COMMENTARY & OPINION

From the

desk of

Bill Ramey

1/24/17

COMMENTARY & OPINION

January 26, 2017

Pope Orders Knights Of Malta Destroyed For Loyalty To Trump After CIA Spies Arrested In Russia

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

In what can only be described as one of the most significant historical events to occur in over 700 years (since 1305) when Pope Clement V ordered the annihilation of the Knights Templar, a new Security Council (SC) report circulating in the Kremlin today states that Pope Francis has, likewise, order the total and complete destruction of the Order of Malta (Knights of Malta) just hours after the Federal Security Service (FSB) formally announced that it had captured and arrested for treason two US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) linked spies, who under the co-direction of the CIA and Vatican, created the “Russia won the election” myth to discredit the legitimacy of Freemason leader President Donald Trump.  [Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]

According to this report (and as we’ve previously reported on), this full-blown “civil war” between the two oldest and most prominent sovereign entities in the Western World has left the international legitimacy of the Knights of Malta in ruins with its constitutional integrity and diplomatic standing now seemingly beyond repair—and that was caused by the Knights of Malta secretly supporting Freemason leader Trump, including their “spiritual anointment” of this new US president during his 20 January inauguration by the American Knights of Malta leader Cardinal Timothy Dolan.

With Pope Francis ordering the Knights of Malta to expel all Freemasons from their ranks for their having supported Trump, this report continues, the Knights of Malta fired back at the Pontiff in what is described as an “extraordinary rebuke” ordering the Vatican to stay out of it affairs—and to which Pope Francis then responded to by firing the international Knights of Malta leader Grand Master Fra’ Matthew Festing.

Angering the Knights of Malta against Pope Francis, this report explains, was the Vatican being complicit with the CIA in the arrest of two Freemason spies who uncovered the many links between Hillary Clinton, George Soros and other globalist factions seeking to destroy Freemason leader Trump.

Though these two Freemason spies arrested in Italy under the direction of the Vatican and CIA are now in “black custody”, this report notes, immediately prior to their being captured they were able to electronically transmit information they had obtained on the plot to destroy Freemason leader Trump to the Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR)—who in turn joined with the FSB and created an intelligence operation that captured the CIA causing the 13 January cyber attack on Washington D.C. that they intended to blame on Russia. 

Along with this joint SVR-FSB intelligence operation uncovering the CIA plot to launch a cyber attack upon their own nation, this report continues, it also unmasked two CIA paid operatives who were, also, working on this plot to destroy Freemason leader Trump by the creation of the “Russia won the US  election” myth--Ruslan Stoyanov, the head of Kaspersky Lab's investigations unit, and Sergei Mikhailov, a division head of the FSB, both of whom are now under arrest and charged with committing the grave crime of treason against the Federation.

Want to know more? Click HERE.

 Upon Pope Francis learning that two of his CIA-Vatican spies were arrested in Moscow, this report says, his “demonic anger” became so great he ordered the destruction of Knights of Malta for their supporting of Freemason leader Trump—and thus causing other high ranking Catholic Church officials to warn the Pontiff that: “If the Holy See can so brazenly insert itself into the internal governance of another sovereign entity whose legitimacy stems from a mutual agreement under international law, it now has no legal defence should another sovereign body, say the government of the Italian Republic, choose to view the independence of the Holy See as a similarly anachronistic formality.”

Most critical to note about this historic “civil war”, this report explains, is that it has pitted the “demonic Anti-Christ globalist forces” led by Pope Francis against the Freemasonic “nation state” forces led by President Donald Trump, and whose combined Knights Templar-Freemasonic “alliance master plan” is to retake control of America, and hence the world, by 24 June 2017—which is the 300^th year founding of the Freemasonic Lodge in London that not only created the United States during the American Revolution, but, also, destroyed France’s monarchy during French Revolution too.  

Aiding Freemason leader President Trump in his forces bid to retake control of America, this report continues, is the United Kingdom—whose citizens are still in shock after the CIA released a stunning list prior to the US presidential election of over 2 million secret Freemason members in Britain showing how they have totally controlled that nation since, at least, 1733.

So powerful, in fact, have the Freemasonic forces in Britain become, this report notes, they masterminded their nations exit from the European Union (Brexit) just prior to Trump becoming president in a bid to join Freemason forces in UK with those in the US—and that Prime Minister Theresa May officially began today by her stunningly publishing the bill allowing her government to trigger Article 50 (the formal process for leaving the EU), and just hours before she meets with President Trump. 

 

Also to note, this report says, is that Freemason leader President Trump prior to his meeting with Prime Minister May has launched another attack against Pope Francis by telling the Vatican globalist supporting Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto that unless his Catholic nation pays for the border wall, Trump will refuse to meet him.

With Freemason leader President Trump using his new alliance with Prime Minister May to further drive a wedge into a fractured Europe, this report continues, Security Council intelligence analysts are agreeing with US experts saying that the Trump-May “combination of power” is beginning to resemble that of the 1980’s alliance between President Ronald Reagan and Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher.

 

The most critical aspect of the Freemasonic forces led by Reagan-Thatcher to be noted, this report explains, was the combining of their forces to stop the CIA globalist-led plot allowing Argentina to invade the sovereign British territory called the Falkland Islands and imprison then relocate all their UK citizens to Scotland—but that President Reagan ordered the US military to stop, including his secret agreement with Britain to loan them a powerful American warship if their aircraft carrier was lost during the war.  

Unlike in Europe, especially France, where Freemasons forces are feared, this report concludes, in American today this nations citizens have absolutely no idea of this historic war going on all around them—but that cannot be said of their ancestors, who in 1828 formed the Anti-Masonic Party to stop them from taking power, but who just a year later, in 1829, were totally defeated by Freemason forces loyal to America’s First Grand-Master President Andrew Jackson—and whose portrait Freemason leader President Trump ordered immediately installed in the White House Oval Office upon his taking power. 

January 26, 2017 © EU and US all rights reserved.  Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked back to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.

 [Note: The WhatDoesItMean.com website was created for and donated to the Sisters of Sorcha Faal in 2003 by a small group of American computer experts led by the late global technology guru Wayne Green (1922-2013) to counter the propaganda being used by the West to promote their illegal 2003 invasion of Iraq.]

Ramey comment:

The vision of the Vatican being destroyed by fire (Rev 17), comes into much better focus --- huh?

COMMENTARY & OPINION - Robert F Kennedy

From the

desk of

Bill Ramey

 1/24/17

COMMENTARY & OPINION

Robert F Kennedy’s devastating quotes on vaccines and the CDC

Thursday, January 26, 2017 7:05

(Before It's News)

Boom—how and why the CDC can foist toxic vaccines on the American people

By Jon Rappoport

From Kennedy’s video presentation, “7 Minutes on the CDC,” Anne Dachel (Age of Autism) has transcribed excerpts. This is explosive material, particularly because there is a chance Kennedy will head up an investigation of vaccine safety under Trump.

Kennedy understands the inherent conflict of interest at the CDC, which operates as a vaccine sales and marketing company, while at the same time posing as a neutral scientific body that assesses vaccine safety—AND OF COURSE, THE CDC PRESENTS AN EVER-EXPANDING SCHEDULE OF “NECESSARY” VACCINES TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

Think of it: the CDC has the power—backed by federal and state governments, and supported by the fake-news media—to buy and sell vaccines, while deciding how many vaccines the population should submit to. What salesman wouldn’t want to work for an outfit like that?

Here are Kennedy’s remarks. Read them, study them, and learn the truth:

“The CDC is a very troubled agency, and it’s not just me saying that. There have been four separate, intensive federal investigations by the United States Congress—a three year investigation, 2001, 2002, 2003, by the United States Senate, Tom Coburn’s committee, by the Inspector General of HHS in 2008, by the Office Integrity in 2014. All of them have painted the CDC as a cesspool of corruption, of an agency that has become an absolute subsidiary of the pharmaceutical industry, and that has become a sock puppet, a spokesperson, a shill for the industry.”

“CDC is not an independent agency. It is a vaccine company. CDC owns over twenty vaccine patents. It sells about $4.6 billion of vaccines every year. And its primary metric for success in all the departments in the agency are vaccine sales. The groups, for example the Immunization Safety Office, where the scientists who are supposed to be looking at efficacy and safety in vaccines, they are no longer a public service…agency. They are subsumed in that metric: We have to sell as many of these things as possible. And so they do things to their science to make sure that nothing interferes—no information—interferes with sales.

“Now there are two divisions of the vaccine branch where we worry about the corruption. The first one is called the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. That is the committee that makes the decision about what new vaccines to add to the schedule.”

“When I was a boy, I got three vaccines. My children got sixty-nine vaccines. It changed in 1989.”

“Why did it change in 1989?”

“Because in 1986, Congress, [was] drowning in pharmaceutical industry money—pharma puts more money into lobbying than any other industry—Pharmaceutical companies have more lobbyists on Capitol Hill than there are Congress people.”

“Do you think oil and gas has big influence in the Capitol? Well, that’s the next biggest. The pharmaceutical industry puts twice into lobbying, double the amount that the oil and gas, and four times what defense and aero space put in. So they control Congress.”

“In 1986, Congress passed the Vaccine Act, and there were good reasons for them to pass it. …At that time vaccine companies were being sued and were threatening to stop making vaccines. [Congress] said, okay, we’re going to insulate them from lawsuits. They made it illegal to sue a vaccine company in this country, no matter how reckless the behavior, no matter how negligent, no matter how toxic the product, no matter how grievous the injury to the child, you cannot sue.”

“You know how badly the pharmaceutical industry behaves when they are being sued, when there’s a whole bar of lawyers who spend their whole life looking for ways to sue the pharmaceutical industry and tell these stories to juries, and how many billions every year are won from that industry.”

“What do you think would happen if all of a sudden, all the lawyers disappeared, all the class action suits, all the multi district litigation, all the depositions, all the document searches, the discovery? Just gone. Nobody can sue. You can make anything you want.”

“And then they made it so that it was much easier to get a vaccine on the schedule than it was to get a pharmaceutical into the market. There’s no double blind placebo studies. They’re all fast tracked into the market place.”

“The decision is made by this group, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. And you’d hope that the people who would serve on that committee would be kind of nerdy scientists who are narrowly focused on public health outcomes, but that’s not who they are. The people who serve on that committee, almost all of them, have strong financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry.”

“I’ll give you an example of how this committee works. In 1999, Paul Offit sat on that committee. And when you go to this committee, when you go to their meetings, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices is in one room, and then there’s a press deck in the next room. You have a whole bunch of seats there with guys who look like me, in suits. They’re Wall Street analysts, pharmaceutical analysts. They’re waiting to hear the decision. And as soon as they come out and announce which new vaccines they put on the schedule, those guys run out in the hallway and get on their cell phones, and you can watch the stocks spike. So it’s become an economic enterprise.”

“Paul Offit sat on the committee in 1999 that added the rota virus vaccine to the schedule. He owned a patent to a rota virus vaccine. He was then able to sell his vaccine to Merck for $186 million. He pocketed something around $29 million. He’s never allowed anybody to ask him exactly how much, but according to the formula that they use, he would have gotten at least $29 million.”

“That caused a little bit of a scandal in Washington, and the Inspector General of HHS was sent to investigate it. They did a complete investigation of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, and what they found, what they concluded was what he did was not illegal under CDC rules. Sixty-four percent of the people who sat on that committee had conflicts that were similar to Paul Offit, and ninety-seven percent might have conflicts because the rest of them never made out their conflict of interest forms. And nobody ever made them do it.”

“It’s very difficult when those kinds of shenanigans are going on. The American people have faith that all of these new vaccines that were added, beginning in 1989, are put there solely because this committee is concerned with public health.”

Got it? This is four years’ worth of university political-science curriculum in seven minutes. Well, the actual title is politicized science.

Every American who can read should read it.

This is what is really going on at America’s number-one public health agency—the agency that is also a corporation.

This is war against the American people from within.

Filed under: Uncategorized Jon Rappoport has worked as a free-lance investigative reporter for over 30 years. http://nomorefakenews.com/

Ramey comment:

WOW!  THE DONALD IS, NOT ONLY DERAILING THE GRAVY TRAIN --- HE'S RIPPING OUT THE RAILS!  THIS ARTICLE SHOULD GO VIRAL.

SEE WHO'S FIGHTING HIM IN THE NEXT ARTICLE.

Republican traitor Paul Ryan now trying to protect Big Pharma from Trump’s monopoly-dismantling reforms

Tuesday, January 24, 2017 by: JD Heyes
Tags: Big Pharma, health reforms, Paul Ryan, President Donald Trump, price bidding

10KViews

(Natural News) Though on the surface it may seem like President Donald Trump has it good, politically: He’s a GOP president at a time when he’s also got a Republican majority in Congress. And while Democrats will always be Trump’s biggest political obstructionists, he’s going to get far too much pushback from establishment Republicans who still don’t understand they were given clear mandates by the American people to get certain things done.

One of those things involves dramatically reforming health care—and not like President Obama and  the Democrats “reformed” it when they ruled Congress and the White House, a la Obamacare. It’s obvious that some Republican leaders don’t get this, and one of them may be House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis.

Ryan, for some reason, appears to be picking a fight with Trump and Vice President Mike Pence over the administration’s pledge to tackle the corruption of Big Pharma. Every American adult who has had to pay for medications over the last several years knows that they have gone up in price dramatically, and that there seems to be nothing stopping drug makers from boosting prices even on drugs that have been around for a long time. (RELATED: Stay up to date with the Trump administration at WhiteHouse.news)

What’s more, the price increases are only going to get worse this year, as Trump predicted.

In his first press conference in recent days, Trump—speaking at Trump Tower in New York City—promised pharmaceutical industry reforms including proper bidding on prices, among other measures, moving forward, Breitbart reported.

“We have to get our drug industry coming back,” he said. “Our drug industry has been disastrous. They’re leaving left and right. They supply our drugs but they don’t make them here, to a large extent. And the other thing we have to do is create new bidding procedures for the drug industry, because they’re getting away with murder. Pharma has a lot of lobbies, a lot of lobbyists, a lot of power.”

He went on to note that currently, there is very little bidding going on regarding drugs, even though Americans and the U.S. government are the largest consumers of pharmaceutical drugs.

“We’re going to start bidding,” said Trump. “We’re going to save billions of dollars over a period of time.”

Trump doubled down on his criticisms of Big Pharma later, in an interview with the Washington Post, saying that Big Pharma was “politically protected, but not anymore.”

According to Fortune, Trump’s comments sent the pharmaceutical industry into a financial tailspin. Enter the donor class’ favorite House Speaker, Ryan.

In response, Ryan told Mike Allen of Axios that he wants to “have more conversations about” the president’s efforts to crack down on Big Pharma corruption before it actually happens.

For the record, according to money-in-politics watchdog MapLight, the “Pharmaceuticals/Health Products” industries are one of the top 10 donors to Ryan, contributing $381,979 through June 30, 2016.

“I believe that the current premium support system with Part D works extremely well,” Ryan said. “I think there’s some real success stories … and I think we need to tell that story.”

When Allen asked if that also meant telling the president such stories, Ryan replied that it needs to be told to “a lot of people.”

He added: “I think [incoming Health and Human Services Secretary] Tom Price understands this issue extremely well.”

When he was asked about Trump’s comments that Big Pharma was politically protected, “but not anymore,” Ryan replied, “I don’t speak like that, generally speaking. I’m always looking for win-win situations, and I believe there’s a lot more we can do to bring down the price of drugs.” (RELATED: Stay current on this and other issues dealing with the pharmaceutical industry at BigPharmaNews.com)

The tension is more of the kind we’ve seen since the nationalist/populist Trump—the first real president “for all the people” in several generations who wants to stand up to the globalists, crony capitalists and corporatists—began rubbing up against the elitists who ‘run things.’

The Washington political class has never had to deal with anyone like Trump as president. He is not one of them, so he doesn’t view issues and problems through the same politically compromised prism as they do. Trump’s idea of “win-win” isn’t a “bipartisan agreement” per se, it’s any deal that helps as many Americans as possible (especially those who, up to now, have not had a voice in D.C.) while saving the government money and making it more efficient.

The ruling elite see “win-win” as anything that makes it appear as though they’re ‘doing something for the people,’ while actually doing something for the donors who keep them in power.

Big difference.

J.D. Heyes is a senior writer for Natural News and News Target, as well as editor of The National Sentinel.