COMMENTARY & OPINION

From the desk of

Bill Ramey

4/7/17

COMMENTARY & OPINION

Donald Trump Has Just Committed the United States to a Disastrous War in Syria

Friday, April 7, 2017 13:06

(Before It's News)

Has anything good truly arisen from our involvement in the Middle East? Has the American public benefited at all from these wars, save for the globalist elite? America was officially at war throughout all 8 years of his presidency, a first, but he managed to resist putting official boots on the ground in Syria, another no-win situation for the US. But now it looks like President Trump may have different ideas.

In the following video, Right Wing News looks at Trump’s rhetoric toward Syria, and its implications for US foreign policy. Trump has previously criticized Obama’s lack of commitment toward solving the Syrian problem, and more recently UN ambassador Nikki Haley said that if the UN Security Council failed to act, that the US would be “compelled to take our own action”. The last time we took our own action, we got Iraq, and look how well that turned out for us. Since it’s doubtful that Assad was actually the one behind the attack, whose agenda does this pre-war rhetoric play into?

Rumors of war are percolating in Washington D.C., and if the Trump administration is not extremely careful it may find itself fighting several disastrous wars simultaneously.  Just one day after threatening North Korea with war, Donald Trump has committed to taking military action against the Assad regime in Syria.  Trump is blaming the chemical attack in Syria’s Idlib province on Tuesday on the Syrian government, and he is pledging that the United States will not just sit by and do nothing in response.  Unfortunately for all of us, military contingents from Russia, Iran and Hezbollah are mixed in among the Syrian forces, and so any strike on the Syrian military could potentially spark World War 3.

In this article, I am going to share with you several quotes from President Trump and members of his team over the past couple of days, and if you read them carefully you will see that Trump has clearly painted himself into a corner.

This first quote comes from CNN, and it is a portion of Trump’s response when he was asked about the chemical attack in Syria by a reporter…

“It crossed a lot of lines for me. When you kill innocent children, innocent babies … with a chemical gas that is so lethal that people were shocked to hear what gas it was, that crosses many, many lines — beyond a red line.”

Trump has very harshly criticized Barack Obama in the past for doing nothing in Syria once Obama’s “red line” was crossed, and so for Trump to use the exact same phrase is very meaningful.  And in his remarks about this new chemical attack, Trump once again pointed the finger at Obama for making “a blank threat”…

“I think the Obama administration had a great opportunity to solve this crisis a long time ago when he said the red line in the sand,” Trump said. “And when he didn’t cross that line after making the threat, I think that set us back a long ways not only in Syria, but in many other parts of the world, because it was a blank threat.”

But now that Trump has also accused Syria of crossing “a red line”, the only way that Trump can avoid the same kind of criticism that he was casting at Obama is to take military action.

White House spokesperson Sean Spicer underlined this point when he read a prepared statement to reporters during “an off-camera White House briefing”…

Today’s chemical attack in Syria against innocent people, including women and children, is reprehensible and cannot be ignored by the civilized world. These heinous actions by the Bashar al-Assad regime are a consequence of the past administration’s weakness and irresolution.

President Obama said in 2012 that he would establish a “red line” against the use of chemical weapons and then did nothing. The United States stands with our allies across the globe to condemn this intolerable act.

And UN Ambassador Nikki Haley made it crystal clear that the Trump administration was quite prepared to “take our own action” if the UN Security Council failed to address the chemical attack in Syria…

“When the UN consistently fails in its duty to act collectively, there are times in the life of states that we are compelled to take our own action,” she said.

Of course the UN Security Council is not going to condemn Syria, because Russia would veto any such resolution.

So the Trump administration is going to be faced with a choice.

Either they will back up their words and take military action in Syria (which would be totally disastrous), or they will be accused of making threats that turned out to be completely empty just like Obama did.

A much wiser approach would have been for the Trump administration to say that they were going to study this attack to determine who was behind it before pledging to take any action. 

Because the truth is that previous “chemical attacks” that were blamed on the Assad regime have turned out to be false flags that were designed to draw the western powers into the war…

The U.N. thoroughly investigated the first 2013 attack. The U.N. Commission of Inquiry’s Carla Del Ponte ultimately said the evidence indicated the attack was carried out by the Syrian rebels — not the Syrian government. ssibly

Despite this, support for the Syrian rebels from the U.S. and its allies only increased, raising serious questions about Obama’s sincerity when condemning chemical attacks.

Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh found the second major attack was committed in a similar manner. Hersh found that the U.S. quite deliberately attempted to frame the evidence to justify a strike on Assad without even considering al-Nusra, a terror group with access to nerve agents that should have been a prime suspect.

And I have a feeling that this new attack is another false flag, because it wouldn’t make any sense for the Assad regime to use chemical weapons at this point.  Thanks to the assistance of Russia, Iran and Hezbollah, the Assad regime is winning the civil war, and the only thing that could possibly turn the tide now would be military intervention by the United States.

So if Assad did actually use chemical weapons against a bunch of defenseless citizens on Tuesday, it would have been the stupidest strategic move that he potentially could have made.

In any controversy such as this, you always want to ask one key question: Who benefits?

Of course the answer to that question in this case is exceedingly clear.  The radical Islamic rebels that are being backed by Saudi Arabia and Turkey will greatly benefit if they are able to draw the western powers into the war on their side.

But what would the U.S. have to gain by getting involved in such a war?

ISIS is almost totally defeated in Syria thanks to Russia, and most of the country has already been reduced to rubble at this point.  But if we did get involved a lot of Americans could end up dead, and as I will discuss in Part II of this series, there is a very real possibility that we could end up in a military conflict with Russia, Iran and Hezbollah.

Back in 2013, a much wiser Donald Trump tweeted the following…

AGAIN, TO OUR VERY FOOLISH LEADER, DO NOT ATTACK SYRIA – IF YOU DO MANY VERY BAD THINGS WILL HAPPEN & FROM THAT FIGHT THE U.S. GETS NOTHING!

I could not have summed it up better myself.

Hopefully Donald Trump will take his own advice and will keep us out of a war that would be absolutely disastrous for our nation.

Ramey comments:

"Hopefully" --- hopefully???  My mother used to say, "Wish in one hand and spit in the other and see which one fills up the fastest". 

Are we being drawn into WW III as blindly as we were drawn into WW I and WW II?  And it's with false flags today just as it was then.  And it's all for the benefit of the bankers and those who call themselves "elite".  It will be so nice to see them exterminated as they will be soon. 

I know very well the world doesn't want to hear this but would prefer to believe that the world is going to go on as it has for all the time passed.  In order to think this, one has to have their head in the sand.  We are in times unprecedented and as the previous article illustrates, we have just entered uncharted waters that are clearly going to be our undoing.

Again, we don't want to believe this, much as the nation of Judah didn't want to believe Jeremiah when he told them Judah was about to cease being a nation and go into captivity.  But it happened and it's going to happen to America. 

So hang in there.  The economy, the politics and the geography is about to change in ways difficult to imagine unless you can begin to understand the words the prophets have left for us today.  
 

I CAN ASSURE YOU THAT AMERICANS, EVEN DEMOCRATS, WILL NOT LIKE WHAT THE LEADERS OF THE DNC HAVE DONE TO AMERICA. 

NOR WILL REPUBLICANS LIKE WHAT THEIR PARTY HAS DONE TO AMERICA.  HOWEVER, WHEN THOSE OF BOTH PARTIES DISCOVER WHAT HAS BEEN DONE TO AMERICA, AND ARE CLAMORING FOR BOTH PARTIES TO BE HUNG FROM LIGHT POLES IN DC, BOTH WILL BE IN THE DUNGEONS THEY HAVE PREPARED FOR THEMSELVES.   SAFELY IN THEIR DUNGEONS?  NOT EXACTLY.  THESE WILL GIVE A MEASURE OF PROTECTION AGAINST THE NUCLEAR EXCHANGE OF WW III BUT ARE NOT A LONG TERM PROTECTION.  THESE BECOME THEIR HOLDING CELLS UNTIL JUDGMENT.

We are coming down to the wire on the gov'ts of this age which all belong to Satan.

Yes, the gov't of America belongs to Satan, lock, stock and barrel. 

Americans don't want to hear that because they like to consider us a "christian nation" and so we are --- but, as I have shown you repeatedly in the pages of these Commentaries, christianity is idolatry.  Jesus is a mythological figure created by the vatican for the purpose of deception.  Go ahead --- prove me wrong --- I dare you.  Find out for yourself when christianity began and who was the founder.  Learn for yourself just what part churches play in the deception of "...the whole world".  You'll be amazed.

It becomes obvious in just the past few days that Donald Trump is a part of the Deep State and that he is moving as quickly as possible to implement WW III. 

The timing of WW III is not in the hands of men but rather in the hands of the Eternal.

He is the one who will ring down the curtain on Satan’s gov't and usher in the true new world order that levels the playing field on planet earth. 

For those with "...eyes to see and ears to hear", it should be obvious that we are in the times that just precedes those days. Not only is this world ready for the reset, this world cannot go on much longer with-out the reset.  Never forget the Pacific is dead.  The fraudulent money has reached critical mass and the Monsanto/chemtrails/ food and water poisonings are about to pay off big time in population reduction.  Is this "conspiracy theory"?  If you don't know, then you had better be obsessed with finding out. 

Events of the past week have pushed the prospect of WW iii to the forefront of our awareness.  The false flag of Assad using chemical weapons against the rebels seems to be on a par with the false flags used to start WW I and WW II.  Are we on the eve of WW III?  I have shared with readers that for many years I considered the very real possibility of America's demise being on the same day as that of Sodom and Jericho.  That day will be here this year in a mere ten more days.  Will it bring the end of America and Israel?