From the desk of
Bill Ramey
7 3 18
COMMENTARY
& OPINION
1 July 2018
Hello Folks,
The
national insane asylum once known as the United
States has become so unhinged lately that Hollywood leftist-liberal elitist Bill Maher is now calling for a crippling US economic collapse to destroy President Trump—with
Maher further proclaiming to his
millions of viewers that “we’re
not going to win the Supreme Court pick…I don’t know if we’re ever going to win
another election, because I keep saying, and I truly believe, Trump is going to go when he wants to go, and that
includes even if he loses the 2020 election”—and whose wish for
wholesale economic destruction to rain down upon his nation’s citizens is
actually more preferable to the radioactive fallout imagined for them by
left-wing Silicon
Valley multi-billionaire Tom Steyer who is now calling
for a nuclear war “to provide a real course correction to Trump”—but that prior to either of these
things happening, at least to me, it seems logical that someone would explain
to the American people the real
truth about what’s going on there before their now
underway civil war gets any worse.
So,
and with no one else bothering to tell the truth anymore, please allow me a few
minutes of your time today to tell you what’s really happening—and that I’ll
begin by my 100% agreeing with the Sisters, who, in their report “As Their Democratic Party “Train To Power” Goes Off The
Rails, Radical American Leftists Ignite Civil War”,
correctly stated last week that the most significant event to note about the
2016 US presidential election wasn’t
the election of Donald Trump, but the destruction of the Democratic Party.
American
radical leftists carry symbolic coffin of Democratic Party to its grave
In
one of the Washington Post’s rare,
and nearly completely accurate articles about this—“The Democratic Party Unraveling Is Not Good For America”—also
published this past week—they describe how the Democratic Party has disintegrated to such an extent, it can no
longer be called a national political party as it’s being taken apart, piece by
piece, by radically competing interests—best exampled by the
global “Merchant of Misery” George
Soros who has carved out a piece of the Democratic Party for himself so he can spend
millions-of-dollars to get elected Democratic
Party prosecutors throughout the United
States—none of whom will defend the American people as Soros
has found a new way to make money from
personal-injury lawsuits through his Soros Fund Management that is pushing into a branch of litigation finance
that few hedge funds have entered, with his family office now bankrolling a
company that’s insidiously creating investment portfolios out of lawsuits.
The
most important part of the Democratic
Party being broken off, though, is the American
Civil Liberties Union—known as the ACLU—that
was founded in 1920, and whose stated mission is “to defend and preserve the individual
rights and liberties guaranteed to every person in this country by the
Constitution and laws of the United States”.
This
past week, however, and for the first time in its 98 year history, the
ACLU announced that it would no
longer be fighting for free speech in America—and
whose shocking decision to do so was based on Georgetown
University Carmack Waterhouse Professor of Constitutional Law Louis Michael
Seidman having published
an article in the Columbia Law Review
titled “Can Free Speech Be Progressive?”—and
whose
answer to his own question was a resounding “NO!”
To
understand why the ACLU, along with
other radical leftists in the fast disintegrating Democratic Party, are abandoning the defense of free speech in America, I’ve got to bring you back to
1971, when Robert Bork, the most
prominent conservative law professor in the United States, who later became a Federal Judge and Supreme
Court nominee, wrote the definitive document on the United
States Constitution’s First Amendment titled “Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems”—that
was adopted as the standard to be used in all First Amendment cases in America,
and whose basic narrow outlines for when the First Amendment could be used stated: “Constitutional protection should be accorded only to speech
that is explicitly political…there is no basis for judicial intervention to
protect any other form of expression, be it scientific, literary or that
variety of expression we call obscene or pornographic”.
Knowing
that this interpretation of the First
Amendment spelled the certain death of all liberal-leftist causes the Democratic Party envisioned imposing
upon the American people by judicial
rulings, as they knew that their radical agenda would never pass muster in the
voting booths, Northwestern University
Pritzker School of Law Professor Martin Redish, also in 1971, fired
back against Judge Bork with his
article in the Georgetown Law Review
titled “The First Amendment in the Marketplace:
Commercial Speech and the Values of Free Expression”—and whose essence of was the proposing that First Amendment protection for “commercial
speech” be fought for in the courts by leftists.
By
1976, two cases pitting Judge Bork’s
and Professor Redish’s different
interpretations of the First Amendment
reached the United States Supreme Court—the
ACLU supported case of Buckley v. Valeo, and the case of Virginia State
Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council championed by
the leftist activist Ralph Nader—both of
which saw the nearly entirely liberal US
Supreme Court side with Professor
Redish’s expanded, and never known in history before, interpretation of the
First Amendment as protecting “commercial
speech”—with the only dissent
in these decisions coming from Justice William H.
Rehnquist, the court’s most conservative member, whose warnings of what
would happen if Judge Bork’s First
Amendment interpretations were ignored—and that, with the benefit of over
40 years worth of hindsight, the failings to heed the warnings given by Justice Rehnquist now has ACLU
Attorney Burt Neuborne declaring “I signed the brief in Buckley, I’m going to spend long
amounts of time in purgatory”—and Ralph Nader, likewise, now declaring
about his Virginia State Board of
Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council case: “It was one of the biggest boomerangs in judicial cases ever”.
Former United States Supreme Court
Chief Justice William Rehnquist shouts from his grave to the American leftists
of today: “I told you so!”
As
to why ACLU Attorney Neuborne fears
purgatory, and Ralph Nader is
tearfully watching in horror as this “big boomerang” smashes all
liberal-leftist hopes of their having any kind of future, you should know that
at the same time these two 1976 United
States Supreme Court rulings underpinned too numerous to mention
radical-leftist agendas to be forced down the throats and into the lives of the
American people, and that they’d
never vote for if allowed to do so (same
sex marriage, proliferation of pornography, unrestrained abortion of babies
right up to the ninth month of living in their mothers’ wombs, etc.)—but
that has now seen the nearly full decade of rule by a conservative majority
ruled Supreme Court having turned
this First Amendment “leftist logic” to their own advantage—to
include their 2009 Citizens
United decision declaring that corporations had a First Amendment right to give unlimited political campaign donations—and
this past week’s Janus ruling that US federal and State
government union workers had a First
Amendment right not to pay union dues—that America’s unions have funneled into Democratic Party coffers for decades, but will no longer be able to
do so.
Conservative United States Supreme
Court uses 1976 liberal interpretation of First Amendment to decimate American
leftist political power
Now
in this simple explanation I’ve given you of how the now fully conservative United States Supreme Court is slowly,
but very surely, bringing America
back to Judge Bork’s narrow interpretation
of what the First Amendment was
actually intended for (but that the New York Times comically calls the
“Weaponization
of the First Amendment”), you should understand why the
liberal-leftists have their heads exploding because of Justice Anthony Kennedy announcing his retirement—and to such an
extent that Hollywood radical Bill Maher is calling for the US to
collapse in economic chaos, radical
tech giant multi-billionaire Tom Steyer
is calling for nuclear war, radical filmmaker Michael
Moore is calling for 1 million people to
surround Washington D.C. to keep the US
Senate from confirming Justice
Kennedy’s replacement, and NBC
News reporter Taylor Cox openly calling for the genocide of all white Americans—with
these being just a few examples of the hundreds I could give you on how many of
these leftist-loonies have quit taking their much needed medication.
This
simple explanation I’ve given you, too, provides all the evidence you need to
prove that these leftists’ hatred of President
Trump would have been turned on any Republican
Party conservative candidate who beat Hillary
Clinton—after all, what did you think these radical leftists’ response
would be to having their United States
Supreme Court “toy” being taken away from
them? If you answer hysterical fits of
rage and incoherence, you’re coming close to understanding how dangerous and
unhinged they’re becoming!
To
what the future holds, it’s important for you to know too, I’m literally
begging each and every one of you to read Sister
Ciara’s special report “Roaring Youth Of America
Today Need Rapid Defense Against Liberal Lies And Deceit Before All Is Lost”—not
only because it shows the “cycle of time” we’re now all living
through, but calls YOU TO ACTION to protect the future that awaits
if enough people stand up and support those of us, literally, standing as the
last line of defense.
And for
those of you still looking down at the ground to keep from seeing the deadly
storm gathering on the horizon heading right for you:
Here’s
a warning —in 1913, just a few years
before the Russian Revolution, the Bolsheviks were a tiny group of
radicals like you see in America
today, four
years later they had taken over the entire country—in 1928, the
Nazi party was an obscure joke,
winning a mere 2.6% of the votes in the German
national election that year, not even five years later, though, Adolf Hitler was German chancellor and had been awarded supreme power by the Enabling Act of 1933—and right now,
today, in South Africa—you know, that country that the
“Merchant
of Misery” George Soros has
been destabilizing as he
prepares for his massive land grab there—its over 4.4 million
white citizens have just been warned by their radical leftist leader: “We have not called for the killing of white people…at least
for now. I can’t guarantee the future”—with, no
doubt, this
white genocide being cheered by NBC News
reporter Taylor Cox who just can’t wait
for it to happen in America too.
So
finally folks, and before it’s too late, can you please help us out, right now,
by going below and giving us what you can so we on the front lines of this war
can keep defending you?
Thank
you for listening and aiding us in our hour of desperate need, and, as always
too, please feel free to write me at
with any comments/questions/suggestions, and remembering to put ATTN: BRIAN in the subject line.
All the best folks,
Brian
Webmaster
Paris
Fr.
No comments:
Post a Comment