys over there to be slaughtered. For what? So the Jews can have Palestine as their "commonwealth." They've fooled you so much that you don't know whether you're coming or going.

Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, "Gentlemen, any witness who you find has told a single lie, you can disregard all his testimony." I don't know what state you come from, but in New York state that is the way a judge addresses a jury. If that witness told one lie, disregard his testimony.

What are the facts about the Jews? (I call them Jews to you, because they are known as "Jews". I don't call them Jews myself. I refer to them as "so-called Jews", because I know what they are). The eastern European Jews, who form 92 per cent of the world's population of those people who call themselves "Jews", were originally Khazars. They were a warlike tribe who lived deep in the heart of Asia. And they were so warlike that even the Asiatics drove them out of Asia into eastern Europe. They set up a large Khazar kingdom of 800,000 square miles. At the time, Russia did not exist, nor did many other European countries. The Khazar kingdom was the biggest country in all Europe -- so big and so powerful that when the other monarchs wanted to go to war, the Khazars would lend them 40,000 soldiers. That's how big and powerful they were.

They were phallic worshippers, which is filthy and I do not want to go into the details of that now. But that was their religion, as it was also the religion of many other pagans and barbarians elsewhere in the world. The Khazar king became so disgusted with the degeneracy of his kingdom that he decided to adopt a so-called monotheistic faith -- either Christianity, Islam, or what is known today as Judaism, which is really Talmudism. By spinning a top, and calling out "eeny, meeny, miney, moe," he picked out so-called Judaism. And that became the state religion. He sent down to the Talmudic schools of Pumbedita and Sura and brought up thousands of rabbis, and opened up synagogues and schools, and his people became what we call "Jews".

There wasn't one of them who had an ancestor who ever put a toe in the Holy Land. Not only in Old Testament history, but back to the beginning of time. Not one of them! And yet they come to the Christians and ask us to support their armed insurrections in Palestine by saying, "You want to help repatriate God's Chosen People to their Promised Land, their ancestral home, don't you? It's your Christian duty. We gave you one of our boys as your Lord and Savior. You now go to church on Sunday, and you kneel and you worship a Jew, and we're Jews."

But they are pagan Khazars who were converted just the same as the Irish were converted. It is as ridiculous to call them "people of the Holy Land," as it would be to call the 54 million Chinese Moslems "Arabs." Mohammed only died in 620 A.D., and since then 54 million Chinese have accepted Islam as their religious belief. Now imagine, in China, 2,000 miles away from Arabia, from Mecca and Mohammed's birthplace. Imagine if the 54 million Chinese decided to call themselves "Arabs." You would say they were lunatics. Anyone who believes that those 54 million Chinese are Arabs must be crazy. All they did was adopt as a religious faith a belief that had its origin in Mecca, in Arabia. The same as the Irish. When the Irish became Christians, nobody dumped them in the ocean and imported to the Holy Land a new crop of inhabitants. They hadn't become a different people. They were the same people, but they had accepted Christianity as a religious faith.

These Khazars, these pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns, were a Mongoloid race who were forced out of Asia into eastern Europe. Because their king took the Talmudic faith, they had no choice in the matter. Just the same as in Spain: If the king was Catholic, everybody had to be a Catholic. If not, you had to get out of Spain. So the Khazars became what we call today "Jews".

Now imagine how silly it was for the great Christian countries of the world to say, "We're going to use our power and prestige to repatriate God's Chosen People to their ancestral homeland, their Promised Land." Could there be a bigger lie than that? Because they control the newspapers, the magazines, the radio, the television, the book publishing business, and because they have the ministers in the pulpit and the politicians on the soapboxes talking the same language, it is not too surprising that you believe that lie. You'd believe black is white if you heard it often enough. You wouldn't call black black anymore -- you'd start to call black white. And nobody could blame you. That is one of the great lies of history. It is the foundation of all the misery that has befallen the world.

Do you know what Jews do on the Day of Atonement, that you think is so sacred to them? I was one of them. This is not hearsay. I'm not here to be a rabble-rouser. I'm here to give you facts. When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a synagogue, you stand up for the very first prayer that you recite. It is the only prayer for which you stand. You repeat three times a short prayer called the http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/facts2.htm#Kol Nidre Kol Nidre.

In that prayer, you enter into an agreement with God Almighty that any oath, vow, or pledge that you may make during the next twelve months shall be null and void. The oath shall not be an oath; the vow shall not be a vow; the pledge shall not be a pledge. They shall have no force or effect. And further, the Talmud teaches that whenever you take an oath, vow, or pledge, you are to remember the http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/facts1.htm#Nedarim23a-23b> Kol Nidre prayer that you recited on the Day of Atonement, and you are exempted from fulfilling them. How much can you depend on their loyalty? You can depend upon their loyalty as much as the Germans depended upon it in 1916. We are going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and for the same reason.

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/benjamin.htm

FACTS ARE FACTS - III

The greatest historian on the origin and the history of the so-called or self-styled "Jews" in eastern Europe was Professor H. Graetz, himself a so-called or self-styled "Jew." Professor H. Graetz points out in his famous "History of the Jews" that when so-called or self-styled "Jews" in other countries heard a rumor about so-called or self-styled "Jews" in the Khazar Kingdom they believed these converted Khazars to be the "lost ten tribes." These rumors were no doubt responsible for the legend which grew up that Palestine was the "homeland" of the converted Khazars. On page 141 in his "History of the Jews" Professor H. Graetz states:

"The Chazars professed a coarse religion, which was combined with sensuality and lewdness...After Obadia came a long series of Jewish Chagans (kings), for ACCORDING TO A FUNDAMENTAL LAW OF THE STATE ONLY JEWISH RULERS WERE PERMITTED TO ASCEND THE THRONE. (Author’s note: “The scepter shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet…” Gen 49:10) For some time THE JEWS OF OTHER COUNTRIES HAD NO KNOWLEDGE OF THE CONVERSION OF THIS POWERFUL KINGDOM TO JUDAISM, and when at last a vague rumor to this effect reached them, THEY WERE OF THE OPINION THAT CHAZARIA WAS PEOPLED BY THE REMNANT OF THE FORMER TEN TRIBES."

When the Khazars in the 1st century B.C. invaded eastern Europe their mother-tongue was an Asiatic language, referred to in the Jewish Encyclopedia as the "Khazar languages." They were primitive Asiatic dialects without any alphabet or any written form. When King Bulan was converted in the 7th century he decreed that the Hebrew characters he saw in the Talmud and other Hebrew documents was thereupon to become the alphabet for the Khazar language. The Hebrew characters were adopted to the phonetics of the spoken Khazar language. The Khazars adopted the characters of the so-called Hebrew language in order to provide a means for providing a written record of their speech. The adoption of the Hebrew characters had no racial, political or religious implication.

The western European uncivilized nations which had no alphabet for their spoken language adopted the alphabet of the Latin language under comparable circumstances. With the invasion of western Europe by the Romans the civilization and the culture of the Romans was introduced into these uncivilized areas. Thus the Latin alphabet was adopted for the language of the French, Spanish, ENGLISH, Swedish and many other western European languages. These languages were completely foreign to each other yet they all used the same alphabet. The Romans brought their alphabet with their culture to these uncivilized nations exactly like the rabbis brought the Hebrew alphabet from Babylonia to the Khazars when they introduced writing to them in the form of the Talmud's alphabet.

Since the conquest of the Khazars by the Russians and the disappearance of the Khazar Kingdom the language of the Khazars is known as Yiddish. for about six centuries the so-called or self-styled "Jews" of eastern Europe have referred to themselves while still resident in their native eastern European countries as "Yiddish" by nationality. They identified themselves as "Yiddish" rather than as Russian, Polish, Galatian, Lithuanian, Rumanian, Hungarian or by the nation of which they were citizens. They also referred to the common language they all spoke as "Yiddish" also. There are today in New York City as you know, my dear Dr. Goldstein, many "Yiddish" newspapers, "Yiddish" theaters, and many other cultural organizations of so-called or self-styled "Jews" from eastern Europe which are identified publicly by the word "Yiddish" in their title.

Before it became known as the "Yiddish" language, the mother-tongue of the Khazars added many words to its limited ancient vocabulary as necessity required. These words were acquired from the languages of its neighboring nations with whom they had political, social or economic relations. Languages of all nations add to their vocabularies in the same way. The Khazars adapted words to their requirements form the German, the Slavonic and the Baltic languages. The Khazars adopted a great number of words from the German language. The Germans had a much more advanced civilization than their Khazar neighbors and the Khazars sent their children to German schools and universities. (Author’s note: My Catholic censored histories of Rome portray the Germans as a backward race of “barbarians”.)

The "Yiddish" language is not a German dialect. Many people are led to believe so because "Yiddish" has borrowed so many words from the German language. If "Yiddish" is a German dialect acquired from the Germans then what language did the Khazars speak for 1000 years they existed in eastern Europe before they acquired culture from the Germans? The Khazars must have spoken some language when they invaded eastern Europe. What was that language? When did they discard it? How did the entire Khazar population discard one language and adopt another all of a sudden? The idea is too absurd to discuss. "Yiddish" is the modern name for the ancient mother-tongue of the Khazars with added German, Slavonic and Baltic adopted and adapted numerous words.

"Yiddish" must not be confused with "Hebrew" because they both use the same characters as their alphabets. There is not one word of "Yiddish" in ancient "Hebrew" nor is there one word of ancient "Hebrew" in "Yiddish." As I stated before, they are as totally different as Swedish and Spanish which both likewise use the same Latin characters for their alphabets. The "Yiddish" language is the cultural common denominator for all the so-called or self- styled "Jews" in or from eastern Europe. To the so-called or self-styled "Jews" in and from eastern Europe, "Yiddish" serves them like the English language serves the populations of the 48 states of the United States. Their cultural common denominator throughout the 48 states is the English language, or wherever they may emigrate and resettle. The English language is the tie which binds them to each other. It is the same with the "Yiddish" language and so-called or self-styled "Jews" throughout the world.

"Yiddish" serves another very useful purpose for so-called or self-styled "Jews" throughout the world. They possess in "Yiddish" what no other national, racial or religious group can claim. Approximately 90% of the world's so-called or self-styled "Jews" living in 42 countries of the world today are either emigrants from eastern Europe, or their parents emigrated from eastern Europe. "Yiddish" is a language common to all of them as their first or second language according to where they were born. It is an "international" language to them. Regardless of what country in the world they may settle in they will always find co-religionists who also speak "Yiddish." "Yiddish" enjoys other international advantages too obvious to describe here. "Yiddish" is the modern language of a nation which has lost its existence as a nation. "Yiddish" never had a religious implication, although using Hebrew characters for its alphabet. It must not be confused with words like "Jewish." But it is very much.

Directly north of the Khazar Kingdom at the height of its power a small Slavic state was organized in 820 A.D. on the south shore of the Gulf of Finland where it flows into the Baltic Sea. This small state was organized by a small group of Varangians from the Scandinavian peninsula on the opposite shore of the Baltic Sea. The native population of this newly formed state consisted of nomad Slavs who had made their home in this area from earliest recorded history. This infant nation was even smaller than our state of Delaware. This newly-born state however was the embryo which developed into the great Russian Empire. In less than 1000 years since 820 A.D. this synthetic nation expanded its borders by ceaseless conquests until it now includes more than 9,500,000 square miles in Europe and Asia, or more than three times the area of continental United States, and they have not stopped.

During the 10th, 11th, 12th, and 13th centuries the rapidly expanding Russian nation gradually swallowed up the Khazar kingdom, its neighbor directly to the south. The conquest of the Khazar Kingdom by the Russians supplies history with the explanation for the presence after the 13th century of the large number of so-called or self-styled "Jews" in Russia. The large number of so-called or self-styled "Jews" in Russia and in eastern Europe after the destruction of the Khazar Kingdom were thereafter no longer known as Khazars but as the "Yiddish" populations of these many countries. They so refer to themselves today.

In the many wars with her neighbors in Europe after the 13th century Russia was required to cede to her victors large areas which were originally part of the Khazar Kingdom. In this manner Poland, Lithuania, Galatia, Hungary, Rumania, and Austria acquired from Russia territory originally a part of the Khazar Kingdom. Together with this territory these nations acquired a segment of the population of so-called or self-styled "Jews" descended from the Khazars who once occupied the territory. These frequent boundary changes by the nations in eastern Europe explains the presence today of so-called or self-styled "Jews" in all these countries who all trace their ancestry back to the converted Khazars. Their common language, their common culture, their common religion, and their common racial characteristics classify them all beyond any question of doubt with the Khazars who invaded eastern Europe in the 1st century B.C. and were converted to "Talmudism" in the 7th century.

The so-called or self-styled "Jews" throughout the world today of eastern European origin make up at least 90% of the world's total present population of so-called or self-styled "Jews." The conversion of King Bulan and the Khazar nation in the 7th century accomplished for "Talmudism," or for "Judaism" as "Talmudism" is called today, what the conversion of Constantine and the western European nations accomplished for Christianity. Christianity was a small comparatively unimportant religious belief practiced principally in the eastern Mediterranean area until the conversion to the Christian faith of the large populations of the western European pagan nations after the conversion of Constantine. "Talmudism," or "Judaism" as "Talmudism" is known today, was given its greatest stimulus in all its history with the conversion of the large pagan Khazar population in the 7th century. Without the conversion of the Khazar population it is doubtful if "Talmudism," or "Judaism" as "Talmudism" is known today, could have survived.

"Talmudism," the civil and religious code of the Pharisees, most likely would have passed out of existence like the many other creeds and cults practiced by the peoples in that area before, during and after "Pharisaism" assumed its prominent position among these creeds and cults in the time of Jesus. "Talmudism," as "Pharisaism" was called later, would have disappeared with all its contemporary creeds and cults but for the conversion of the Khazars to "Talmudism" in the 7th century. At that time "Talmudism" was well on its way towards complete oblivion.

In the year 986 A. D. the ruler of Russia, Vladimir III, became a convert to the Christian faith in order to marry a Catholic Slavonic princess of a neighboring sovereign state. The marriage was otherwise impossible. Vladimir III thereupon also made his newly-acquired Christian faith the state religion of Russia replacing the pagan worship formerly practiced in Russia since it was founded in 820 A.D. Vladimir III and his successors as the rulers of Russia attempted in vain to convert his so-called or self-styled "Jews," now Russian subjects, to Russia's Christian state religion and to adopt the customs and culture of the numerically predominant Russian Christian population. The so-called or self-styled "Jews" in Russia refused and resisted this plan vigorously. They refused to adopt the Russian alphabet in place of the Hebrew characters used in writing their "Yiddish" language. They resisted the substitution of the Russian language for "Yiddish" as their mother-tongue. They opposed every attempt to bring about the complete assimilation of the former sovereign Khazar nation into the Russian nation. They resisted with every means at their disposal. The many forms of tension which resulted produced situations described by history as "massacres," "pogroms," "persecution," discrimination, etc.

In Russia at that period of history it was the custom as in other Christian countries in Europe at that time to take an oath, vow or pledge of loyalty to the rulers, the nobles, the feudal landholders and others in the name of Jesus Christ. It was after the conquest of the Khazars by the Russians that the wording of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer was altered. The new altered version of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer is referred to in the Talmud as "the law of revocation in advance." The "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer was regarded as a "law." The effect of this "LAW OF REVOCATION IN ADVANCE" obtained for all who recited it each year on the eve of the Day of Atonement divine dispensation from all obligations acquired under "oaths, vows and pledges" to be made or taken in the COMING YEAR. The recital of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer on the eve of the Day of Atonement released those so-called or self-styled "Jews" from any obligation under "oaths, vows or pledges" entered into during the NEXT TWELVE MONTHS. The "oaths, vows and pledges" made or taken by so-called or self-styled "Jews" were made or taken "with tongue in cheek" for twelve months.

The altered version of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer created serious difficulties for the so-called or self-styled "Jews" when its wording became public property. It apparently did not remain a secret very long, although the Talmud states "the law of revocation in advance was not made public." The altered version of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer soon became known as the "Jews Vow" and cast serious doubt upon "oaths, vows or pledges" given to Christians by so-called or self-styled "Jews." Christians soon believed that "oaths, vows or pledges" were quite worthless when given by so-called or self-styled "Jews." This was the basis for so-called "discrimination" by governments, nobles, feudal landholders, and others who required oaths of allegiance and loyalty from those who entered their service.

An intelligent attempt was made to correct this situation by a group of German rabbis in 1844. In that year they called an international conference of rabbis in Brunswick, Germany. They attempted to have the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer completely eliminated from the Day of Atonement ceremonies, and entirely abolish from any religious service of their faith. They felt that this secular prologue to the Day of Atonement ceremonies was void of any spiritual implication and did not belong in any synagogue ritual. However the preponderant majority of the rabbis attending that conference in Brunswick came from eastern Europe. They represented congregations of Yiddish-speaking so-called or self-styled "Jews" of converted Khazar origin in eastern Europe.

They insisted that the altered version of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer be retained exactly as it was then recited on the Day of Atonement. They demanded that it be allowed to remain as it had been recited in eastern Europe since the change by Meir ben Samuel six centuries earlier. It is today recited in exactly that form throughout the world by so-called or self-styled "Jews." Will the 150,000,000 Christians in the United States react any differently when they become more aware of its insidious implications?

How genuine can the implications, inferences and innuendoes of the so-called "brotherhood" and "interfaith" movements be under these circumstances? These so-called movements are sweeping the nations like prairie fires. If the Talmud is the axis of the political, economic, cultural and social attitudes and activities of so-called or self-styled "Jews" participating in these two so-called movements, how genuine are the "oaths, vows or pledges" taken or given in connection with these two so-called movements by so-called or self-styled "Jews?" It would be a superlative gesture of "brotherhood" or of "interfaith" if the National Conference of Christians and Jews succeeded in expunging from the Talmud all anti-Christ, anti-Christian, and anti-Christianity passages. At a cost of many millions of dollars the National Conference of Christians and Jews succeeded in expunging from the New Testament passages which so-called or self-styled "Jews" regarded as offensive to their faith. A great portion of the cost was supplied by so-called or self-styled "Jews." Christians might now supply funds to expunge from the Talmud passages offensive to the Christian faith. Otherwise the so-called "brotherhood" and "interfaith" movements are merely mockeries.

The National Conference of Christians and Jews might look into the millions of dollars being invested today by so-called or self-styled "Jews" to insure that the Talmud shall remain the axis of political, economic, cultural and social attitudes and activities of so-called or self-styled "Jews" today, and future generations. Violating the basic principle of "brotherhood" and "inter-faith" so-called or self-styled "Jews" are spending millions of dollars each year to establish and equip quarters where the teachings of the Talmud can be indoctrinated into the minds of children from the time they are able to read and write.

These few news items were selected from hundreds like them which are appearing daily in newspapers clear across the nation:

"Two new Jewish Centers, built at a cost of $300,000 will be opened to 1000 students for daily and Sunday school activities next month, it was announced by the Associated Talmud Torahs." (Chicago Herald-Tribune, 8/19/50.)

"The Yeshiva School Department now provides daytime an approved English-Hebrew curriculum for grades 1 to 5 (aged 5 1/2 to 10). The afternoon Talmud Torah has opened a new beginner's class and is accepting enrollment of advanced as well as beginner students." (Jewish Voice, 9/18/53.)

"RABBI TO TALK ON TALMUD TO SHOLEM MEN. Dr. David Graubert presiding rabbi of Bet Din, and professor of rabbinical literature at the College of Jewish Studies, will present the first of his series of four lectures, "The World of the Talmud." (Chicago Tribune, 10/29/53.)

"MARYLAND GRANTS DEGREE IN TALMUD. Baltimore, (JTA). New Israel Rabbinical College has been granted here authority by the Maryland State Board of Education to issue degrees of Master of Talmudic Law and Doctor of Talmudic Law." (Jewish Voice, 1/9/53.)

"TALMUD LESSONS ON AIR FROM JERUSALEM. Weekly radio lectures on the Talmud, in English, will be available shortly on tape recordings for local stations in the United States and Canada, it was announced today." (California Jewish Voice, 1/11/52.)

Earlier in this letter, my dear Dr. Goldstein, you remember reading a quotation by the most eminent authority on the Talmud to the effect that "THE MODERN JEW IS A PRODUCT OF THE TALMUD." Would it surprise you to learn that many Christians also are the "PRODUCT OF THE TALMUD." The teachings of the Talmud are accepted by Christians in the highest echelons. I will only quote one of the subjects of the Talmud, the former President of the United States. In 1951 President Truman was presented with his second set of the "63 books" of the Talmud. On the occasion of his acceptance the newspapers carried the following news item:

"Mr. Truman thanked us for the books and said that he was glad to get them as "I have read many more of the ones presented four years ago than a lot of people think." He said that he did read a lot and that the book he read the most is the Talmud which contains much sound reasoning and good philosophy of life."

Former President Truman says he benefits by "much sound reasoning" and his brand of "good philosophy of life" which absorbs from the "book that he reads the most." His recent term in office reflected his study of the Talmud. No one familiar with the Talmud will deny that. But does our former President Truman know that Jesus did not feel the way he feels about the Talmud? The "much good reasoning" and the "good philosophy of life" in the Talmud were constantly and consistently denounced by Jesus in no uncertain terms. Former President Truman should refresh his memory by reading the New Testament passages where Jesus expresses Himself on the question of the Pharisees and their Talmud. Will Mr. Truman state that in his opinion the Talmud was the "sort of book" from which Jesus "drew the teachings which enabled him to revolutionize the world" on "moral and religious subjects?"

Before leaving the Talmud as my subject I would like to refer to the most authentic analysis of the Talmud which has ever been written. You should obtain a copy of it and read it. You will be amply rewarded for your trouble in finding a copy of it. I can doubly assure you. The name of the book is "The Talmud." It was written almost a century ago in French by Arsene Darmesteter. In 1897 it was translated into English by the celebrated Henrietta Szold and published by the Jewish Publication Society of America in Philadelphia. Henrietta Szold was an outstanding educator and Zionist and one of the most notable and admirable so-called or self-styled "Jews" of this century. Henrietta Szold's translation of Arsene Darmesteter's "The Talmud" is a classic. You will never understand the Talmud until you have read it. I will quote from it sparingly:

"Now Judaism finds its expression in the Talmud, which is not a remote suggestion and a faint echo thereof, but in which it has become incarnate, in which it has taken form, passing from a state of abstraction into the domain of real things. THE STUDY OF JUDAISM IS THAT OF THE TALMUD, AS THE STUDY OF THE TALMUD IS THAT OF JUDAISM ... THEY ARE TWO INSEPARABLE THINGS, OR BETTER, THEY ARE ONE AND THE SAME ... Accordingly, the Talmud is the completest expression of religious movement, and this code of endless prescriptions and minute ceremonials represents in its perfection the total work of the religious idea ... The miracle was accomplished by a book, the Talmud ,,, The Talmud, in turn, is composed of two distinct parts, the Mishna and the Gemara; the former the text, the latter the commentary upon the text ... By the term Mishna we designate A COLLECTION OF DECISIONS AND TRADITIONAL LAWS EMBRACING ALL DEPARTMENTS OF LEGISLATION, CIVIL AND RELIGIOUS ... This code, which was the work of several generations of Rabbis ... Nothing, indeed can EQUAL THE IMPORTANCE OF THE TALMUD unless it be the ignorance that prevails concerning it...This explains how it happens that a single page of the Talmud contains three or four different languages, or rather specimens of one language at three or four stages of degeneracy... Many a Michna of five or six lines is accompanied by fifty or sixty pages of explanation... is Law in all its authority; it constitutes dogma and cult; it is the fundamental element of the Talmud ... The DAILY STUDY OF THE TALMUD, WHICH AMONG JEWS BEGAN WITH THE AGE OF TEN TO END WITH LIFE ITSELF, necessarily was a severe gymnastic for the mind, thanks to which IT ACQUIRED INCOMPARABLE SUBTLETY AND ACUMEN -- SINCE IT ASPIRES TO ONE THING: TO ESTABLISH FOR JUDAISM A "CORPUS JURIS ECCLESIASTICI."

The above quotations were culled from a treatise intended to sugar-coat the Talmud. In painting a nice word-picture of the Talmud the author could not escape mentioning the above facts also. Coming from this source under the circumstances the facts stated above do not add glory to the Talmud.

"The Talmud Unmasked, The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concerning Christians", was written by Rev. I.B. Pranaitis, Master of Theology and Professor of the Hebrew Language at the Imperial Ecclesiastical Academy of the Roman Catholic Church in Old St. Petersburg, Russia. The Rev. Pranaitis was the greatest of the students of the Talmud. His complete command of the Hebrew language qualified him to analyze the Talmud as few men in history.

The Rev. Pranaitis scrutinized the Talmud for passages referring to Jesus, Christians and the Christian faith. These passages were translated by him into Latin. Hebrew lends itself to translation into Latin better than it does directly into English. The translation of the passages of the Talmud referring to Jesus, Christians and Christian faith were printed in Latin by the Imperial Academy of Sciences in St. Petersburg in 1893 with the Imprimatur of his Archbishop. The translation from the Latin into English was made by great Latin scholars in the United States in 1939 with funds provided by wealthy Americans for that purpose.

In order not to leave any loose ends on the subject of the Talmud's reference to Jesus, to Christians and to the Christian faith I will below summarize translations into English from the Latin texts of Rev. Pranaitis" "The Talmud Unmasked, The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concerning Christians." It would require too much space to quote these passages verbatim with their foot-notes from the Soncino Edition in English.

First I will summarize the references by Rev. Pranaitis referring to Jesus in the Talmud in the original texts translated by him into Latin, and from Latin into English:

Sanhedrin, 67a Jesus referred to as the son of Pandira, a soldier.
Kallah, 1b. (18b) Illegitimate and conceived during menstruation.
Sanhedrin, 67a Hanged on the eve of Passover.
Toldath Jeschu. Birth related in most shameful expressions.
Abhodah Zarah II Referred to as the son of Pandira, Roman soldier.
Schabbath XIV. Referred to as the son of Pandira, the Roman.
Sanhedrin, 43a On the eve of Passover they hanged Jesus.
Schabbath, 104b Called a fool and no one pays attention to fools.
Toldoth Jeschu. Judas and Jesus engaged in quarrel with filth.
Sanhedrin, 103a. Suggested corrupts his morals and dishonors self.
Sanhedrin, 107b. Seduced, corrupted and destroyed Israel.
Zohar III, (282) Died like a beast, buried in animal's dirt heap.
Hilkoth Melakhim Sought to prove Christians err worshiping Jesus.
Abhodah Zarah, 21a Reference to worship of Jesus in homes unwanted
Orach Chaiim, 113 Avoid appearance of paying respect to Jesus.
Iore Dea, 150, 2 Do not appear to pay respect to Jesus by accident
Abhodah Zarah (6a) False teachings to worship on first day of Sabbath.

The above are a few selected from a very complicated arrangement in which many references are obscured by intricate reasoning. The following are a few summarized references to Christians and the Christian faith although not always expressed in exactly that manner. There are eleven names used in the Talmud for non-Talmud followers, by which Christians are meant. Besides Nostrim, from Jesus the Nazarene, Christians are called by all the names used in the Talmud to designate all non-"Jews:" Minim, Edom, Abhodan Zarah, Akum. Obhde Elilim, Nokrim, Amme Haarets, Kuthim, Apikorosim, and Goim. Besides supplying the names by which Christians are called in the Talmud, the passages quoted below indicate what kind of people the Talmud pictures the Christians to be, and what the Talmud says about the religious worship of Christians:

Hilkhoth Maakhaloth Christians are idolaters, must not associate.
Abhodah Zarah (22a) Don't associate with gentiles, they shed blood
Iore Dea (153, 2). Must not associate with Christians, shed blood
Abhodah Zarah (25b). Beware of Christians when walking with them.
Orach Chaiim (20, 2). Christians disguise themselves to kill Jews.
Abhodah Zarah (15b) Christians have sex relations with animals.
Abhodah Zarah (22a) Suspect Christians of intercourse with animals.
Schabbath (145b) Christians unclean because they eat accordingly
Abhodah Zarah (22b) Christians unclean because not at Mount Sinai.
Iore Dea (198, 48). Clean female Jews contaminated by Christians.
Kerithuth (6b p. 78) Jews called men, Christians not called men.
Makkoth (7b) Innocent of murder if intent to kill Christian.
Orach Chaiim (225, 10) Christians and animals grouped.
Midrasch Talpioth 225 Christians created to minister to Jews.
Orach Chaiim 57, 6a Christians to be pitied more than sick pigs.
Zohar II (64b) Christian idolaters likened to cows and asses.
Kethuboth (110b). Psalmist compares Christians to unclean beasts.
Sanhedrin (74b). Tos. Sexual intercourse of Christian like beast.
Kethuboth (3b) The seed of Christian is valued as seed of beast.
Kidduschim (68a) Christians like the people of an ass.
Eben Haezar (44,8) Marriages between Christian and Jews null.
Zohar (II, 64b) Christian birth rate to be diminished materially.
Zohar (I, 28b) Christian idolaters children of Eve's serpent.
Zohar (I, 131a) Idolatrous people (Christians) befoul the world.
Emek Haschanach (17a) Non-Jews' souls come from death and its shadow.
Zohar (I, 46b, 47a) Souls of gentiles have unclean divine origins.
Rosch Haschanach (17a) Non-Jews souls go down to hell.
Iore Dea (337, 1). Replace dead Christians like lost cow or ass.
Iebhammoth (61a) Jews called men, but not Christians called men.
Abhodah Zarah (14b) T. Not to sell religious works to Christians.
Abhodah Zarah (78) Christian churches are places of idolatry.
Iore Dea (142, 10) Must keep far away physically from churches.
Iore Dea (142, 15) Do not listen to church music or look at idols.
Iore Dea (143, 1) Must not rebuild homes destroyed near churches.
Hilkoth Abh. Zar. (10b) Jews must nor resell broken chalices to Christians.
Schabbath (116a) Tos. Gospels called volumes of iniquity, heretical books.
Schabbath (116a). Talmudists agree that books of Christians to be burned.
Abhodah Zarah (2a). Festivals of Christians called days of calamity.
Abhodah Zarah (78c). Christian feast days despicable, vain and evil.
Abhodah Zarah (6a). Forbidden to observe Christian Christmas day.
Hikoth Akum (ch.IX). Forbidden to celebrate Easter and Christmas.
Chullin (91b) Jews possess dignity even angels cannot share.
Sanhedrin, 58b To strike Israelite like slapping face of God.
Chagigah, 15b A Jew considered good in spite of sins he commits.
Gittin (62a) Jew stay away from Christian homes on holidays.
Choschen Ham. (26,1) Jew not sue before a Christian judge or laws.
Choschen Ham (34,19) Christian or servant cannot become witnesses.
Iore Dea (112, 1). Eating with Christians, breeds familiarity.
Abhodah Zarah (35b) Not drink milk from cow milked by Christian.
Iore Dea (178, 1) Not imitate Christian customs, even hair-comb.
Abhodah Zarah (72b) Discard wine touched by Christians.
Iore Dea (120, 1) Bought-dishes from Christians to be well-washed.
Abhodah Zarah (2a) Avoid all, for 3 days before Christian festivals.
Abhodah Zarah (78c) Christian festivals regarded as idolatry.
Iore Dea (139, 1) Avoid things used in Christian worship.
Abhodah Zarah (14b) Don't sell Christians articles for worship.
Iore Dea (151, 1) H. Don't sell water to Christians for baptisms.
Abhodah Zarah (2a, 1) No trade with Christians on feast days.
Abhodah Zarah (1, 2) Now such trade permitted.
Abhodah Zarah (2aT) Trade because they have money to pay.
Iore Dea (148, 5) If Christian not devout, send him gifts.
Hilkoth Akum (IX, 2) Send gifts to Christians only if irreligious.
Iore Dea (81, 7 Ha) Christian wet-nurses dangerous.
Iore Dea (153, 1 H) Christian nurse will lead children to heresy.
Iore Dea (155, 1). Avoid unknown Christian doctors.
Peaschim (25a) Avoid medical help from idolaters (Christians).
Iore Dea (156, 1) Avoid Christian barbers unless escorted by Jews.
Abhodah Zarah (26a). Christian midwives dangerous when alone.
Zohar (1, 25b) Those good to Christians never rise when dead.
Hilkoth Akum (X, 6) Help needy Christians if it will promote peace.
Iore Dea (148, 12H) Hide hatred for Christians at celebrations.
Abhodah Zarah (20a) Never praise Christians lest it be believed.
Iore Dea (151, 14) Don't praise Christians to add to glory.
Hilkoth Akum (V, 12) Quote Scriptures to stop mention of their god
Iore Dea (146, 15) Christian religious articles contemptible.
Iore Dea (147, 5) Deride Christian religious articles.
Hilkoth Akum (X, 5) No gifts to Christians, gifts to converts.
Iore Dea (151, 11) No gifts to Christians, encourages friendship.
Iore Dea (335, 43) Exile for that Jew who sells farm to Christian.
Iore Dea (154, 2) Forbidden to teach a trade to a Christian.
Baba Bathra (54b) Christian property belongs to first claimant.
Choschen Ham (183, 7) Keep what Christian overpays in error.
Choschen Ham (226, 1) Jew may keep lost property of Christian.
Baba Kama (113b) It is permitted to deceive Christians.
Choschen Ham (183, 7) Jews divide what they overcharge Christians.
Choschen Ham (156, 5) Must not take Christian customers from Jews.
Iore Dea (157, 2) H May deceive all who believe Christian tenets.
Abhodah Zarah (54a) Usury practiced on Christians or apostates.
Iore Dea (159, 1) Usury permitted now for any reason to Christians.
Baba Kama (113a) Jew may lie and perjure to condemn a Christian.
Baba Kama (113b) Name of God unprofaned when lying to Christians.
Kallah (1b, p.18) Jew may perjure himself with a clear conscience.
Schabbouth Hag. (6d). Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge.
Zohar (1, 160a). Jews must always try to deceive Christians.
Iore Dea (158, 1) Do not cure Christians unless it makes enemies.
Orach Cahiim (330, 2) Not assist Christian's childbirth on Saturday
Choschen Ham.(425, 5) Unless Torah believer, don't prevent death.
Iore Dea (158, 1) Christians not enemies must not be saved either.
Hilkkoth Akum (X, 1) Do not save Christians in danger of death.
Choschen Ham (386, 10) A spy may be killed even before he confesses.
Abhodah Zarah (26b) Apostates to be cast into well, not rescued.
Choschen Ham (388,15) Kill all who give Jews' money to Christians.
Sanhedrin (59a) "Prying into Jews' "Law" to get death penalty.
Hilkhoth Akum (X, 2) Baptized Jews are to be put to death.
Iore Dea (158, 2) Hag. Kill renegades who turn to Christian rituals.
Choschen Ham (425, 5) Those who do not believe in Torah to be killed
Hilkhoth tesch.III, 8 Christians deny the "Law" of the Torah.
Zohar (I, 25a) Christians to be destroyed as idolaters.
Zohar (II, 19a) Captivity of Jews end when Christian princes die.
Zohar (I, 219b) Princes of Christians are idolaters, must die.
Obadiam When Rome is destroyed, Israel will be redeemed.
Abhodah Zarah (26b) T. Even the best of the Goim should be killed.
Sepher Or Israel 177b If Jew kills Christian commits no sin.
Ialkut Simoni (245c) Shedding blood of impious sacrifice to God.
Zohar (II,43a). Extermination of Christian necessary sacrifice.
Zohar (L, 28b, 39a) High place in heaven for all who kill idolaters.
Hilkhoth Akum (X, 1) Make no agreement, show no mercy to Christians
Hilkhoth Akum (X, 1) Turn them away from their idols or kill.
Hilkhoth Akum (X, 7). Allow no idolators to remain where Jews are strong.
Choschen Ham (388,16) All contribute to cost of killing traitor.
Pesachim (49b) No need of prayers while beheading on Sabbath.
Schabbath (118a). Prayers save from punishment of coming Messiah.

In the Library of Congress and the New York Public Library, unless recently removed, you can find a copy of "The Talmud Unmasked, The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concerning Christians" by the Rev. I. B. Pranaitis. A copy of the original work printed in St. Petersburg, Russia in 1892 can be made available to you by our mutual friend if you are interested in reading the above passages in the original Hebrew text with their Latin translation. I trust my summaries correctly explain the original text. I believe they do. If I am in error in any way please be so kind as to let me know. It was very difficult to reduce them to short summaries.

The National Conference of Christians and Jews need not scrutinize the "63 books" of the Talmud to discover all the anti-Christ, anti-Christian, and anti-Christian faith passages in the books which are "THE LEGAL CODE WHICH FORMS THE BASIS OF JEWISH RELIGIOUS LAW" and which is "THE TEXTBOOK USED IN THE TRAINING OF RABBIS." They can also keep that, as Rabbi Morris Kertzer also points out, as explained earlier, that "ADULTS STUDY ANCIENT WRITINGS TOO ... IN ... GROUP DISCUSSION OF TALMUD BEFORE EVENING PRAYER." If the National Conference of Christians and Jews are genuinely interested in "interfaith" and "brotherhood" do you not think, my dear Dr. Goldstein, that they should compel a start at once to expunge from the Talmud the anti-Christ, anti-Christian, and anti-Christianity passages from the Talmud in the "brotherly" way they expunged passages from the New Testament? Will you ask them?

Throughout the world the Oxford English Dictionary is accepted as the most authoritative and authentic source for information on the origin, definition and use of words in the English language. Authorities in all fields everywhere accept the Oxford English Dictionary brings out clearly that "Judaist" and "Judaic" are the correct forms for the improper and incorrect misused and misleading "Jews" and "Jewish." You will agree completely with the Oxford English Dictionary if you consider the matter carefully. "Judaist" and "Judaic" are correct. "Jews" and "Jewish" are incorrect. "Jew" and "Jewish" do not belong in the English language if the use of the correct words is of interest to the English-speaking peoples.

The so-called or self-styled "Jews" cannot truthfully describe themselves as "Jews" because they are not in any sense "Judeans." They can correctly identify themselves by their religious belief if they so wish by identifying themselves as "Judaists." A "Judaist" is a person who professes so-called "Judaism" as his religious belief, according to the Oxford English Dictionary. The origin of "Jew" has not its roots in "Judaism" as explained. The adjective form of "Judaist" is "Judaic." "Jewish" as an adjective is just as incorrect as "Jew" is as a noun. "Jewish" has no reason to exist.

Well-planned and well-financed publicity by so-called or self-styled "Jews" in English-speaking countries in the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries created a wide acceptance and use for "Jewish." "Jewish" is being used today in many ways that are no less fantastic and grotesque than incorrect and inaccurate. "Jewish" is used today to describe everything from "Jewish blood," whatever that may be, to "Jewish Rye Bread," strange as that may sound. The many implications, inferences and innuendoes of "Jewish" today resulting from its commercial uses beggar description.

At the 1954 annual meeting of the St. Paul Guild in the Plaza Hotel in New York City before more than 1000 Catholics, a Roman Catholic priest who was the main speaker and the guest of honor referred to "my Jewish blood." It just happens that this priest was born a so-called or self-styled "Jews" in eastern Europe and was converted to Catholicism there about 25 years ago. It seems unique that a priest who has professed Catholicism that length of time should mention "my Jewish blood" to Catholics. The radio blasts and the out-door signs blazon "Levy's Jewish Rye Bread," in the same city at the same time. Between these two extremes are countless other products and other services which advertise themselves in print, on radio and television, as "Jewish."KC

This priest who talks to Catholics about "my Jewish blood" when he addresses audiences also refers to the "Jewish blood" of Mary, Holy Mother of Jesus, to the "Jewish blood" of the Apostles, and to the "Jewish blood" of the early Christians. What he means by "my Jewish blood" mystifies those Catholics who hear him. They query "What is "Jewish blood""? They ask what happens to "Jewish blood" when so-called or self-styled "Jews" are converted to Catholicism? And in the extreme case when a so-called or self-styled "Jew" becomes a Roman Catholic priest? How is "Jewish blood" biologically different from the blood of persons who profess other religious faiths, they ask. It is hard for me to believe that there is anything biologically different which determines characteristics typical of a specific religious belief. Are the inherent racial and national characteristics determined by religious dogma or doctrine?KC

The word "Jewess" raises a similar question. If "Jewess" is the female for the male "Jew" I must admit that I have been unable to find female as well as male designation for persons professing any religious belief other than so-called "Judaism." Are there any other that you know? I have searched for the female of Catholicism, Protestantism, Hindu, Moslem, and others but without success. It seems very popular now to refer to Mary, Holy Mother of Jesus, as a "Jewess." It does seem unrealistic to identify the sex of members of any religious belief by appropriate designations. If the word "Jew" is regarded as descriptive of a race or a nation, as is often the case, it is equally unrealistic to indicate the sex of members of a race or a nation by a suffix used for that purpose. I know of no case in that respect except "Negress," and the Negro race strongly objects to the use of that designation, and strongly.

Another word is creating more problems among Christians. I refer to "Judeo-Christian." You see it more and more day by day. Based on our present knowledge of history, and on good sense applied to theology, the term "Judea-Christian" presents a strange combination. Does "Judeo" refer to ancient "Pharisaism," or to "Talmudism," or to so-called "Judaism?" In view of what we know today, how can there be "Judeo-Christian" anything? Based upon what is now known "Judeo-Christian" is as unrealistic as it would be to say anything is "hot-cold," or "old-young," or "heavy-light," or that a person was "healthy-sick," or "poor-rich," or "dumb-smart," or "ignorant-educated," or "happy-sad." These words are antonyms, not synonyms. "Judeo-Christian" in the light of incontestable facts are also antonyms, not synonyms as so-called or self-styled "Jews" would like Christians to believe. More sand for Christian's eyes.

An "Institute of Judeo-Christian Studies" has been established by Seton Hall University. It is actually a "one-man Institute." Father John M. Oesterreicher is the "one-man Institute." The "Institute of Judaeo-Christian Studies" occupies a small office in a down-town office building in Newark, N. J. This "one-man Institute," according to their literature, has no faculty except Father Oesterreicher, and no students. Father Oesterreicher was born a so-called or self-styled "Jew" and became a convert to Catholicism. I have had the pleasure of hearing him talk on many occasions. Addresses by Father Oesterreicher and literature by mail are the principal activities of the "Institute of Judaeo-Christian Studies." Father Oesterreicher also plans to publish books and circulate them throughout the world, in large quantities.

Father Oesterreicher leaves no stones unturned to convince Catholics that "Judaeo-Christian" is a combination of two words that are synonyms theologically. Nothing could be further from the truth. Father Oesterreicher impresses that viewpoint upon his Catholic audiences. Father Oesterreicher talks to Catholic audiences only, so far as I am able to tell. In his addresses Father Oesterreicher impresses upon Catholics the opinion he personally holds on the question of the dependence of the Christian faith upon so-called "Judaism." His audiences depart Father Osterreicher's addresses very much confused.

It would make better Catholics out of Father Oesterreicher's audiences if he would "sell" Jesus and the Catholic Church rather than try to "sell" so-called "Judaism" to his audiences. Well-planned and well-financed publicity by so-called or self-styled "Jews" manages to keep Christians well informed on the subject of so-called "Judaism." If Father Oesterreicher would concentrate upon "selling" Jesus and the Christian faith to audiences of so-called or self-styled "Jews" he would be doing more towards realizing the objectives of Christian effort. The activities of this "one-man Institute" are somewhat of a deep mystery. But I am certain that Monsignor McNulty will never allow the "Institute of Judaeo-Christian Studies" to bring discredit upon the fine record of Seton Hall as one of the foremost Catholic universities anywhere. But it will bear watching, and Monsignor McNulty will always appreciate constructive comment.

The word "anti-Semitism" is another word which should be eliminated from the English language. "Anti-Semitism" serves only one purpose today. It is used as a "smear word." When so-called or self-styled "Jews" feel that anyone opposes any of their objectives they discredit their victims by applying the word "anti-Semite" or "anti-Semitic" through all the channels they have at their command and under their control. I can speak with great authority on that subject. Because so-called or self-styled "Jews" were unable to disprove my public statements in 1946 with regard to the situation in Palestine, they spent millions of dollars to "smear" me as an "anti-Semite" hoping thereby to discredit me in the eyes of the public who were very much interested in what I had to say. Until 1946 I was a "little saint" to all so-called or self-styled "Jews." When I disagreed with them publicly on the Zionist intentions in Palestine I became suddenly "Anti-Semite No. 1."

It is disgraceful to watch the Christian clergy take up the use of the word "anti-Semitism." They should know better. They know that "anti-Semitism" is a meaningless word in the sense it is used today. They know the correct word is "Judaeophobe." "Anti-Semite" was developed into the "smear-word" it is today because "Semite" is associated with Jesus in the minds of Christians. Christians are accessories in the destruction of the Christian faith by tolerating the use of the smear-word "anti-Semitic" to silence by the most intolerant forms of persecution employing that smear word Christians who oppose the evil conspirators.

It no doubt grieves you as much as it grieves me, my dear Dr. Goldstein, to see our nation's moral standards sink to new all time lows day by day. Of that there is very little doubt. The moral standards of this nation in political, economic, social and spiritual fields are the factors which determine the position we will occupy in world affairs. We will be judged on that basis from afar by the other 94% of the world's total population. Our 6% of the world's total population will succeed or fail in its efforts to retain world leadership by our moral standards because in the last analysis they influence the attitudes and activities of the nation. The moral standards are the crucible in which the nation's character is refined and molded. The end product will never be any better than the ingredients used. It is something to think about.

There is much for which this Christian country can still feel very proud. But there is also much for which we cannot feel proud. A correct diagnosis of our nation's rapidly deteriorating moral standards in all walks of life will reveal the cause as the nation's current psychosis to concentrate primarily on how to (1) "make MORE money" and (2) "have MORE fun." How many persons do you personally know who include among their daily duties service and sacrifice in the defense against its enemies of that priceless birthright which is the God-given heritage of all those blessed to be born Americans? What services? What sacrifices?

With very few exceptions this generation seems to regard everything as secondary to our accountability to unborn generations for our generation's breach of the faith and betrayal of our trust to posterity. The sabotage of our nation's moral standards is more incidental to the program of that inimical conspiracy than accidental in the continued march of mankind towards an easier existence. The guidance and control of this nation's place in history has gravitated by default into the hands of those persons lease worthy of that trusteeship. This notable achievement by them is their reward for their success in obtaining effective and numerous Christian "male prostitutes" to "front" for them. Too many of these efficacious Christian "male prostitutes" are scattered throughout the nation in public affairs for the security of the Christian faith and the nation's political, social and economic stability.

A "male prostitute" is a male who offers the faculties of his anatomy from the neck up for hire to anyone who will pay his "asking price" exactly as the female of the same species offers the facilities of her anatomy from the neck down to anyone who will pay her "asking price." Thousands of these pseudo-Christian "male-prostitutes" circulate freely unrecognized in all walks of life proudly pandering pernicious propaganda for pecuniary profit and political power. They are the "dog in the manger." The corroding effect of their subtle intrigue is slowly but surely disintegrating the moral fiber of the nation. This danger to the Christian faith cannot be overestimated. This peril to the nation should not be under-estimated. The Christian clergy must remain alerted to it.

The international "crime of crimes" of all history, that reprehensible iniquity in which this nation played the major role, was committed in Palestine almost totally as a result of the interference of the United States in that situation on behalf solely of the Zionist world-wide organization with its headquarters in New York City. The interference of the United States in that situation on behalf of the aggressors illustrates the power exerted upon the domestic and foreign policies of this government by the "male prostitutes" fearlessly functioning on behalf of the Zionist conspirators. It is the blackest page in our history.

The responsibility for that un-Christian, non-Christian and anti-Christian "cause" can be honestly deposited on the door-step of the Christian clergy. They must assume the full guilt for that inhumane and unholy crime committed in the name of Christian "charity." Sunday after Sunday, year in and year out, the Christian clergy dinned into the ears of 150,000,000 Christians who go to church regularly that Christians must regard it as their "Christian duty" to support the Zionist conspiracy for the conquest of Palestine. Well, we "sowed a wind," now we will "reap a whirlwind."

The 150,000,000 Christians in the United States were "high pressured" by the Christian clergy to give their unqualified support to the Zionist program to "repatriate" to their "homeland" in Palestine the so-called or self-styled "Jews" in eastern Europe who were the descendants of the Khazars. Christians were exhorted by the Christian clergy to regard the so-called or self-styled "Jews" in eastern Europe as God's "chosen people" and Palestine as their "Promised Land." But they knew better all the time. It was a case of cupidity not stupidity you can be sure.

As a direct result of the activities of the "male prostitutes" on behalf of the Zionist program, and contrary to all international law, to justice and to equity, anything to the contrary notwithstanding, the 150,000,000 Christians in the United States, with few exceptions, demanded that the Congress of the United States use the prestige and the power of this nation, diplomatic, economic and military, to guarantee the successful outcome of the Zionist program for the conquest of Palestine. This was done and the Zionists conquered Palestine. We are responsible.

It is a well-established and an undeniable historic fact that the active participation of the United States in the conquest of Palestine, on behalf of the Zionists, was the factor responsible for the conquest of Palestine by the Zionists. Without the active participation of the United States on behalf of the Zionists it is certain that the Zionists would never have attempted the conquest of Palestine by force of arms. Palestine today would be an independent sovereign country under a form of government established by self-determination of the lawful and legal Palestinians. This was aborted by the payment of countless millions of dollars to Christian "male prostitutes" by Zionists on a scale difficult for the uninitiated to even imagine.

With your kind permission anticipated, I beg to respectfully and sincerely now submit to you here my comments on several passages in your latest article which appeared in the September issue of the A.P.J. Bulletin under the headline "News and Views of Jews." Deep down in my heart, my dear Dr. Goldstein, I truly feel that I can make a modest contribution towards the big success I wish you in the valuable work you are attempting, under such discouraging handicaps. My reactions to what you state in your article may prove helpful to you. My comments here were conceived in that spirit. May I suggest that you favor them with your consideration accordingly. I feel that you may be so close to the "trees" that you cannot see the "forest" in its true perspective. You may find a genuinely sincere outsider's point of view helpful to you in orienting your yesterday's attitudes to today's realities and to tomorrow's seemingly certain probabilities. I believe you will.

You realize, my dear Dr. Goldstein, that all "Laws of Nature" are irrevocable. "Laws of Nature" can neither be amended, suspended or repealed regardless how we feel about them. One of these "Laws of Nature" is fundamentally the basic reason "WHY JEWS BECOME CATHOLICS," the subtitle in your article which attracted my attention. The "Law of Nature" to which I refer is the law that "TO EVERY ACTION THERE IS AN EQUAL AND OPPOSITE REACTIONS." In my respectful opinion that "Law of Nature is the alpha and omega of all questions as to "WHY JEWS BECOME CATHOLICS."

In your article you make this mystery sound very complicated. However, it really is very simple. The so-called or self-styled "Jews" who become Catholics today are subconsciously reacting to that "Law of Nature." The conversion to Catholicism of the so-called or self-styled "Jews" is the "EQUAL AND OPPOSITE REACTION" of that "Law of Nature." Their conversion is a "REACTION" not an "ACTION." Can you any longer doubt that after reading these facts?

Catholicism has proven itself spiritually the "EQUAL AND OPPOSITE REACTION" of the religious worship practiced today under the name "Judaism," and prior to that name under the names "Talmudism" and "Pharisaism." What is spiritually conspicuous in Catholicism is conspicuous by its absence in so-called "Judaism." What is spiritually conspicuous in so-called "Judaism" is conspicuous by its absence in Catholicism, thank God. Anything which may be said by anyone to the contrary notwithstanding, Catholicism and so-called "Judaism" are at the opposite extremes of the spiritual spectrum.

Our subconscious mind never sleeps. It remains awake all the while the conscious mind is asleep. This subconscious mind of so-called or self-styled "Jews" is "WHY JEWS BECOME CATHOLICS." The more spiritually sensitive subconscious minds of the so-called or self-styled "Jews" for 2000 years has been seeking a spiritually secure beach-head as a refuge from the terror of the Talmud. After a lifetime breathing the atmosphere of the Talmud so-called or self-styled "Jews" found Catholicism a wholesome and refreshing change of spiritual climate. They could not resist the spiritual force of the "EQUAL AND OPPOSITE REACTION" WHICH ATTRACTED THEM TO CATHOLICISM.

Catholicism supplied a sacred sanctuary for the more spiritually sensitive subconscious mind of the so-called or self-styled "Jew" seeking security in his escape from the Talmud. Before sailing into the safe port of Catholicism the subconscious mind of the more spiritually sensitive so-called or self-styled "Jews" would embark upon that voyage of their more courageous co-religionists but for one reason. They fear reprisals by their co-religionists.

In your article you mention just a few of the many penalties imposed by reactionary so-called or self-styled "Jews" upon their co-religionists who become converts to Catholicism. Conversion to Catholicism has even deprived many former so-called or self-styled "Jews" from earning their living. Many families faced starvation for that reason. A convert to Catholicism must be ready and willing to suffer the economic, social and political hardships his former co-religionists will make him pay as the price for the spiritual wealth he will acquire with conversion to Catholicism.

Investigation by you will convince you that so-called or self-styled "Jews" never turn spiritually to Catholicism "BECAUSE SUCH WAS THE JEWISH RELIGION: BECAUSE SUCH IS THE CATHOLIC RELIGION," as you state in your article. A so-called or self-styled "Jew" might question the wisdom of conversion from the original to a copy of the original. Inasmuch as so-called "Judaism" is a modern name for "Talmudism," and "Talmudism" is a name given to the ancient practice of "Pharisaism," how can you reconcile what you state that "... SUCH WAS THE JEWISH RELIGION: ... SUCH IS THE CATHOLIC RELIGION."

Several so-called or self-styled "Jews" who were recently converted to Catholicism are my personal friends. Not one of those whom I have asked became a Catholic because they felt "THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS THE JEWISH CHURCH GLORIFIED," as you state in your article. What "JEWISH CHURCH" they ask me? I am unable to answer. What "JEWISH CHURCH" I ask you? "Pharisaism?" "Talmudism?" Surely you would not venture the opinion that the Catholic Church is "Pharisaism" or "Talmudism" now "GLORIFIED" as Catholicism, would you?

It must be quite apparent to you now that so-called or self- styled "Jews" who became converts to Catholicism do not believe that the Catholic Church, as you state in your article, "IS THE CHURCH OF JEWISH CONVERTS AND THEIR DESCENDANTS." They do not regard Jesus as a "CONVERT" to the Catholic Church. You include Jesus as a "CONVERT" to the Catholic Church, in your article. In your article you state, "FIRST CAME CHRIST, THE JEW OF JEWS." I never heard that designation before. Is it original? Nor will converted so-called or self-styled "Jews" concur at all with "THEN CAME THE APOSTLES, ALL JEWS," as you also state in your article. There is unquestionably too big an area of disagreement here to disregard the views of those who have become converts to Catholicism. Nor can these converts to Catholicism be made to believe as truth "THEN CAME THE THOUSANDS OF THE FIRST MEMBERS OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, WHO WERE JEWS," as you state in your article under discussion here.

My dear Dr. Goldstein, as a former so-called or self-styled "Jew" for almost half your life, when you became a convert to Catholicism did you do so for the reasons you state in your article "WHY JEWS BECOME CATHOLICS?" That would be difficult for me to believe in spite of the further statements you make in your article "IN FACT THERE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN A CATHOLIC CHURCH WERE IT NOT FOR THE JEWS." That statement appears incredible in view of incontestable facts, but these facts may not have been available to you when you made it.

If so-called or self-styled "Jews" believed what you state in your article they would undoubtedly prefer to stay put spiritually in their "JEWISH CHURCH," by which you mean, no doubt, so-called "Judaism." They would query why Catholics expected them to leave their "JEWISH CHURCH" to enter the Catholic Church. It might appear more logical to expect Catholics to return to the original of the Catholic Church, the "JEWISH CHURCH," or so-called "Judaism." On the basis of what you state, that would not be inconsistent.

You take away my breath when you further state "CATHOLICISM WOULD NOT EXIST WERE IT NOT FOR JUDAISM." That leaves very little for me to say after writing these 62 pages of facts and comments. In a certain sense there is certain sense to what you state if you feel that the existence of so-called "Judaism," in the time of Jesus and since then, created the necessity for the existence of Catholicism. But in no sense can the Catholic Church be adjudicated the projection of "Pharisaism," "Talmudism," or so-called "Judaism."

We should get together in person to go into this matter more fully. I hope you will extend that privilege to me in the not too distant future. In closing this letter I sincerely request that you bear in mind while reading this letter Galatians, 4:16, "Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?" And to this I add, "I hope not." I hope that we shall continue to be the very best of friends. If the Christian faith is to be rescued from its dedicated enemies we must all join hands and form a "human lifeline." We must pull together, not in different directions. We must "bury the hatchet" but not in each other's heads.

Looking forward with pleasant anticipation to the delight of meeting with you in person whenever you find it convenient and agreeable for yourself, and awaiting your early reply for which I take this opportunity to thank you in advance, and with best wishes for your continued good health and success, please believe me to be,

Most respectfully and very sincerely,
Benjamin H. Freedman facts2.htm

"Whose Bread I Eat, His Song I Must Sing."

Author’s note: The views and opinions expressed in the foregoing chapter do not in any way reflect those of the author of this communique. It is in-cluded because of the many facts it brings to the table --- and not the views and/or opinions as to the relative merits of Catholicism contrasted with Judaism.

Chapter 6

JEW/ARAB CONFLICT

Have you ever wondered about the Jew/Arab enmity and why they are such bitter enemies? When we look at history, we find them fighting as far back as we have written accounts. Don't both factions trace their ancestry back to Abraham?

Is the battle simply over real estate or does it go deeper than that? The Jews believe they have a written deed, to the property where Israel is located, granted by the God of Moses in the Torah. They secretly believe that it extends far beyond the present day borders of Israel, but do they really have this "deed" and did God grant this to the Jews of our day --- or those “…who say they are Jews but do lie”?

Let's look at what the Jews base their claims on. In Genesis 13:14, it says, "And the Lord said unto Abram (later changed to Abraham), after that Lot was separated from him, 'Lift up now your eyes, and look from the place where you are northward, and southward, and eastward, and westward:
15 "'for all the land which you see, to you will I give it, and to your seed for ever.

Now to verse 17, "Arise, walk through the land in the length of it and in the breadth of it; for I will give it unto you."

Here we see the beginning of the promises made to Abraham, but only the beginning.

In chapter 17, starting in verse 4, God is talking to Abram, and says, "As for me, behold, my covenant (binding agreement) is with you, and you shall be a father of many nations.
5 "Neither shall your name any more be called Abram, but your name shall be Abraham for a father of many nations have I made you."

At this time the only child Abraham had was Ishmael and he was born of Sarah's handmaid, Hagar, and is acknowledged (by the Arabs) as the father of the Arabs.

Dropping down to verse 19, it says, "And God said, 'Sarah, thy wife shall bear thee a son indeed; and thou shall call his name Isaac: and I will establish my covenant with him for an everlasting covenant and with his seed after him.'"

So was Ishmael forgotten by God? No. Verse 20 says, "And as for Ishmael, I have heard thee: Behold, I have blessed him, and will make him fruitful, and will multiply him exceedingly; twelve princes shall he beget, and I will make of him a great nation."

But in verse 21, God repeats himself and says, "But my covenant will I establish with Isaac…"

And Isaac isn't even born.

Let's move forward a few years now and see if we can understand what goes on in the Arab as well as the Israeli mind. In the 22nd chapter of Genesis, we see where Abraham was tested by God. Verse 1 says, "And it came to pass after these things, that God did tempt (test) Abraham, and said unto him, 'Abraham', and he said, 'Behold, here I am'.
2 "And he said, 'Take now your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and get you into the land of Moriah; and offer him there for a burnt offering upon one of the mountains which I will tell you of.'

Wow! So God himself is the author of human sacrifices, huh? Not really. This is a test and if you continue, you see that God did not require Abraham to go through with the sacrifice of his only son (by Sarah, his wife), but as it said in verse 1, it was a test of obedience on the part of Abraham who was to become the "father of the faithful."

It's interesting to note that the Arabs (this was related to me by a lady who had worked with Arab children) teach that this test was conducted with Ishmael, rather than Isaac. Consider the evidence and then you decide.

Verse 10 says, "And Abraham stretched forth his hand, and took the knife to slay his son.
11 "And the angel of the Lord called unto him out of heaven, and said, 'Abraham, Abraham:' and he said, 'Here am I.'
12 "And he said, 'Lay not your hand upon the lad, neither do you any thing unto him: for now I know that you fear God, seeing you have not withheld your son, your only (by his wife) son from me.'"

What was the reward of this act of faith by Abraham?

15 "And the angel of the Lord called unto Abraham out of heaven the second time,
16 "And said, 'By myself have I sworn', saith the Lord, 'for because you have done this thing, and have not withheld your son, your only son:
17 "'That in blessing I will bless you, and in multiplying I will multiply your seed as the stars of the heaven, and as the sand which is upon the sea shore; and your seed shall possess the gate of his enemies; (Gibralter? Khyber Pass? Panama Canal?)
18 "'And in your seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; because you have obeyed my voice.'"

So now we see that Abraham had a promise of material wealth. So was the covenant confirmed in Isaac after Abraham's death? Let's see. Starting in verse 1 of chapter 26, we read, "And there was a famine in the land, beside the first famine that was in the days of Abraham. And Isaac went unto Abimelech, king of the Philistines unto Gerar.
2 "And the Lord appeared unto him, and said, 'Go not down into Egypt; dwell in the land which I shall tell you of:
3 "Sojourn (travel/live/stay) in this land, and I will be with you, and will bless you; for unto you, and unto your seed, I will give all these countries, and I will perform the oath which I swore unto Abraham your father;
4 "And I will make your seed to multiply as the stars of heaven, and will give unto your seed all these countries; and in your seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed;
5 "Because that Abraham obeyed my voice, and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws."

If this begins to get boring, bear with me, for if you don't understand why the Jews and Arabs are such bitter enemies, I think you will find the understanding gained here will be exhilarating. But more than that, it will clear up so many other mysteries of life.

So now we have the covenant confirmed with Isaac, the son of Abraham. Isaac and Rebecca had two sons, Esau and Jacob. The Lord spoke to Rebecca before the twin boys were born and said, (Genesis 25:23) "…Two nations are in your womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from your bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger."

The first one born (the elder) was Esau, and following the story in verse 29, we find, "And Jacob sod pottage: (or cooked a pot of soup) and Esau came from the field, and he was faint: (Faint he was, he had just fought a war and killed Nimrod per the book of Jasher.)
30 "And Esau said to Jacob, 'Feed me, I pray you, with that same red pottage; for I am faint: therefore was his name called Edom (red).
31 "And Jacob said, 'Sell me this day your birthright.'"

By this time it had been established among the offspring of Abraham that the "birthright" (material wealth/gold/real estate/etc) would be handed down to the oldest son who was to become the patriarch of the family upon the death of the father. Now the birthright was not a negotiable item. It was passed on by the patriarch before his death, however, we see the stage set here for the younger of the twins to inherit the birthright, or the wealth accumulated during the lifetime of Isaac and Rebecca, because Esau said, verse 32, "Behold, I am at the point to die: and what profit shall this birthright do to me?"
33 "And Jacob said, 'Swear to me this day;' and he swore unto him: and he sold his birthright unto Jacob."

Now came some complicity. Jacob had coerced Esau into "selling" his birthright but his father Isaac had not agreed to this and since Isaac was the one who would be conferring this, it presented a problem for Jacob. Jacob, however, was not easily dissuaded and with the help of his mother Rebecca, they pulled off the deception in a manner that would be the envy of modern day politicians. We can pick up the story in chapter 27. Verse 1 says, "And it came to pass, that when Isaac was old, and his eyes were dim, so that he could not see, he called Esau, his eldest son, and said unto him, 'My son:' and he said unto him, 'Behold, here am I.'
2 "And he said, 'Behold now, I am old, I know not the day of my death:
3 "'Now therefore take, I pray you, your weapons, your quiver and your bow, and go out to the field, and take me some venison;
4 "'And make me savoury meat, such as I love, and bring it to me, that I may eat; that my soul may bless you before I die.'
5 "And Rebecca heard when Isaac spoke to Esau his son. And Esau went to the field to hunt for venison, and to bring it.
6 "And Rebecca spoke unto Jacob, her son, saying, 'Behold, I heard your father speak unto Esau your brother, saying,
7 "'Bring me venison, and make me savoury meat, that I may eat, and bless you before the Lord before my death.'
8 "Now therefore, my son, obey my voice according to that which I command you.
9 "Go now to the flock, and fetch me from thence two good kids of the goats; and I will make them savoury meat for your father, such as he loves:
10 "And you shall bring it to your father, that he may eat, and that he may bless you before his death.
11 "And Jacob said to Rebecca, his mother, 'Behold, Esau, my brother, is a hairy man, and I am a smooth man:
12 "My father peradventure will feel me, and I shall seem to him as a deceiver; and I shall bring a curse upon me, and not a blessing.
13 "And his mother said unto him, 'Upon me be thy curse, my son: only obey my voice, and go fetch me them.'"

If you read the rest of the chapter, you will find the ruse worked, Isaac was tricked and the birthright was officially passed on to Jacob as God had determined before the boys were born.

Now Isaac discovered, of course, that he had been fooled and wasn't all that happy about it, nevertheless, he honored what he had conferred upon Jacob and reconfirmed it at a later date. The occasion is of sending Jacob to Padanaram to find a wife of his own tribes, because Esau had taken wives of the Canaanites and this was a constant vexation to Isaac and Rebecca.

Chapter 28:1 "And Isaac called Jacob, and blessed him, and charged him, and said unto him, 'You shall not take a wife of the daughters of Canaan.
2 "Arise, go to Padanaram, to the house of Bethuel your mother's father; and take you a wife from there of the daughters of Laban your mother's brother.
3 "And God Almighty bless you, and make you fruitful, and multiply you, that thou may be a multitude of people;
4 "And give you the blessing of Abraham, to you, and to your seed with you; that you may inherit the land wherein thou are a stranger, which God gave unto Abraham.”

So we have seen that the covenant was to be established through Isaac rather than Ishmael. We have seen that the material wealth, including real estate, was passed down from Isaac to Jacob, whose name was later changed by God to Israel (Genesis 32:28). Does this then give the nation named Israel today a deed to all that territory promised to Abraham and Isaac? Let's carry this out to a logical conclusion and refrain from making hasty judgments. There may be some surprises in store, even for Sephardic Jews.

Jacob, whose name was changed to Israel had 12 sons and one daughter by two wives and their two handmaids. His own private harem. But it wasn't all a bed of roses. His favorite son was Joseph and probably because he was his father's favorite, he was hated by his brothers. They were going to kill him, but Reuben, the oldest, had enough presence of mind to quash that plan so Judah (ancestor of Jews) came up with a plan "B" (Not to be confused with line "B"). Why not get rid of the pest and make some money on the deal too? So they sold him as a slave to a band of Midianites who were on their way to Egypt.

It seems as if God himself sticks up for underdogs and looked after Joseph in Egypt even though Joseph had to make some hard choices and landed in prison because of one of those choices. Apparently, he spent several years in the pokey but the guards kinda liked him and so his life was tolerable. In time, the Pharaoh's attention was drawn to Joseph and through interpreting a dream for the Pharaoh, he became the second highest ruler in all Egypt. The dream interpretation had to do with a seven year famine that hit, not only Egypt, but Palestine as well. So Joseph was put in charge of the distribution of food in Egypt, and to those who came from other lands, during the famine. Imagine the chagrin of his brothers who came to Egypt to buy grain and found the one they sold as a slave in charge. Egg all over their faces… you can read the story starting in Genesis 39 through chapter 45.

The upshot of the story was that Jacob (Israel) and all his family, who now numbered about 70, moved to Egypt where there was food. Since they were farmers/ranchers, they were given some choice delta farmland and settled in to grow into a nation. One can only surmise that they enjoyed life immensely because they began to expand as a people so fast that it alarmed the Egyptians. So, after the death of Joseph, the rulers of Egypt began to plan ways to deal with this growing force among them. They made slaves of the Israelites and tried to work them to death but they just continued to grow in population so that at the time of their miraculous delivery from the slavery of Egypt, they numbered somewhere in the range of 3,000,000 people.

Israel died in Egypt and Joseph took his body back to Palestine for burial. But before he died, he passed on the birthright. Not only the birthright, but he laid out the futures of his sons and told them "…that which befall you in the latter days." Genesis 49:1.
3 "Reuben, you are my firstborn, my might, and the beginning of my strength, the excellency of dignity, and the excellency of power:
4 "Unstable as water, you shall not excel; because you went up to your father's bed; then defiled you it: he went up to my couch. (Gen 35:22)

Because Reuben went in and lay with his father's concubine, he did not inherit the birthright. But then, neither did Judah. If we drop back to chapter 48, verse 1, we can see the transfer of the birthright. "And it came to pass after these things, that one told Joseph, 'Behold, your father is sick: and he took with him his two sons, Manasseh and Ephraim.
2 "And one told Jacob, and said, 'Behold, your son Joseph comes unto you: and Israel strengthened himself, and sat upon the bed.

If we read the account, we find that Israel adopted Joseph's two sons at that time and also said, "Let my name be named on them." He also passed on the birthright (material wealth/real estate) to them through Joseph at that time. We find this stated again many years later in I Chronicles 5:1. "Now the sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel, (for he was the firstborn; but, forasmuch as he defiled his father's bed, his birthright was given unto the sons of Joseph, the son of Israel: and the genealogy is not to be reckoned after the birthright.

2 "For Judah prevailed above his brethren, and of him came the chief ruler; but the birthright was Joseph's:")

Imagine that! "Judah prevailed above (rulership) his brethren…" but no real estate. Will this push Jewish "hot buttons"?

So am I saying that the Jews today in the little nation of Israel are just squatters with no scriptural authority and should be pushed out by the PLO and Arabs? I'm sure the latter would like to hear a resounding "Yes" answer to that question, however, we should look a little further if we are trying to find the answer in the Word of God.

First, we need to understand that the nation of Israel today is not the Israel of the Bible. Again, the books of Kings make this quite plain and the Jews know this. But they will swing either way and pick the one which seems the most advantageous at the time. The nation of Israel today was probably so named in order to keep up the deception and promote the illusion of a gulf between Judaism and Christianity(Catholicism). Israel went into captivity about 720 BC and you can find the story in II Kings 17. Judah continued a pretext of God's government until the first wave was taken captive by Nebuchadnezzar about 604 BC. The temple was burned and Jerusalem sacked in or near 586 BC.

Nor is "Christianity" today the Christianity of the time of Christ (assuming it was ever called “Christianity”). The movement we call "Christianity" today is a part of the great deception of Satan, "…which deceives the whole world." (Revelation 12:9) The brutal truth is that when we do a serious search on the very word “Christian”, we find a big question mark hanging over that word.

But back to the question, "Are the Jews of Israel today 'squatters' who should be ejected from the area and do we have scripture to that effect?" Please turn to Zephaniah 2:2. "Before the decree bring forth, before the day pass as the chaff, before the fierce anger of the Lord come upon you, before the day of the Lord's anger come upon you." (This is talking of the end of the age.)
3 "Seek you the Lord, all you meek of the earth, which have wrought his judgment; seek righteousness, seek meekness: it may be you shall be hid in the day of the Lord's anger.
4 "For Gaza shall be forsaken, and Ashkelon a desolation: they shall drive out Ashdod at the noon day, and Ekron shall be rooted up.
5 "Woe unto the inhabitants of the sea coast, the nation of the Cherethites! The word of the Lord is against you; O Canaan, the land of the Philistines, I will even destroy you, that there shall be no inhabitant.
6 "And the sea coast shall be dwellings and cottages for shepherds, and folds for flocks.
7 "And the coast shall be for the remnant of the house of Judah; they shall feed thereupon: in the houses of Ashkelon shall they lie down in the evening: for the Lord their God shall visit them, and turn away their captivity."

Those "bad mouthing" the Jews today should weigh their words carefully for many scriptures say God himself is going to take up their cause. But it won't be until they recognize and acknowledge their error of putting to death the Messiah.

The Jews have done some of the most profound literary works the world has known. Their greatest work is the preservation of the Word of God in the form of the Torah or the Old Testament.

They were the race chosen from which the Messiah was to be born. And it happened right on schedule according to their own predictions. But they rejected him because they wanted a King that would deliver them from the Roman oppression and they wanted it right then. They failed to crank all the prophecies into their judging process. The virgin birth they called illegitimate. The Crucifixion they called impotence. The resurrection they tried to deny. The witnesses they tried to stamp out.

They then even changed their calendar interpretation because Christ was born in the 4000th year since the creation of Adam as their own seers had predicted hundreds of years before the event. They now acknowledge only 4 rulers of the Persian Empire and dropped 243 years out of the calendar to make a case for Bar Kochba being the Messiah. They have become just another worldly religion, comparable to Catholics, who substitute myth for history in order to perpetuate their tradition and errors.

In spite of all this, they will acknowledge their error before the return of the Messiah. Someone has to take a message to them and, no doubt, it will not be well received. The messenger may even be killed. There is a scripture in Psalm 118, starting in verse 22, which confuses Jews. "The stone which the builders refused is become the head stone of the corner.
23 "This is the LORD'S doing; it is marvelous in our eyes.
24 "This is the day which the LORD has made; we will rejoice and be glad in it.
25 "Blessed be he that comes in the name of the LORD: we have blessed you out of the house of the LORD.

Christ quoted this scripture to the Jews in his day, Matthew 21:42. But the chilling part and that part of Christ's ministry which is thrown into the Jewish camp today is found in Matthew 23:38-39. "Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.
39 "For I say unto you, 'You shall not see me henceforth, till you shall say, Blessed is he that comes in the name of the LORD.'"

This is why I say the Jews will acknowledge their error before the appearance of their Messiah. It is written.

The "red heifer", whose ashes are to be the cleansing medium for Mt Moriah in preparation for the rebuilding of the temple, may be very close. The Jews thought she was already born and named her "Melody", however, some white hairs were found on Melody and this constitutes a "blemish". The last red heifer was more than 2000 years ago.

The initial question in this chapter was what is the source of Jew/Arab conflicts today? So is it religious ideologies, real estate or is it sibling rivalry? Perhaps it's some of all three, however, my opinion is that the overriding hatred stems from the split family (stepchildren) relationship. Also, the nation flying the “Jewish banner” today is not Jewish at all but gentile. No doubt there are some Jews living in “Israel” however the state is predominately Ashkenazi and Jewish by conversion only. They do, however, live by the traditions of the fathers and promote some of the same myths.

Chapter 7

GOD’S CHOSEN

Is there a group of people on earth today that can be called “God’s Chosen”?

Is it the Jews? Could it be those to whom God’s Messenger was sent and He was rejected by them? Why do the Jews write the word God as G_d? The Jews like to quote the book of Isaiah and especially chapter 11 where the wolf shall dwell with the lamb, but there are many portions of Isaiah they shun like the plague. One is 52:6 which says, “Therefore my people shall know my name…” Have the Jews even rejected the name of God? How about those people in America who call themselves “Christian”? Do they know the name of God? How many know that the name of God was taken out of the King James Edition of the Bible in some 7000 places? There is a publication today that restores the sacred names. I Kings, chapter 8 and II Chronicles, chapter 6 show the importance God attaches to His name and mankind would do well to heed.

Are all those folks who attend the temples of Baal in America going to get a head start on the rest of us and be “raptured” away to heaven before the time of Jacob’s trouble on planet earth? Or is this more myth? Are these the “wise” who understand the vision and message of the angel to the prophet Daniel? Or are these merely a portion of the “whole world” deceived by Satan? (Revelation 12:9)

Does the Bible hold out a promise of heaven to anyone? No, of course not. That was Satan’s dream --- to storm heaven and knock God off His throne. Heaven was also the promise of the jesuits to the American Indians if they would direct their worship toward the Vatican. Christ said in the book of John, chapter 7, verse 34: “You shall seek me and not find me: and where I am you cannot come.” He was talking to the officers sent by the chief priests and Pharisees. So if the Jews are the chosen people, and if anyone has a claim on heaven, you would think their leaders would have. But no, Christ told them they could not come to where he was going. So just what is the promise to the chosen and does it include “Christians”? Galatians 3:29 has this to say: “If you be Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s seed and heirs according to the promise.” What promise? The promise to Abraham. See Genesis 13 for starters. Abraham was promised real estate – not heaven.

Matthew chapter 5 says the meek shall inherit the earth, not heaven. Rev 5:10 says those who are made kings and priests, “…shall reign on the earth.”

Are these the “political saints” canonized by the Vatican? Or are these the saints of God martyred by the Vatican in the inquisition which is being progressively removed from encyclopedias and history? Have you tried recently to look up Bartholomew’s Massacre? Encyclopedias censored by the jesuits make it sound like nothing more than a barroom scuffle in which a few people died. Even the Catholic edited histories as late as the mid-1800s (of which I have several) admitted that 90,000 Huguenots were massacred. It appears that the massacre of the Branch Davidians in Waco, Texas was but a continuation of the Bartholomew’s Massacre. In case you missed the reason for that massacre (which CNN neglected to tell us), it was because they were keepers of the Sabbath which God sanctified and gave to Adam the first week of his life. Remember the Ruby Ridge “incident”? Randy Weaver and his family were also Sabbath observers.

So are there flesh and blood people on earth today that can be called the “chosen” of God? Why, yes, there are, however, it would appear that they have not yet been sealed with the seal of God in their foreheads. You can find the listing in Revelation 7 and the number is 144,000. The seal in their foreheads is a seal of physical protection in the final months of the age and is to keep them from destruction in the final months and years because they are to be the flesh and blood leaders on planet earth after the Kingdom of God replaces the kingdoms of men. These are not to be confused with the 144,000 of the first 3 or 4 verses of Revelation 14, who will be the firstfruits born into the spirit world and family of God. Those will be the saints of all ages gone by plus the few that will be living at the time of the Messiah’s return who will be born of spirit at that time. They will be set over the nations of the world with the 144,000 that are sealed for protection answering to them. (Spirit beings need no protection.)

Are we approaching an invasion of planet earth from outer space? Yes we are! World rulers have already been notified and this is why the renewed urgency for a new world order so engines of war can be consolidated under one head to fight against the invaders. You can see in Zechariah 14 how effective their resistance will be.

No doubt you have heard the “Christian teaching” that Jerusalem will be the touchdown point when Christ returns to claim the kingdom he qualified for at his death. Allow me to show you another scenario which appears more likely when we look at all the scriptures and put line upon line, precept upon precept. Take a look at Isaiah 63, starting in verse 1: “Who is this that comes from Edom with dyed garments from Bozrah? (not Basra) “This that is glorious in his apparel, traveling in the greatness of his strength: I that speak in righteousness, mighty to save.” This can be none other than the returning Messiah. Continuing in verse 2: “Why are you red in your apparel and your garments like him that treads in the winefat?” Verse 3: “I have trodden the winepress alone and of the people, there was none with me: for I will tread them in my anger and trample them in my fury and their blood shall be sprinkled upon my garments and I will stain all my raiment.” Verse 4: “For the day of vengeance is in my heart and the year of my redeemed is come.” Many religious folks of today seem to have forgotten (or perhaps never knew) that the God of love is also a God of wrath --- otherwise where does judgment come in?

Now keying off the word “winepress”, let’s go to Revelation 14:20 which is speaking of the final days of the age judging from the context: “And the winepress was trodden without the city and blood came out of the winepress even unto the horse bridles by the space of a thousand and six hundred furlongs.”

That is a 180 mile river of blood to a depth of horse bridles in some places. We saw in the above reference in Isaiah that the Messiah will be coming to Jerusalem from the direction of Edom and specifically Bozrah. So if we find Bozrah on a Bible map and extend out a compass line across it for 180 miles from Jerusalem, we find that it brings us to the real Mt Sinai which is a mountain in Saudi Arabia named Jabal Al Lawz. (See “Gold of Exodus” by Howard Blum.)

What is the size of the army that will be marching across there to Jerusalem? For this information we must go to Revelation 9:16 --- line upon line, here a little and there a little (Isaiah 28): “And the number of the horsemen was two hundred thousand thousand…” That’s 200 million! Now where on earth could such an army be raised in the foreseeable future? Look at China, India, and the Muslim countries. If you read all of the book of Daniel, you saw that the west (king of the north) will be at war with the “king of the south” in the last days. More on that later.

So it appears to me that the touchdown point will be in Saudi Arabia at the time the largest army ever mustered will be making it’s way across the Sinai Peninsula enroute to Jerusalem. This is the army that will be decimated and their bodies and their blood scattered across that area. We can see in Rev 16 that Christ’s arrival in Jerusalem constitutes the seventh trumpet and is the signal for the largest earthquake the earth has ever experienced (verse18). The seventh trumpet is the signal to initiate the first resurrection. (See I Corinthians 15). From this point on, the army at Christ’s back will be the resurrected saints. (See Revelation 17:14).

Chapter 8

TWO WITNESSES

Are the various radio preachers and televangelists prophets? Some are making some dire predictions concerning our future and the welfare of the world in general. Most are saying their information comes from the Bible and apparently they have a significant audience or else how could they stay on the air? But are they prophets? If Christ returned tomorrow, which of these would he endorse? Which church would he attend and on which day? Does the "Christianity" of today really represent the teachings of Christ? Or is the world today worshipping "another Jesus" as the apostle Paul alluded to in II Corinthians 11:4?

I have good news and bad news. The good news is that two prophets of God are walking the earth today. The bad news is the same. It depends on your perspective.

Now when someone states something as dogmatically as I just did in the previous paragraph, it brings our hackles up and we immediately wonder what right this person has to be so sure of anything in a world as uncertain as what we see today. It's part of our "perspective". But if you will but bear with me for a moment of my "folly", I will show you how I know these two prophets are walking the earth today.

I began questioning postulations of historians while in my twenties because it doesn't take much comparing to realize that not all historians are honest. Some have agendas. Some have fantasies. Some have egos. But virtually all are licensed by politicians and will dance to whatever tune is called by those they work for. If you compare different editions of the same encyclopedia you can begin to see from one edition to the next the facts that are "edited out", facts that are downplayed, facts that are ignored, myths beginning to replace facts, etc. It doesn't take a phd in philosophy to see that histories are edited according to what is "politically correct" for that generation.

One of my long term projects in life required me to debunk many myths which have been passed down to mankind as history. To illustrate, let me give you one of these myths: "Columbus discovered America." This is absolute nonsense and yet this myth was promoted by the Smithsonian Institute in the late 1800s. Who were the "Indians"? Non humans? How to explain the world's largest pyramid outside St Louis, Missouri? How to explain the 25 acre religious compound in New Hampshire which is 4,000 years old or the copper mines in the Lake Superior area which were in operation 3-4,000 years ago. This isn't done. The myth was simply put out and then university college professors who did not support the myth were quietly dismissed. (This was gleaned from Steven Collins’ book, “The Lost Ten Tribes --- Found”.)

Anyway, I realized early on that archaeologists prove the veracity of the Bible on a yearly basis, despite the fact that archaeology is also tainted with “religious color”. So for all my research, I measure it against the yardstick of the Bible. The Bible is an integrated book. Even though it was written by various authors over a time span of over 2,000 years, the separate parts all fit together. It should be noted that archaeologists have agendas also and it begins to appear that archaeology was a tool created by the Vatican (or taken over by the Vatican) for taking over any dig into the past that could produce a challenge to Vatican presumed “authority”. These finds must be made “politically correct” before being released to the general public. And I am not so naïve as to believe that the Bible is the unadulterated “Word Of God”. It has been tampered with by Jews and Catholics alike. However, Timothy was commended by the apostle Paul for “…rightly dividing truth.” We also must rightly divide truth.

Now, about the two prophets; how will we be able to recognize them? Will they wear $1,500 suits and Rolex watches? Will they be the religionists with the biggest following? Will they wear a cross around their neck and have a cross made into their robe? Will they have a retinue of forty people bowing to them continuously. If this is what we are looking for, I'm afraid we may miss them for the first part of their ministry because they will be wearing sackcloth. Burlap perhaps! But we will get to see them although it may not be our favorite part of the news. Newscasters will not portray them in a favorable light and no doubt will give an on the spot analysis of what they have to say and it will not be complimentary. Their prophecy will be discredited and they will be made the laughingstock of the world. But they will be known worldwide. They will be a household word even if in derision.

How do I know all this? Again, going back to the yardstick of the Bible and turning to Revelation the eleventh chapter, verse 3 says, "And I will give power unto my two witnesses, and they shall prophesy a thousand two hundred and threescore days, (1,260), clothed in sackcloth."

Sackcloth is reserved for times of great mourning. David wore sackcloth when Abner was murdered. II Samuel 3:31. Hezekiah wore sackcloth when he felt Jerusalem was about to be destroyed by the Assyrian army --- II Kings 19:1. Job wore sackcloth when he thought his time was almost at an end --- Job 16:15. Sackcloth worn by these two is a message that America is in dire peril.

So does this mean we can believe anyone we see in sackcloth? Well, not necessarily. Let's look at what Christ says about his prophets. Luke 4:24 "Verily I say unto you, No prophet is accepted in his own country." Hey, that disqualifies a lot of would be prophets, huh?

So if they wear sackcloth and are thrown out of their homeland, we can trust them, right? Well, not necessarily. We need to look a little further. If you read Revelation 11:3 quoted above, you should have seen that it said, "And I will give power unto my two witnesses..." These are not mere politicians. These have no agenda of their own. If they were trying to build a following, they would definitely have a more palatable message than the one they will be giving.

How will this power be used? Drop down to verse 5. "And if any man will hurt them, fire proceeds out of their mouth, and devours their enemies: and if any man will hurt them, he must in this manner be killed."
6. "These have power to shut heaven, that it rain not in the days of their prophecy: and have power over waters to turn them to blood, and to smite the earth with all plagues, as often as they will."

This is the power of God backing his two prophets which will be telling the world of things to come. Not a politically correct message but a message direct from God. One or both of these prophets may also be the one or ones to take a message to the nation of Israel. We see in the 40th chapter of Isaiah a message to be taken to Jerusalem which suggests that the messenger will be an outsider --- non Jewish.

So how can we be sure these prophets are alive today? Even non religious folks are beginning to see that we have no political solutions to today's world problems. Think for just a moment of the implications of nuclear proliferation. The Genie is out of the bottle and now everyone is getting in on the nuclear act. India and Pakistan are rattling their sabers but is anyone looking at Korea? What about China? And where is Russia's nuclear arsenal today and who controls it? Where are all of Russia's nuclear submarines and who controls them?

And this is only nuclear. What about biological capabilities. The American federal government has already put 120 American cities on rigorous training to handle death on a large scale. They admit, grudgingly, that the biological capability is already on American soil to perpetrate this "death on a large scale."

When we crank in the pollution of air, land and water, and when we consider the potential for destruction of the U.S. through the corruption of U.S. money, when we look at the "One World Plantation" envisioned by the aspiring despots of the world, it is indeed a blind soul who cannot see that we are in the twilight years of this age.

The Jews are preparing feverishly for the building of the third temple or even a tabernacle where they can restart the animal sacrifices which were cut off at the destruction of the temple in 70 AD. The "red heifer" needed for the cleansing of Mt Moriah is very near a reality, thanks to the assist of Mr Clyde Lott of Canton, Mississippi. I am not convinced that this third temple will be built before the end of the age. Nor is that required for the Jews to begin sacrifices. The book of Ezra shows that sacrifices were begun before the second temple was built. How long do you think animal sacrifices will be allowed to go on in the "animal rights mentality" of the world today? A month? Two? When the sacrifices are stopped, then the clock begins ticking on the last 1,290 (Daniel 12:11) days of this age before the appearance of the Messiah and the ushering in of a new government for planet earth.

As I noted previously, the two prophets will have some awesome powers; powers that will make politicians drool, however, prophets are required sometimes to take their faith to the wire. Tradition has it that Isaiah was put into a log and sawed in half for his role as a prophet. John the Baptist was beheaded because he "bad-mouthed" the king. Some were skinned alive, buried alive, burned at the stake and whatever other horrendous tortures that could be devised by religionist sons of Satan the devil.

Let's just take a peek at the previews and see what is in store for these two. Revelation 11:7 says, "And when they shall have finished their testimony, the beast that ascends out of the bottomless pit shall make war against them, and shall overcome them, and kill them.
8. "And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified.
9. "And they of the people and kindreds and tongues and nations shall see their dead bodies three days and an half, and shall not suffer their dead bodies to be put in graves."

See how popular folks are who bring the word of God. Not even given a decent burial. What do you suppose their message is that so infuriates the whole world? Rush Limbaugh infuriates a few but even he wouldn't get this kind of treatment. What kind of message could infuriate the whole world? Remember these are prophets, so it must be of a religious nature but have you ever heard a sermon that so riled you that you would want to see the preacher killed and left to rot on top of the ground?

Let's look again at their powers to see if we can get a clue as to their message. Verse 6 says, "These have power to shut heaven, that it rain not in the days of their prophecy..." Sounds like the spirit of Elijah. The king of Israel had messengers searching all the surrounding nations for Elijah in hopes of getting the drought suspended. Many Israelites moved to the Carthage area in North Africa at that time. When the king's messengers finally did find Elijah and he came and prayed for rain, he did more than just pray for rain. He showed the utter powerlessness of Jezebel's prophets of Baal and ordered the people to kill 400 of them. So he attacked the mainstream religion of the day. (You can get the rest of the story in I Kings 18.) That's a hate crime, huh? The only way these two prophets will be able to function for the three and one half year period of time is because of the power they exercise, power delegated by God.

Picking up the rest of verse 6, it says, "...and have power over waters to turn them to blood..." Where have we heard this? Moses! Does this mean the other prophet will be in the spirit of Moses? Can we begin to see why these two prophets are going to be hated so and why the people remaining on the earth would want them killed and would want to add the ultimate insult by leaving their bodies to rot in the streets? Is the three and one half year drought worldwide? And do all the people of the world know it was called by the two prophets? And since they have the power to call down other plagues, what do you suppose those will be?

Going on in verse 10: "And they that dwell upon the earth shall rejoice over them, and make merry, and shall send gifts one to another; because these two prophets tormented them that dwelt on the earth." When does the world “make merry and send gifts”?

Their celebration is short lived however; continuing in verse 11, "And after three days and an half the Spirit of life from God entered into them, and they stood upon their feet; and great fear fell upon them which saw them."

These two prophets are alive today and their cloak of anonymity will be shed in the next few months or years and they will appear to the world to give a message that will be as unpopular as the one given by Christ almost 2,000 years ago. They will have to tell the Jews that their Messiah has already been here but they were so focused on the law that they missed him. There's one group alienated.

Next they will have to tell the "Christians" that there was nothing in the scriptures nor in what Christ said during his ministry that could be construed to mean that he was doing away with the law. In fact, he said in plain language that "Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law..." They will have to tell "Christians" that grace where there is no law is meaningless, and that just as it says in Hebrews 4: "There remains therefore a rest (the margin says the keeping of a Sabbath) to the people of God." They will have to be shown that the days which the world considers "Jewish Holidays" are not Jewish at all but as God says in Leviticus 23:2, "...these are My feast days." Verse 31 shows that they are "statutes forever."

Now we have two major groups in the world alienated and must go now for the third large body and that is the Muslim. They will have to be told that God is yet going to fight Israel's battles and that a Jew named Yeshua HaMashiac is going to rule the earth from Jerusalem. How do you think this message is going to set with the Muslim world? They will have to be shown scriptures such as Zechariah 12:9 which says, "And it shall come to pass in that day, that I will seek to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem. Verse 7 says, "The Lord also shall save the tents of Judah first..." The first use of the term "Jew" in the Bible is in II Kings 16 and shows the Jews, (tribe of Judah) at war with Israel. The books of I and II Kings are dedicated to showing the separation of the kingdoms of Israel and Judah and gives the king lists showing them developing as separate nations. Israel (or the part remaining in the area of Samaria) went into captivity in about 720 BC and you can find the story in II Kings 17.

The Buddhists, Shintoists, Hindus along with all the other scattered religions of the world will have to be shown that their gods are not God at all. The multitude of religions in the world is but the deceptive work of that old serpent, Satan the devil, who, as it says in Revelation 12:9, "...deceives the whole world." That deception is well nigh complete now, and therefore, so is this age we now live in.

So who are these two prophets and are we seeing them on TV even today?
Are they popular religious personalities with a large following? Perhaps one of the smaller religious groups? Or are these two unknowns in today’s religious world? Will they be positioned center stage by God Himself and deliver a message that is totally politically incorrect? If we study the book of Exodus, we will find that Moses did not become the leader of Israel by building a political following over a period of years. He was drafted for the position and placed in it by God Himself. If we look at I Kings 19:10, we can see that Elijah thought he was the only man left that had a knowledge of the Creator. The 7,000 that God had reserved were not tithe paying members of the “Church of Elijah”, (verse 18) or Elijah would surely have been aware of them. He felt that he stood alone and Jezebel wanted his head because he had her religious prophets killed. See chapters 17 and 18. If one of the two witnesses is in the spirit of Elijah, will he have the support of a tithe paying congregation --- or would it be more revealing if he worked with only the support of the Creator? (Perhaps we should look into Executive Order 13397 and see that all ordained ministers in America have been made agents of the federal government by that order.) Will he and his counterpart be given judgment powers to determine who deserves to die? Revelation 11:5 says, “If any man will hurt them, fire proceeds out of their mouth and devours their enemies…” Assuming America is still a nation at that time, how do you think the citizenry would react to a message that there will be no rain for the next three and one half years?

The job of the two prophets will not be an enviable position but it will be done --- it is written.

Chapter 9

LOVE/HATE

Have we ever looked seriously at the love/hate relationship on planet earth? Is it healthy? Has it occurred to anyone that love and hate are acquired traits? If this be true, then our situation today is solvable through education.

However, the will has to be there among the ruling class to turn education in the right direction. Is it possible through our current public schools? Whether or not we realize it, these were created for the purpose of teaching loyalty and obedience to government rather than teaching truth and what is right. When we come to understand it, they are for the purpose of teaching worship of the image of the beast.

But perhaps we need to start more basic because few Americans even know the definition of love. It is another of those we have lost the meaning of through education. It is another of those words that needs to be defined for each audience because of the many different perceptions of the meaning of the word. If, of course, we were a nation following the precepts of our Creator, we would want to know His definition of love and all the others could be discarded. So where would we go to find that definition? Would it be to the scriptures? Let’s try Romans 13, verse 10, which says, “Love works no ill to his neighbor: therefore, love is the fulfilling of the law.” We could even expand on that by turning to II John, verse 6, which says, “And this is love, that we walk after His commandments. This is the commandment, ‘That as you have heard from the beginning, you should walk in it.’”

Mens’ laws, however are not laws at all but regulations. Laws are sanctioned by God and are to promote freedom. Regulations are sanctioned by lawyers and are for promoting slavery. But we, in America, are a free nation, right? Yeah, right. Hopefully this article will show you a new perspective on “America’s freedom”.

The living God brought out of Egypt a nation of slaves some three million strong and gave them His laws, statutes and judgments to live by and to show the world what can be accomplished through doing this. In other words, Israel of old was to be a showcase nation to introduce God to the rest of the world. Did they do it? No, they didn’t. They wanted to be like the nations around them, so they adopted the customs and religions of those nations and mixed their race with the other races to become a “melting pot” and have fallen into idolatry like the Israel of old. It would be more correct to say they (we) are simply continuing in the idolatry of old.

To be sure, a kingdom does need laws. That is one of the four basic requirements for a kingdom. Those four requirements are: 1) A king. This is pretty obvious. 2) Subjects. 3) Territory, or a place to locate that kingdom, and 4) laws in order to keep the kingdom marching in step. If a kingdom adopts and lives by the laws of God, then there is no need for a senate to busy themselves making conflicting “laws”, self serving “laws”, empire building “laws”, tax “laws”, state “laws”, federal “laws”, etc.

Has anyone considered the ludicrousness of “laws” in America? If someone steals my car and trashes it, what remuneration can I expect when, as and if he/she is apprehended? Even the question sounds ridiculous, huh? Because the answer is “None”! We cage the offender for a week or two or a year or two and charge the general populace for feeding and housing him/her and if there is a monetary fine levied, it goes to the courts. Is this insanity or what?

The increasingly predatory courts and law enforcement build themselves a bigger and better firewall each year to protect them from the public. Have you tried to call into government offices only to be routed through six or eight recorded messages? We have become so accustomed to the ridiculous, we consider it normal.

Now businesses, especially the larger ones and all the multinational ones are adopting the government techniques and it cuts down on the phone calls greatly. It also drives another nail into the coffin of a once great nation. If you wonder why I used the term “once great”, then look at where our manufacturing has gone. Look at where our agriculture is. Look at the federal mess in our capitol and look at where the value of your money has gone. Look at the growth of banks and insurance companies which is directly proportional to the growth of the federal government. Is our government at war with the American people?

So what does all this have to do with love and hate? Everything! We talk of “hate crimes” in America today and yet we seem to be turning the nation over to those who hate us just as fast as congress can make “laws” to facilitate that giveaway. Is there any congressional interest in stemming the flow of illegal aliens across our southern border? Is there any congressional interest in correcting the phony money situation that is robbing Americans blind? Is there any congressional interest in anything except feathering their own nests? Has anyone really identified the enemy today? Is it really the Al Queda terrorists or was that name and myth produced in a studio in Texas? Is Russia and China the enemy or is it more like Pogo Possum said years ago, “We have found the enemy and they is us!” Are we about to join the ranks of nations that once were?

It seems that Americans’ last hopes of a democratic solution were dashed when the candidates were trotted out for the 2008 elections. The managed media was successful in denying coverage to any candidate with any real solutions and we see gladiators like McCain and Huckabee on the one side with Hillary and Obama on the opposing side. Isn’t this one hell of a choice! Now even the religionists feel obligated to pick a side and align themselves with one of the choices offered. Non aligned religions don’t get regular bags of candy from homeland security --- and, oh yes, a 501- C3 exemption.

Love is “…the fulfilling of the law”. What law? We find that answer in Romans 7:7, which says: “I had not known sin but by the law: for I had not known lust except the law had said, ‘You shall not covet.’”

So if love is the fulfilling of the law (of God), then what is hatred? Is it a departure from the law and is it described as “iniquity” (lawlessness) by God? If we contend that the law “…has been done away”, would that leave us “without law” or in a state of iniquity (lawlessness)? Please note what Christ had to say in Matthew 7:22-23: “Many will say unto me in that day, ‘Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in your name and in your name cast out devils and in your name done many wonderful works?’”

Please note Christ’s answer in verse 23: “And then I will profess unto them, ‘I never knew you: depart from me, you that work iniquity’”. (lawlessness)

Chapter 10

WATCHMEN

Many self styled prophets have at one time or another claimed to be the watchman of Ezekiel 3. Herbert Armstrong was one who claimed to be this watchman and since his death, virtually all the splinter group leaders from the Worldwide Church of God claim this title. One has to wonder if they have read the commission and the responsibility carefully. One has to wonder if they are aware of the qualifications set for prophets by Christ Himself. We find it in Matthew 13:57. “A prophet is not without honor save in his own country and in his own house.” Does this rule out a vast majority of self styled prophets? Are those “prophets” who have received a 501-C3 tax status “honored” in their own country?

And those who still claim to be the watchman, what are they watching? Are they watching what is going on in Israel? Are they watching when the Mayan calendar ends? Are they watching the touch and go games of our U.S. politicians and the potential it has for collapsing the world economy? Are they watching the Leo Wanta scandal? What are they doing about it?

Ah, but there is more, much more, that it would appear the watchman should be watching and announcing. Shouldn’t he be screaming for God’s people to get out of NYC and virtually all the east coast cities? Why? Let’s address that.

Since Ezekiel was the prophet that put out the clarion call concerning the watchman, perhaps we should look there for more details concerning what the watchman needs to be aware of and what he needs to announce to God’s people.

Let’s look at one of Ezekiel’s prophecies, which it appears that Dwight Moody, Henry Halley and all those putting out Bible commentaries have missed. We all know that in the 28th chapter of Ezekiel, God begins the chapter addressing a man and shifts gears to address Satan the devil. Perhaps we need to take a better look at that scenario. Most Bible students see this as a two stage prophecy with God talking to a man at the beginning of chapter 28 but then switches His address to Satan in verses 11-12. More serious students of the Bible pick up on a third stage in this prophecy with stage one beginning in chapter 26 where God is addressing ancient Tyre and informing the prince or king that He is going to send nations against him like waves of the sea (verse 3). He (God) goes on to say He will send Nebuchadnezzar against Tyre (or Tyrus) and that they will reduce the trading center of Tyre to rubble and cast the rubble into the sea (verse 12). This happened as you can read in Halley’s Handbook commentary on Ezekiel 26. We should keep in mind that this destruction was carried out by armies.

Now let’s look at chapter 27 where God is again addressing Tyrus. Another Tyrus?? Let’s see. Verse 3. “And say unto Tyrus, ‘O thou that art situate at the entry of the sea, which art a merchant of the people for many isles…’” Verse 4 says, “Thy borders are in the midst of the seas…” So is there a second Tyre that has borders in the midst of the seas?

Reading on down through chapter 27 and comparing it to Revelation 18, which is the destruction of Babylon, we have to wonder if these are describing the same city or trading complex. Much of the wording sounds the same. The scenario sounds quite similar.

In order to assure ourselves this is not talking about Old Tyre, let’s drop on down to verse 26 where it says, “…the east wind hath broken thee in the midst of the seas.” I submit to you that the only thing the east wind would have brought to Old Tyre is sand because it was situated on the western shore of Syria at the southern tip. Now here we have a Tyre that is going to be broken by an east wind and destroyed but not by armies. We are talking about another Tyre (or Tyrus), and you can see that it also is to fall. Drop on down to verse 34. “In the time when you shall be broken by the seas in the depths of the waters your merchandise and all your company in the midst of you shall fall.” So we can begin to see that this is a four stage prophecy rather than a two or three. In stage one (Ezekiel 26), God is talking through the prophet Ezekiel, to ancient Tyre and showing how their demise will come. Stage two (Ezekiel 27) is where God is talking to “another Tyre” (or Babylon) that is to be destroyed by the seas. Stage three is where evidently the one known as the end time beast is being addressed (Ezekiel 28) and stage four shifts to Satan the devil. (Ezekiel 28)

“Come out of her my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins and that ye receive not of her plagues” (Rev 18:4).

Where is the city today that does all the trading described in chapter 27? Is it the “Babylon on the Hudson”? Could it be that NYC is being described here???

I realize fully that Revelation 18:9, speaking of the kings of the earth, “…shall see the smoke of her burning.” So most of us have assumed that NYC would be nuked, (because of the short time --- one hour --- to accomplish the destruction), however, would not fire be the likely aftermath of a killer tsunami that ruptured hundreds of gas lines? All that’s needed is ignition.

Try to envision what meteorologists are telling us about the Canary Islands off the Northwest coast of Africa. This island group is a super caldron comparable to the one Yellowstone is sitting on. When, as and if it erupts in a fashion comparable to the last eruption thousands of years ago, it will send a wall of water toward our east coast over a hundred feet high and traveling at the speed of a jet plane. Can you picture a train hitting a building at 400 miles per hour? Now try to picture a hundred thousand trains hitting a city at that speed.

In order to underscore what you have just read and put it into bold print, let’s look at what Jeremiah had to say about the destruction of Babylon in chapter 51, beginning in verse 41. “How is Sheshack (another name for Babylon) taken! And how is the praise of the whole earth surprised! How is Babylon become an astonishment among the nations!
42 “The sea is come up upon Babylon: she is covered with the multitude of the waves thereof.”

Old Babylon was over 100 miles from the sea!

In verse 43 we can see that there are more cities than just one. “Her cities are a desolation…”

Ah, now, take a look at verse 46. Do we get a clue here as to how long after the notice has been put out? “And lest your heart faint and ye fear for the rumor that shall be heard in the land; a rumor shall both come one year and after that in another year shall come a rumor and violence in the land, ruler against ruler.”

Will we heed the Revelation 18:20 command to, “Rejoice over her, you heavens and you holy apostles and prophets for God has avenged you on her.” Just be sure you rejoice in private, because, no doubt, that will be a hate crime.

Have our “watchmen” been asleep at the switch? Perhaps we should look at what God says about them. Isaiah 56:10 “His watchmen are blind: they are all ignorant, they are all dumb dogs, they cannot bark; sleeping, lying down, loving to slumber.” Verse 11 goes on, “Yea they are greedy dogs which can never have enough and they are shepherds that cannot understand: they all look to their own
way, every one for his gain, from his quarter.” Perhaps the reason they cannot bark is because they are wearing 501-C3 muzzles.

Chapter 11

GOG AND MAGOG

For many years I have heard self styled "prophets" expounding on Gog and Magog and saying that the little nation named Israel is about to be invaded by these two powers and that this invasion is to precede the "Coming of the Lord". These "prophets" include not only evangelicals but offshoots from the Worldwide Church of God. Isn't it time we laid this matter to rest?

The prophecy quoted as the basis for their belief is Ezekiel 38. Let's look at that scripture and see perhaps what they neglect to quote. Verse one says, "And the word of the Lord came unto me saying: 2 'Son of man, set thy face against Gog and the land of Magog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal and prophesy against him. 3 And say, 'Thus saith the Lord God; Behold,I am against you, O Gog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal: 4 And I will turn you back and put hooks into your jaws and I will bring you forth and all your army, horses and horsemen, all of them clothed with all sorts of armor, even a great company with bucklers and shields, all handling swords.'" Verses 5-6 shows who will accompany them and verse 7 is a command to be prepared and also to be a guard unto those with them.

Verse 8 gets right down to where the rubber meets the road. It deals with the time setting. Let's look.

"After many days you shall be visited: IN THE LATTER YEARS YOU SHALL COME INTO THE LAND THAT IS BROUGHT BACK FROM THE SWORD and is gathered out of many people, against the mountains of Israel, which have been always waste but is brought forth out of the nations..." Is this speaking of Israel today? By "Israel", I mean, of course, the little nation named Israel which serious Bible students think is the nation of Judah.

To those who would answer "Yes" to the above question, I would invite them to read the final line of verse 8 which says, "...and they shall dwell safely, all of them." My question is this, "Is Israel dwelling safely today?" Any of them? The "...dwelling safely" is repeated in verse 11 and again, I would ask, "How many Israelis dwell safely today?"

Those who espouse this view of prophecy answer with something like this: "Perhaps the UN will make Israel a safe place to dwell by that time." But in the first part of verse 8, it gives the time setting as "...in the latter years". When is this?

Let's continue our study in the book of Revelation, chapter 20. It begins with the beginning of what is called the Millennium. Verse 1 starts with an angel coming down and binding Satan for 1,000 years, "And AFTER THAT, he must be loosed for a little while." (verse 3). Verse 4 goes on to say that the saints lived and reigned with Christ for a 1,000 years (after that). Verse 7 says, "AND WHEN THE 1,000 YEARS ARE EXPIRED, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison." Verse 8! "And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, GOG AND MAGOG, TO GATHER THEM TOGETHER TO BATTLE. The number of whom is as the sand of the sea." Verse 9 "And they went up on the breadth of the earth, and compassed the camp of the saints about and the beloved city: and fire came down from God and devoured them."

Now we are talking here about Gog and Magog - right? And it says explicitly "...after the 1,000 years." Where then do all these "prophets" get off saying the little nation of Israel is about to be invaded by Gog and Magog?

Chapter 12

THE HIDDEN AGENDA OF TELEVISION

I am not a TV watcher. I find even the newscasts insulting and the commercials nauseating. I have not owned a TV for the past 35 years. Now with this backdrop, I feel I can view TV more objectively than perhaps all the TV addicts combined. Remember the old adage that you can cook a frog to death and he won’t jump out of the pan if you heat the water slowly? Whether or not this is true, I don’t know, but it appears to be true of the American people.

TV is a form of worship in America --- and before you challenge that statement, please check Webster’s definition of worship. TV is our baby sitter, our pastime, our window on the world and the Coliseum or sewer piped right into our living room.

With this as an introduction, it becomes obvious that I do not have a neutral position concerning TV. I consider it a curse and a tool which is being used to destroy America --- even if it was not designed with that purpose in mind.
And it has been used for that purpose since the early days of TV as I will show you.

So who controls TV? Who decides what will be aired as news? Who decides what your children will watch as cartoons? Who dreams up such mindless creations as “SpongeBob”? Now each child can have his own hand-held set with a CD or DVD of his favorite programs. Has anyone with an ounce of brain power considered where this is going? Are there really effective governmental controls and if so why aren’t they working? Or is government, much like the churches, part of the problem? The prophet Isaiah is quoted as saying, in chapter 3, verse 12, “As for my people, children are their oppressors and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead you cause you to err and destroy the way of your paths.”

Is it happening? Have you ever sat down to watch what your children are watching and try to determine the underlying messages which you have approved by allowing them to watch that program?

Have we ever stopped to consider how nations are destroyed and whether it could happen to us? Do we believe in cause and effect? Do we believe there is really a God that presides over the destinies of nations as was so eloquently stated by our forefathers in the setting up of this nation? Or have we been indoctrinated into the Darwinian folly promoted by the chimera of TV? If we believe there is a God presiding over the destinies of nations and of this planet, then we would do well to heed the words He has spoken through His prophets. Isaiah 24:5 says, “The earth also is defiled under the inhabitants thereof, because they have transgressed the laws, changed the ordinance, broken the everlasting covenant.” Do we even know what is being spoken of here?

In order to set the stage for showing the agenda of television, a recap of history is in order --- true history and not Darwinian folly. Since archaeology has consistently proven the historical accuracy of the Bible on a yearly basis, let’s use it rather than the political modifications of national histories. Yes, the Bible has an agenda too and that agenda is that there is a Supreme Being that created the heavens and earth and that we exist at His pleasure. When He becomes displeased with us then we cease to exist. This scenario has been played out many times in the scriptures. When mankind was less than 1,600 years old, they had already begun to experiment with crossing genesis kinds which was specifically forbidden by the Creator. There is much evidence to indicate that the “mythical” creatures of ancient Greece were not all myths but that genetic tinkering, by the time of Noah, had reached such a high that the only family left that was genetically pure was Noah and his family. The rest were destroyed. Are we witnessing any genetic tinkering today?

God chose Abraham to found a nation that would introduce God to the rest of the world. They were to do this by becoming a showcase nation, living by the laws, statutes, precepts and judgments of God so that the rest of the world could look on in awe and learn the way to live in peace, harmony and prosperity. The Creator even delivered them out of the slavery of Egypt, some 3 million strong and destroyed Egypt in the process. Here was a ready made nation, under the direction of Moses, in the wilderness, being fed and protected by God Himself and He was even living with them in their camp for a while --- see Exodus 25:22. So did they become the showcase nation? No they did not. They wanted to adopt the heathen customs of the nations around them and ultimately wanted a king so they could be more like the other nations.

While they were yet in the wilderness and being fed by God, the nations around them began to see the handwriting on the wall and started making plans to dispose of them. The king of the nation of Moab sent for the Pontificus Maximus, whose name was Balaam, and offered him great wealth if he could place a curse on this nation that threatened to engulf the entire mid east. You can pick up the story in the book of Numbers. Balaam was forbidden by God to place a curse on the nation God had chosen and the story in the book of Numbers ends on that note, however, in the book of Revelation, we find where God gave a message to the prophet John to give to the seven churches. To the church at Pergamos, God told John to write, Rev 2:14 “… but I have a few things against you, because you have there them that hold the doctrine of Balaam…” What is the doctrine of Balaam?

If you read the above referenced account in the book of Numbers, chapters 22 through 24, you will see that Balaam’s prophecy ends with chapter 24. The first verse of chapter 25 says, “And Israel abode in Shittim and the people began to commit whoredom with the daughters of Moab.” This should give a clue as to what the doctrine of Balaam was. It will take considerable research in this world of religious confusion to discover what really happened however, here is how Balaam found a way to extract a fee from Moab even though he was not allowed to place a curse on Israel. He told Balak that while he (Balaam) was forbidden to place a curse on Israel, that Balak could cause Israel’s God to destroy them if he would simply intermingle with them through inter-marriage and fornication. Chapter 25 makes it quite plain that this is what happened. Israel was forbidden to allow interracial marriages (Deuteronomy 7:3). Jeremiah 50:37 is a prophecy for the last days and makes it quite plain that the mingled people will be taken out by the sword again at the time of the end of the age. For those indoctrinated into today’s religious myths, the end of the age is not the end of the world.

So we see that Israel, even before they had a piece of real estate on which to locate their new nation, was being attacked by forces trying dilute their blood lines for the purpose of destroying them as a nation. Stay with me, this gets even better.

The Israelites were given the real estate between the Nile and the Euphrates as a fulfillment of a promise made to Abraham (Genesis 12:7, 13:17 and 15:18), which seems terribly unjust to many people today and especially until we get the rest of the story. The rest of the story can be gleaned from the book of Jubilees which is not part of scripture but is historically sound nevertheless. Noah divided up the earth among his three sons, Shem, Ham and Japheth. Ham (the father of Canaan) was given Africa. Japheth was given the far east and Shem was given the middle east. They bound them-selves with a curse if they failed to follow Noah’s instructions. Canaan, however, was comfortable in the land of the mid east that bore his name during the days of Biblical history and refused to move on into Africa and thereby became a squatter on Shem’s land. No big deal --- the land was not overcrowded in those days and they grew into a multitude of nation/cities.

God has a way of leveling playing fields and the time had come to turn the land back to Abraham’s seed through the line of Isaac (Genesis 17:21). This is why Israel was commanded to kill ‘em all! The rest is history. Israel did not do as instructed and just as God had predicted, the Canaanites in their midst became a “…thorn in their flesh”, and continues to be so unto this day.

Finally they had a civil war between the tribes of Israel (Jacob) and separated into two nations. Ten tribes chose themselves a king named Jeroboam and established their capital at Samaria. The tribe of Judah plus some Benjamites, Levites and Simeonites stayed with their king which was Solomon’s son Rheoboam and retained Jerusalem as their capital. You can get the rest of the story in the books of I and II Kings, along with their separate king lists.

Those under Jeroboam called their nation Israel while those under Rheoboam called their nation Judah. Both have impacted history dramatically although much dust has been thrown in the air, by those with global ambitions, to give the impression that the little nation of Israel today is the remnant of ancient Israel. There is much more here than meets the eye and this myth is one of the major pillars in the construction of a global dominion.

When ancient Israel had continued in their pursuit of idolatry for a period longer than America has been a nation, God’s displeasure with them had reached a point to where He simply decided that to let them continue would be futile. So he marshaled against them the nation of Assyria who had the resources and the armies to handle the problem. And handle it they did. You can pick up some of the story in II Kings 17. It also tells why God allowed this. They were butchered by Shalmaneser’s armies and the survivors were taken in chains to Assyria as slaves. Why? Read the referenced scripture for the answer.

They went into captivity and lost their identity as the nation of Israel and became Germans, English, Swiss, Swedes, Finlanders, Belgians, French, etc. This has been pretty well hidden from the world at large but can be picked up on in books such as Steven Collins’ “Lost Ten Tribes of Israel --- Found”.

The other nation of Israel named Judah did not learn from the experience of their counterpart but also fell into idolatry --- worshipping wealth, position, images and government --- and they also were the victims of God’s wrath and the rod of correction this time was the Babylonian army under the king-ship of Nebuchadnezzar. He slaughtered the tribe of Judah (Jews) by the hundreds of thousands and took the remnant in chains to Babylon. One would naturally wonder why God would allow His chosen people to suffer this kind of defeat and slavery. The 9th chapter of the book of Daniel should help to clear this up.

They were held in slavery for 70 years before the first wave was released to return to Jerusalem to rebuild the city and the Temple which had been destroyed by Babylonian troops. So what did they do upon their return? They began to mingle with the surrounding populace. You can read the account in the book of Ezra along with the outcome.

Now let’s cut to the 21st century AD. Where are we in the stream of time according to God’s reckoning? If those who do chronologies are correct (such as James Ussher), then 6000 years, since the sin of Adam, was up in 1997. The Mayan calendar (some 5000 years old) ends abruptly on Dec 21, 2012. We see a world today scrambling to consolidate all military power under one world ruler. This, of course, is not publicized because it would not be politically correct, but for those watching events that drive world news, it becomes obvious. Could it be that these seemingly unrelated events hold some significance for us today? Is it just possible that we are on the eve of a new age?

Now with that introduction, let’s get down to the answer to the real agenda of TV today. What is that agenda? To destroy America. Before you begin to write that hate mail, hear me out. The agenda of TV is integration and it has been since TV was in it’s infancy in the 50s. I can still remember the lines of a jingle that was aired on TV in Washington State from 1 to 5 times per hour. It went like this:

You can get white milk from a brown skinned cow
The color of the skin doesn’t matter anyhow
Oh ho ho, don’t you know
You can get white milk from a brown skinned cow.

So what’s wrong with that jingle? Well it was being repeated especially for the benefit (?) of children several times per hour in the state of Washington at the time federal troops were in Little Rock, Arkansas to enforce integrated schooling.

So what’s wrong with integrated schools? Just this --- it’s the political solution of the nations of the world under the direct supervision of Satan the devil. See Luke 4 where Satan showed Christ “…all the kingdoms of the world…” and told Him, “All these are delivered unto me and I give them to whomever I choose.” You see there isn’t an army in the world today with enough power and resources to challenge America much less reduce us to slavery. So when we persisted in our idolatry, such as offering up our children to Molech, as did the Israel of old, then God provided a different kind of army in our very midst to destroy Israel (we are one of the two birthright nations of Israel but our chief rulers are Chaldean) and bring her to slavery. And yes, we will be sold into Egypt again. See Deuteronomy 28:68.

Now in order for you to see the agenda I’m talking about, you need to watch the cartoons your children watch. Not only do they mix the characters in the cartoon between black and white, they show pre adolescent black and white of opposite sex (that seems to be of utmost importance) sitting watching the cartoon.

Next, take a look at the news casts and see how many news pairs you see of black and white. Again of opposite sex (that seems to be of utmost importance).

Now go to the commercials and look for the black/white contrast. Does it become obvious?

Now check the soaps and the movies. Even the COPS movies team up a black officer with a white officer and different sexes of course.

Are we being blitzed with the doctrine of Balaam? Could it have any purpose other than national destruction?

So who is trying to destroy us and why? This gets into a rather deep study and has spanned many years but I shall try to condense it for you. Let’s start with the book of Revelation. There are many misconceptions about this book and it has at least two lies cranked into the introduction in the King James edition of the Bible. Look at the introduction preceding chapter 1. It says, ”THE REVELATION OF ST JOHN THE DIVINE”. Does anyone see two lies in that? Now read verse 1. It starts with, “The Revelation of Jesus Christ…” OK, we have exposed one lie; now for the other one. In the intro it calls John “…THE DIVINE”. Now I ask you to check Webster’s for the definition of divine and you will see that it pertains to the God realm. John was flesh and blood just like you and I.

Now on to meatier things. Most peoples’ perception of Revelation is that it is a book for the final months or possibly years leading up to the end of this age. But is that another false impression and myth? I’m here to tell you that it is covering a period of some 3000 years! (We are currently at about the 2000 year mark.) Note the last line in verse 3. “The time is at hand!” The things being described in that book were already happening at the time John was writing --- presumably around 90 AD. The white horse of religious deception (Rev 6) was already running at a full gallop. The fourth beast of Daniel 7 was already seated in power and was being witnessed by John as the total beast of Rev 13 and 17.

If you have an understanding of the book of Daniel, then you know who the four beasts are that are discussed in chapter 7. If you don’t, then I would advise you to start your homework immediately. Why? Because in chapter 12 of Daniel, the angel that brought Daniel that message divided the world of the end of the age into two camps --- the wise and the wicked. The wise were defined by the angel as those (living at the close of the age) who understood the book of Daniel even though Daniel himself did not understand it in his day. See verse 10.

When you have done your homework, you will come to understand that the fourth beast of Daniel 7 (which had ten horns) was the Roman Empire. When you read the book of Revelation, you will see in chapter 13 that John saw this same beast in vision and yes, it had ten horns, but John notes something else --- that it had 7 heads. You will see that one of those heads was “…wounded unto death…” (verse 3) but that the deadly wound was healed. This was in 476 AD when the Rome was overrun by the barbar-ians(?). The deadly wound was healed in 554 AD in what is called in history the “Imperial Restoration” by Justinian.

In verse 11 John is witnessing “…another beast coming up out of the earth…” with two horns like a lamb and he spoke as a dragon.” This was the papacy and you will notice in verse 12 that he had all the power of the first beast. “…horns like a lamb and spoke as a dragon…” Could there be a more succinct description of the inquisition? They pretended to be servants of God while murdering at will.

Going on in verse 14, we find that the second beast, “…deceives them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the (first) beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by the sword and did live.”
“And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast that the image of the beast should both speak and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.”

So when did this happen? Remember the Vatican navy that was called the Spanish Armada and was destroyed by weather when they sailed against England? Now the Vatican needed to replace that navy in order to counter the sea power of England. The jesuits needed a new challenge because they had been disbanded (on paper) and had to keep a low profile. The challenge was to create an “Image of the beast” that could fight Rome’s wars while the original beast (the Roman Empire) pulled the strings and faded into the shadows. Have you ever wondered why the mafia (the Vatican CIA) has always seemed above the law in America? Could it be because our Commander in Chief was taking his orders from the Vatican? In order to get the gory details of how the Vatican created the new nation of America, read “Rulers of Evil” by the late F Tupper Saussy. Suffice it to say we have our Caesar (only we call him president), we have our senate which is a carbon copy of the Roman senate and our rulers preside from capitolium which by Vatican definition must be temples dedicated to the pagan god Jupiter in order to qualify to be called a capitol. Has it occurred to anyone to wonder why we have an EMPIRE STATE BUILDING??? Indeed we are an image of the Roman Empire. The jesuits have spawned the legal system that has robbed and continues to rob America. Now even the doctors are beginning to use their methods.

Perhaps it should also be noted that the area now named Washington DC was named Rome for over a hundred years before being transferred to our nation for the capitol. Why wasn’t this included in our history books. To the victor go the spoils and the prerogative of editing history. It would make an interesting research project to see what kind of “considerations” were rendered for this piece of real estate.

Hopefully this will help to explain why God will destroy this nation and judging from Christ’s words in Matthew 24, it appears that it will be in this generation. Could the current bizarre weather be the beginning? For a better perspective on how it may occur, read Jeremiah 50-51 and Ezekiel 27.

Chapter 13

THE IMAGE OF THE BEAST

In the 17th chapter of Revelation is a cryptic verse about a beast that “…was and is not and yet is…” The setting is concerning a beast power (Yahweh compares mens’ governments to beasts) that is to rule the world in the last days of this age. In order to correct past erroneous concepts generated by Catholic myths, perhaps we should make it clear that the end of this present age is not the end of the world. If you look in Matthew 5, at the sermon on the mount, you will see that followers of Yahweh are promised the earth as an inheritance. Yes there are trying times coming and, yes, the earth will be a mess that has to be cleaned up but it isn’t going out in a giant fireball or a nuclear war. To be sure, there will be a nuclear war, but it will not leave the earth as an uninhabited and incinerated relic. It will be a confused and polluted mess attesting to 6,000 years of mens’ failures in their attempts to govern under the supervision of Satan. (See Luke 4.)

Many religionists would prefer that the book of Revelation be taken out of the Bible and their reasoning is that “Nobody understands it anyway, so what good is it?” Now the truth of the matter is that it scares hell out of people --- even those who consider themselves religious. The book of Revelation was presumably written by the apostle John in the twilight of his life, presumably 90-95 AD. He was imprisoned on the Isle of Patmos (a rock quarry) for his belief. He was shown a series of visions of what was to be happening on this planet right on down to the closing out of the age. These visions were given to him by one who identified Himself as, “I am Alpha and Omega (first and last letters in the Greek alphabet), the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is and which was and is to come, the Almighty.” (Revelation 1:8).

We must keep in mind that the apostle John had never seen an airplane, a tank, or even a firearm. War in those days was conducted at close range where you looked your enemy in the eye as you took off his head with a sword or ran him through with a javelin. We are talking about the first century AD when Rome was in its hey-day. It was a world power and there was no nation ready to challenge that. Something else we should keep in mind is that this prophecy was not merely to cover the final century of the present age but some twenty centuries that covered the time from John’s day right on down to the close-out of the age and the setting up of the Kingdom of Yahweh on earth. This prophecy was not be sealed as was the one given to Daniel for it says in chapter 1, verse 3, “…the time is at hand.” What “time” was at hand? The time of the fulfilling of these prophecies. The fourth beast, or world ruling kingdom, was already flexing it’s muscles, the apostasy and accompanying conspiracy had already begun and the earth was entering into the third 2,000 year phase of the 6,000 year plan.

Chapter 2 and 3 consist of messages to the churches in Asia at that time, and it would seem, to the “churches” all down through the ages until all envisioned in this book comes to pass. This would seem to be attested to by the fact that some of these churches were told to “Repent; or else I will come unto thee quickly…” To me that suggests that each of these seven churches will be existing right on down to the day of Christ’s return and the setting up of the Kingdom of Yahweh on earth. (We should perhaps keep in mind that the word for “church” in the King James Bible is translated [or substituted for] from the Greek word “ekklesia” and is referring to people ---called out ones--- and not a building nor an organization of men.) There is an incredible amount of information in this book, especially when you begin to study it and compare it with what the prophets of old wrote about the end times. Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Daniel, Hosea, Amos, etc. (The interested reader would do well to do a word study on the word “church” in order to better grasp the deception that has been cranked into even the King James Edition of the Bible.)

As mentioned before, Catholic myths have colored the spiritual vision of most Americans and the “Christian” world. Christianity is defined to the world by the Vatican even though there is not a connection, and never has been, between the Creator and the Vatican. The church founded by Christ (whose real name was Yashua Ha Maschiac) fled to the wilderness in 70 AD just before Jerusalem was destroyed by Titus’ armies. At that time the total number of followers of Yahweh in that area appears to have been 70. This group evidently was instructed supernaturally to leave Jerusalem before the final siege. The armies pulled back long enough for them to make their escape and they fled to Pella at the north end of the Dead Sea. Rome had no interest in pursuing this group because they didn’t see them as a threat at that time. By the time of Constantine, (4th century AD) they had become a threat and that is why Constantine (whom the religious world considers a great Christian reformer), felt compelled to outlaw the keeping of the Sabbath and the statutes which are considered to be Jewish holidays. It is interesting to note that, in the book of Daniel, there are four beasts described in chapter 7 and the fourth one was described as “…dreadful and terrible and strong exceedingly…” It goes on to say in verse 25 that this fourth beast would “…think to change times and laws…” Constantine was one of the heads of this beast --- and yes, he did “…think to change times (calendar) and laws…” (The reader would also do well to do a word study on the word “Christian” rather than proceed blindly assuming that it is taken from the root word “Christ”.)

It is interesting to note that the prophet Daniel was given a preview of our world today and he had a question for the one who gave him this. It is noted in Daniel 12, verses 8-10. Starting in verse 8, Daniel said, “And I heard but I understood not, then said I, ‘O my Lord, what shall be the end of these things?’” Verse 9 continues: “And He said, ‘Go thy way Daniel: for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end.’” Verse 10 is quite revealing: “Many shall be purified and made white and tried; but the wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand.” Is the angel saying that the world will be divided into only two camps at the end of the age --- the wicked and the wise? Does he then go on to say the wise are those who would understand the message given to Daniel --- even though Daniel didn’t understand it himself?

If you would seek to get your bearings in this world that seems like a movie we come into at half time, then the book of Daniel is a good place to start. Learn about the image of Nebuchadnezzar’s dream (chapter 2) and what the body parts represent. The dream is given and also the interpretation by Daniel. Learn who the four beasts (chapter 7) are and their place in history. Learn how the beasts of Daniel interface with the beasts of Revelation and you will be well on your way to understanding where we are in the stream of time that does have a close out point coming up in the not too distant future. I try not to use the fear tactics of modern religion --- “Christ could return tonight and where would you be?” Statements like that come from ignorance of the scriptures. Amos 3:7 says, “Surely the Lord God will do nothing but he reveals his secret unto his servants the prophets.” The only two prophets specifically mentioned in the last days of the age are the two in Revelation 11 and these are called the “Two Witnesses” and will be giving their last warning to the world for three and one half years before the final curtain is dropped on this society. Are they witnessing today? No they are not, because it says in Revelation 11 that they will be given “…power to shut heaven so that it rain not in the days of their prophecy.” If their prophecy is not ongoing now, then Christ is not returning tonight.

These two will be killed in Jerusalem but that is not to say that their entire last three and one half years will be spent there. It is interesting to note what Christ said about prophets in Luke 4:24: “Verily I say unto you, ‘No prophet is accepted in his own country…’” To me this suggests that even if they start in America, they will be thrown out and perhaps Israel will be the only country that will accept them. Then, even they (Israel) won’t be able to stand what the prophets are saying and will kill them in the streets of Jerusalem three and one half days before the last trumpet. This is exciting stuff --- especially since we are beginning to see “Apocalyptic” terms being used on CNN.

But what about this beast in Revelation that “…was and is not and yet is…” ? As before mentioned, if you do your homework in the book of Daniel, you will find four beasts mentioned in chapter 7 which represent four kingdoms --- world ruling kingdoms. Now the historians of the world who work for those with world ruling ambitions do not like to admit this because it undermines their agenda. However, in the second chapter of Daniel, you will find four world ruling kingdoms described and if you lay the straitedge of scripture alongside history as it then unfolded, you will be able to see quite clearly who these kingdoms are. The four beasts of Daniel 7 represent the same four kingdoms (and with possibly an end time interpretation as well) and you will notice that the fourth beast had ten horns. Now if we cut to Revelation 13, we find the apostle John, on the Isle of Patmos, witnessing a vision of a beast with ten horns. When you read the description, you will find that this one also is “…dreadful and terrible.” It should be because it appears to be the same as the fourth one seen by Daniel. The first one, in Daniel’s time, was Babylon as was the head of the image in Nebuchadnezzar’s dream (Daniel 2). The second one was the Medo-Persian Empire and was the arms and chest of Neb’s image. The third was Alexander and was represented by the belly and thighs of Neb’s image. Belly and thighs??? That means the division in the then ruling empire came in the days of the third empire --- huh? The fourth one evolved from the four generals that took over Alexander’s Empire at his premature death. (Daniel 8 gives some commentary on this beast). Two faded into obscurity but two survived to become the king of the south (Egypt and Ethiopia) and the king of the north (Syria and later the Roman Empire). Are these the two legs of Nebuchadnezzar’s dream? If so, it would seem that the ten toes would be half Muslim and half “Christian”. Have the “Prophecy Interpreters” of the world missed this? These kings are dealt with in considerable detail in the eleventh chapter of Daniel. The king of the north was the world ruling empire (although divided even in those days) in the days that the apostle John was imprisoned on Patmos and it had been the ruling empire for many years. Let’s see how it fits into John’s vision.

Rev 13:1 “And I stood upon the sand of the sea and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns and upon his horns ten crowns and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.”
2 “And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard and his feet were as the feet of a bear and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power and his seat and great authority.” (Rev 12:9 explains who the dragon is.)
3 “And I saw one of his heads, as it were, wounded to death and his deadly wound was healed and all the world wondered after the beast.”
4 “And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast and they worshipped the beast saying, ‘Who is like unto the beast? Who is able to make war with him?”
5 “And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months.”
6 “And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle and them that dwell in heaven.” (Papal infallibility, confessions, purgatory, etc.)
7 “And it was given unto him to make war with the saints and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds and tongues and nations.”
8 “And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.”
9 “If any man have an ear, let him hear.”
10 “He that leads into captivity shall go into captivity: he that kills with the sword must be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the saints.”
11 “And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth and he had two horns like a lamb and he spoke as a dragon.”
12 “And he exercises all the power of the first beast before him and causes the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.”
13 “And he doeth great wonders so that he makes fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men.”
14 “And deceives them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword and did live.”
15 “And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast that the image of the beast should both speak and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.”
16 “And he causes all both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:”
17 “And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark or the name of the beast or the number of his name.”
18 “Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred three-score and six.”

And that is the chapter in Revelation that strikes terror into the hearts of those raised on Catholic myths. Who has been raised on Catholic myths? The Catholic and Protestant world. So what are Catholic myths. These are religious platitudes and/or historical “facts” that we are to accept without question because they were expounded by some pope, priest or jesuit. Here are a few examples:

1. Peter was the first pope.
2. The church of Rome was the church founded by Christ.
3. Nicholas was a saint.
4. Constantine was a great Christian reformer.
5. Catholicism equals Christianity.
6. The cross is a Christian symbol.
7. The trinity.
8. America is/was a Biblically founded nation.
9. Mary died a virgin.
10. Mary is in heaven today.
11. Immortality of the soul.
12. Columbus discovered America.
13 An ever burning hell.

Now if you can accept all these without question then you are ready for “mainstream Christianity” and reading the rest of this communiqué would be a waste of time.

If, however, you see reason to question even part of these, you may be able to accept what I am about to say and put it to the test by proving or disproving it. Many hard and cold facts have been withheld from the general public because it is much easier to rule ignorant slaves than those with a measure of discernment. One of these facts is the ownership of the world bank. This myth was exploded by the late F Tupper Saussy in his book “Rulers of Evil”.

Saussy points out, in a scholarly fashion, that America is a creation of the Vatican! They needed a power that could counter England on the high seas and especially so after the destruction of the Spanish Armada which was the Vatican navy. Now, the first question that came to my mind was, “Why would God use the Vatican to do anything?” But then I had to pause and consider that God used Assyria as his whip when Israel, after a miraculous delivery from Egypt, rebelled and went off into idolatry. Shalmaneser was used because he had the resources and the armies to handle the problem --- and handle it he did. So was Shalmaneser a Godly king? No! He was vicious! But he handled the problem and put the nation of Israel in slavery.

Then the nation of Judah followed suite and went into idolatry also and God used another worldly king named Nebuchadnezzar to go in and butcher them and lead the residue into Babylon as slaves. So was Ol’ Neb a Godly man? No! He too was vicious! But he had the resources and the armies and he handled the job.

So why would God use the Vatican to achieve His purpose? Because as owners of the world bank, they had the resources and the connections and armies of jesuits that had become unemployed (after the inquisition) and needed a challenge.

Now if you go back to the chapter 13 of Revelation quoted above and read verse 14, you will see that the second beast seen by John, coming up out of the earth, “… deceives them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword and did live.” So who was this original beast and when did it receive a wound “by the sword”? (warfare) As covered earlier, the fourth beast of Daniel and the total beast of John appear to be one and the same and is the Roman Empire. It was dealt a death blow by those called “Barbarians” (in Roman censored history), in 476 AD. When was the wound healed? In 554 AD in what has been termed in history the “Imperial Restoration”. (Editor’s note: It is important to understand that the Roman Empire did not cease to exist at this time. The capitol had been moved to Byzantium more than a hundred years before. A brief research on “Byzantine Empire” will reveal quite clearly that it is a contin-uation of the Roman Empire.) And what is this “Image of the Beast” that they convinced those on earth to build? It was America, named after the leading jesuit whose name was Americ. It had a Caesar (who was called now a president). It had a senate (which was a carbon copy of the old Roman Senate) and Capitolium from where their rulers presided. By Catholic definition, an edifice must first be dedicated to the pagan god Jupiter before it qualifies to be called a capitol. Moreover, Tupper Saussy points out that Washington DC was named “Rome” for over a hundred years before it was transformed into the “capitol” of federal corporate America. Are we the image of the beast? Have we been fighting Rome’s wars? Are we ruled from the Vatican and from the “Society of Jesus” which is the most corrupt organization ever devised by Satan and administered by men --- if they can be called men. And are they the direct overseers of American courts today? Could this be why justice seems so foreign to our courts?

Have you ever wondered why the mafia always seemed above the law in America? Could it be because they are the Vatican CIA? So with jesuitic foxes in charge of the American henhouse, it seemed they could always find a way of slipping through the net.

Verse 15 of Revelation 13 says about this image:
“And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast that the image of the beast should both speak and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.”

Was this image of the beast fulfilling its commission at Waco, Texas, when the Branch Davidians were massacred? Was Ruby Ridge another display to demonstrate that it is futile to try to challenge the image of the beast? Just in case you missed the thread of commonality between Ruby Ridge and Waco (which CNN neglected to tell us), it was that both groups were keepers of the Sabbath sanctified by God and given to Adam the first week of his life. Were these two events nothing less than the image of the beast eradicating worshippers of God and making it into entertainment for the masses in the “Arena” of television? Were they non-threatening training missions for the BATF to enjoy spilling a little blood without putting themselves in any danger? Was it Coliseum Entertainment piped into our homes?

What was this power to give life? Money! Resources! God still uses those with resources to fulfill His purpose! Can we comprehend it?

So --- can we nail down just who this beast is that has “…the number of a man?” That appears to be one of the best guarded secrets of these end times. Many “would be” prophets have had a go at identifying that man and it would seem that all have come up with egg on their faces. One self appointed evangelist was convinced that Bill Clinton is the man identified as the beast and went so far as to predict to his inner circle that Bill Clinton would be the eighth Secretary General of the UN, which, in his view, was the fulfillment of Rev 17:11. We now have a Korean as the eighth UN Secretary General. Perhaps we should look at Revelation 17:11 to see what it does say. “And the beast that was and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goes into perdition.” So what does this mean? Well, if we drop back to verse 10, it reads like this: “And there are seven kings, five are fallen, and one is and the other is not yet come; and when he comes, he must continue a short space.” Does this say anything about the UN? Well, no. But those who appoint themselves as prophets make assumptions at times and read more into prophecy that what the Bible says. Verse 10 says that there are seven kings and five are fallen. Verse 11 goes on to say that, “…the beast that was and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven…” To me this would suggest that there is to be an eighth king after the seven and that the eighth is either one of the seven or of their offspring. Please understand that I am not saying that it won’t be Bill Clinton --- I’m only saying that he did not make the grade as the eighth secretary general of the U.N.

The beast we are speaking of has seven heads and ten horns as was noted in the 13th chapter of Revelation quoted above. Perhaps we should look at yet another beast that has seven heads and ten horns. If we go to Revelation 12:3, we read: “And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns and seven crowns upon his heads.” So Satan himself is depicted as a beast with seven heads and ten horns --- isn’t that interesting? But the beast of Revelation 13:1 rose up out of the sea. I suppose we could call him a ‘chip off the old block’. (See Rev 17:15 for who these waters are.)

The “other beast” (verse 11) of Revelation 13 was seen coming up out of the earth. It only had two horns “…like a lamb and he spoke as a dragon.” Evidently this one that came up out of the earth doctored the first beast and helped him to recover from his deadly wound by a sword. Now the beast of 13:11 persuaded the world of that time that they should “make an image” to the first beast John saw and then the “other beast” proceeded to pump life into that image (verse 15).

Before proceeding, let’s review what we have covered up to this point.

1. One who claimed to have the power to bring it to pass laid out history, before it happened, to the prophet Daniel, and told him there would be four world ruling kingdoms of which the one Daniel was living in was the first. This was in a dream of Nebuchadnezzar (Daniel 2) which was revealed to Daniel and then later a vision given to Daniel of four beasts (Daniel 7) in order to confirm the interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar’s dream.

2. Some 5-600 years (and three kingdoms) later, the apostle John was given a vision of the number four beast of Daniel’s vision. Too many of the details of both beasts matched up to think otherwise. And each of these beasts was to represent a world ruling empire. If this be true, then the fourth world ruling empire has been in power for the past 2,000+ years! Can this be? Haven’t we, America, fought two world wars to make the world safe for democracy? Ah yes, and who financed both sides of those wars and therefore could not only determine the winner but could turn a handsome profit? Who had that kind of money, power, resources? The world bank! Owned by the Vatican! Were we fighting Rome’s wars? Were the strings of this puppet regime being manipulated from the Vatican? Information coming to light in these last days would seem, not only to indicate that, but to scream that to those of the world that have ears to hear.

3. Next we have a number of beasts seen by John sometime around the end of the first century AD. The first one was seen in vision by John in heaven and it had seven heads and ten horns. This appears to have been Satan himself (Revelation 12:3). Next, John saw a beast rise up out of the sea which also had seven heads and ten horns. One of the heads was wounded as if unto death but the wound healed and the “…world wondered after the beast.” (Revelation 13:3) What appears to be the same beast is mentioned again in chapter 17 of Revelation, verse 3. I say it appears to be the same because this beast also has seven heads and ten horns. Verse 9 says, “And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains…” Verses 35 and 44 of Daniel chapter 2 show us that a mountain represents a kingdom (or empire --- has it occurred to anyone to wonder why America has an EMPIRE STATE BUILDING?). This is corroborated in Amos 4:1 and 6:1 where the kingdom of Samaria is referred to as the mountain of Samaria. The seven heads of the fourth beast of Daniel, which presumably is the beast John is witnessing, are seven mountains (kingdoms) “…on which the woman (the great whore) sits.” John addressed his second epistle (letter) to the church calling her the “elect lady”, II John, verse 1. Therefore, if he addressed the church (ekklesia) as the elect lady, where does this place a whore? A false church? And one that “…sits upon many waters”?

Revelation 17:1 The waters are defined in verse 15 as “…peoples and multitudes and nations and tongues.” Is there such a false church today? Ruling over peoples, multitudes, nations and tongues? (There is a growing mountain of evidence to indicate that any group calling themselves a church today is a “false church”. With all the deception in the world today, there has never been a time when the admonition “prove all things” was more pregnant with meaning. Check out the origin of the word “church” --- hint: use an old unabridged dictionary.)

4. Time marches on and Rome received a deadly wound by the “barbarians” in 476 AD. However, just 78 years later the wound was healed in what historians call the “Imperial Restoration” by Justinian. That wound was healed by a power group forming up in those days that came to be known as the “papacy”. Revelation refers to it as, “…another beast” that came up out of the earth and had two horns (Rev 13:11). This “other beast” “…exercised all the power of the first beast and caused the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast.”(verse 12). It was after this that the “…image to the beast which had the wound by a sword…” was set up. (Verse 14). And now that image had the power “…to cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.” (verse 15).

Are we beginning to clear away some of the smoke? Can we begin to see where we are in the stream of time? Can we begin to see through the mists of deception thrown up by the Vatican and her puppet which is America? Can we admit that we have been raised with myths substituted for knowledge? What shall we do about it?

We have all read in the book of Judges about the destruction of Jericho by Joshua under instructions of God. Have you also noted that only one family of Jericho was spared? That was the family of Rahab the harlot. Now the promoters of the King James version of the Bible have tried to soften the term “harlot” for our sensitive ears and say that it also meant “inn keeper”. If you do your own research, you will see that doesn’t wash. So why would God spare a harlot??? Could it be to show the world that God is no respecter of persons? Could it be that she was the only one in Jericho that did her homework as to who the Israelites were? Did she question the travelling merchants of the caravans of those days for years to learn what she could about this hoarde of sand dwellers moving across the country? Did she duly note the occurrence of the opening of the Red Sea and the destruction of the Egyptian Army? Did she follow the battles with the Amalekites and their progress as they approached the crossing of the Jordan which put them on the doorstep of Jericho? Did she question witnesses that saw the Jordan open to allow passage of all Israel? Now let’s pose a question you may have never considered: Do you suppose that during Jericho’s last week of survival, (which was during the days of unleavened bread), that Rahab was daily pledging her allegiance to the flag of Jericho? Think this over carefully in this age when we see flags of America on every street corner and are urged to pledge our allegiance to them. Should we be pledging our allegiance to a nation God has already “…weighed in the balances and found wanting”…?

Chapter 14

WORSHIPPING THE IMAGE OF THE BEAST

In ancient Rome sports teams were identified by colors. They were known as the blue, the green, the red, etc. Sports teams in Ireland are identified this way today and their fans (fanatics) attend the events with the same Roman fervor.

In ancient Rome the sporting events were government sponsored and attendance was an act of worship. You see all governments of men covet the worship of their constituency. Once they attain sufficient power, they demand it. Rome was/is such a government.

When we make a conscious decision to take charge of our life and begin to try to get our bearings in this seeming movie that we came into at half time, we find it very confusing. People before us have already made many of our decisions for us. The vast majority of people assume that those who made those decisions knew what they were doing and that those were made for our benefit and for our protection. When we begin to check it out, we find that isn’t true at all and that those decisions were made for very selfish motives and to support a house of cards which we find ourselves in today.

I am not a follower of Muhammad, however, he, like us, found himself smack in the middle of just such a world and began to try to unravel the myths he had been given to work with in order to get his bearings and make decisions based on reality rather than myth. The point I want to get across is this: Muhammad had a great respect for the Jewish people and told his followers that the Jews were a wise and discerning people because they had a book through which they passed their wisdom, knowledge and discernment down from generation to generation. So he began a book of his own, presumably to pass on knowledge and wisdom to future generations. That book is called the Koran or Quran. This, of course, was two millennia behind the tribes of Israel or what Muhammad perceived as “the Jews”. You see, Muhammad was also a victim of the deception which engulfs the whole world. (See Rev 12:9). His starting of the Muslim religion was a protest to the excesses he saw in the Catholic Church, which, even at that time, were trying to get the world to see them as “Christians”.

We still have today that book the Jews used to pass on their acquired knowledge and wisdom but more and more evidence of tampering surfaces yearly and it would seem it is being replaced with myth and pseudo-science. The book is the Bible and while it still is a top seller, it appears to be sold more as a talisman than as a means of upgrading our education and acquiring wisdom and knowledge. It isn’t that the knowledge and wisdom are no longer there (although it has been tampered with) but rather that people have been infused with a mythology called “situation ethics” and have come to believe that the Bible is an outdated book. Perhaps this is why the apostle Paul commended his student Timothy for “…rightly dividing truth.”

Let’s just take a “for instance” to see if we can get a glimpse into some of the mysteries contained in this book. Have you ever noticed how those with scant scriptural knowledge will pose a question, in a discussion of the Bible, which they seem to think will make them look wise and end all discussion. That question is: “Who made God?” They seem to feel there is no answer to that question --- but wait --- is this wisdom speaking or ignorance? Let’s just look at one verse in the book of Isaiah. Chapter 45, verse 11. “Thus saith the LORD, the Holy One of Israel, and his Maker…” Ah, yes, and that is a capital M. So you see, the Creator has even addressed this question and has answered it in the pages of the Bible. We really need to take a serious look at this book the world has rejected if we would get a handle on life and how to live it.

This communiqué is not written to or for those who order their lives according to opinion polls, the latest fashion trends or what the Joneses might think. It is written rather for those who can think for themselves. For people who have the vision to see the conspiracies at work in this world’s societies/ governments/ religions/business and economics. People who have the vision to see the end result of a nation or world governed by the whims of lawyers. Vision to see the image of the beast that was created some 230 years ago. (See Rev 13:11-15) Vision to see that a nation or world that protects fools from themselves is destined to become a nation or world of fools. This is written to those addressed in Daniel 12:10, where it says “…but the wise shall understand.”

The image of the beast that was created is America and it is a carbon copy of the Roman beast which was the fourth beast of Daniel 7 and the total beast of John’s vision recorded in the book of Revelation. We have our Caesar (only we call him president). We have a senate which is a carbon copy of the ancient Roman senate and we have the capitolium from where our president and governors rule.

This is written to bring to the attention of those who can understand what the worship of the beast consists of. Rome worshipped at the arena or at the sports events sponsored by the government. Their allegiance was to colors. It kept the populace occupied and therefore out of the affairs of those in government. (Don’t Americans pledge their allegiance to “colors”?) Rulers were elected by which one could produce the most blood and gore. Really now, is this so much different than America today. We pipe the blood and gore into virtually all American homes via TV. We call it a victimless crime but is it really? What’s wrong with this picture? Perhaps we should turn the question around and ask, “What’s right with this picture?” And of course, the answer is “nothing”! We have movie producers making tons of money and subverting an entire nation. We have the most corrupt organization ever conceived by Satan and administered by men overseeing this corruption and that is the Society of Jesus organized by Ignatius Loyola for the purpose of exterminating worshippers of the Creator back in the 16th century. It is still very active today and is the command center for the American Government.

Perhaps we should focus on a part of God’s word that I seldom (or never) hear quoted, and that is in the first chapter of Romans. This, no doubt, is written for those who are convinced that Yahweh isn’t watching. Perhaps this is written to the soap opera fans --- those whose interest is in sex triangles. Verse 26 begins: “For this cause God gave them up to vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:”
27 “And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.”
28 “And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;”
29 “Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,”
30 “Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,”
31 “Without understanding, covenant breakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful;”
32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.”

Am I reading this right, that “…those who have pleasure in them that do them” are “worthy of death” also? Isn’t the sale and promotion of this voyeurism the stock in trade of soap operas and trashy novels?

When we are persuaded by our managed media to choose a “flag color” in our essentially one party system --- whether we call it demopublicans or republicrats --- are we then involved in worshipping the image of the beast? Are our amphitheaters and football stadiums dedicated to the worship of the image of the beast? Worship means devote time to, right? When we vote in contrived elections with both parties being provided by the image of the beast and pre-educated into the U.N. agenda by the CFR, are we playing their games and thereby “worshipping the image of the beast”?

Can we begin to see how the universal deception mentioned in Revelation 12:9 has been passed on to the world? Through religion. Through the corruption of history. Through the control of the world bank and therefore the control of the outcome of wars. Through the censorship of educational material from kindergarten through college and through the development of institutions to support the smoke and mirrors of those who, under the tutelage of Satan the devil, rule the world we live in.

History would have us believe that King David’s throne ended with Zedekiah. If this be so then God lied when He told David his throne would last forever.

History would have us believe that the Roman Empire ended in 476 AD and nothing could be further from the truth. Rome did receive a deadly wound. But Rome was not the capitol of the Roman Empire at that time! The capitol was officially moved by Constantine more than a hundred years before to Byzantium and the name was changed to Constantinople. If you do research on the Byzantine Empire you will see that they openly admit that it is the Roman Empire. This second beast exercised all the power of the first and the first, it would seem, decided that ruling from the shadows was the way to go and therefore never regained the world spotlight. The second beast then persuaded “…them that to dwell on the earth…” (Rev 13:14) to “… make an image to the beast that had the wound by the sword and did live.” (same verse).

History taught us that this creation was merely “… huddled masses yearning to breathe free…” Huh? Do “huddled masses” create nations? No! God makes and unmakes nations and he does it through men, nations or organi-zations with means. Who did He use to punish Israel of old when they fell hopelessly into idolatry? Sennacherib of Assyria. Why? Because he had the means and the armies. Who did He use to punish Judah when they followed in the footsteps of Israel? Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon. Were either of these men “Godly men”? No --- of course not. They were vicious. But they had the means and they did the job.

So where does that leave us today? Revelation 18 talks of a new Babylon in the last days that is to be destroyed by God. Jeremiah 50 and 51 goes into some detail concerning this destruction. Is it coincidental that New Yorkers refer to their city as “Babylon on the Hudson”? Has America already been judged by God and are we now simply waiting for the axe to fall? Our sacrifices to Molech have exceeded all those who have preceded us. Our crime statistics are certainly not something to crow about. Our nation has been raped and robbed through our phoney money, politicians, bankers and lawyers. Our religionists have been muted through 501-C3 exemptions. Our country has been officially bankrupt since the ‘30s and yet precious few Americans even realize it. Even the name of God has been taken out of our classrooms although profanity and sexual perversion are condoned and taught. Are we about to be destroyed as a nation by God Himself through the powers at His disposal? Are we the Image of the Beast? Have we already been judged and found wanting?

As we close out the age, we need to become increasingly aware of these things. May God help us to understand and learn to love the truth.